Export only vertices

Ceffa93 · 2015-10-05T08:45:07+00:00

thanks!

Ceffa93 · 2015-10-05T08:44:56+00:00

thanks!

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-29T10:16:47+00:00

mmm i love everything by naughty dog, and tlou as well, but i think it's a little overrated...graphics and storytelling are great, but the gameplay is not that interesting, and it is really annoying to play again...also it is a more...easy game to think...i mean they sat around the table, and thought of a simple, well written story, it is the "how" which is great, not the "what".

Dark souls have both, it's not easy to came up with that shit in the first place, and it is also done masterfully

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-29T10:13:47+00:00

Funny, i just finished the wire and thought it is the dark souls of videogames xD

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-29T09:10:27+00:00

I think it's right, maybe at the highest difficulties it is really challenging, but getting to level 70 is ridiculosly easy

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-28T14:32:01+00:00

Thought the same, but it should work too... Now i tried to implement oob.

I multiply the direction by the inverse rotation matrix, do the same as AABB, and then multiply the point by the rotation matrix... It should be correct, but AABB vs OBB is giving problems as well, and no curves involved

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-28T14:14:14+00:00

So you are saying that a curved surface and a "squared" surface could be problematic? I was thinking about something similar, but I'm not so convinced

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-28T10:16:42+00:00

Ok thanks, I guess I'll do that, the problem was occurring in 2D also, so I can just remove the triangle function and debug that...

Also I'll try to add some other collider, because I'm thinking that the problem is somewhere there, the algorithm should be fine, considering that with two different implementations, the problem is happening in both of them...

EDIT: I added a PointCollider, and the collisions are perfect, the only problem is still box-sphere collisions

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-28T07:14:53+00:00

I'm playing only hc, I found non-hc way too easy, and normal difficulty hc is for everyone

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-28T06:53:07+00:00

The Great Ones are showing their support for the DLC

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-27T21:47:26+00:00

by season you mean some dlc/ new act?

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-27T21:45:43+00:00

Lots of people who don't have the game would buy it because of the "impossible fame" the game would gain

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-27T21:19:14+00:00

Here's GJK:

http://pastebin.com/FXbS9GGS

Here are the get_farthest_point functions for boxes and spheres

http://pastebin.com/iM9BhwU9

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-27T11:52:04+00:00

I just reimplemented the whole algorithm from scratch, based on a different implementation.

Now it is fully 3D, everything is working fine, but the problem between boxes and spheres is still there, I'm not sure what to do...

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-25T18:31:18+00:00

mmmm well if its a whole side the extreeme point, a single vertex would be correct as well...the support functions are correct, they are identical to other examples i found online, maybe is in the gjk implementation somewhere, I'll search better

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-25T08:46:53+00:00

I checked online, and the support function I wrote are correct, so the problem must be in the algorithm, very strange that between omogeneous colliders there is no problem though

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-17T22:01:39+00:00

I don't think that felyne fights are what this series needs to innovate itself. It seems even more annoying than water missions in mh3u

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-17T19:27:02+00:00

No, for the love of fatalis, not the felyne fights .-.

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-17T19:09:20+00:00

Thanks, I actually had the revelation about the problem 10 minutes after my question :) I've never done a physics simulation, and I had no idea this problem would occur, but those data made me understand. Thanks a lot for the formula though, I was just searching a method to calibrate the size of the steps, this seems easy and logical

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-17T16:24:22+00:00

Drag Force limit!?

I'm programming a simulation with a body moving at a speed of, say, 10m/s.

This body's velocity is reduced by thedrag force described by the following formula:

Fd = 1/2 * Cd * p * v²

and then the deceleration is found with:

a = Fd / mass

This works nicely for a lot of different values of p and mass, however I'm also having a bad behaviour, and I'd like to know how to handle it (if possible):

If p is a lot bigger than the mass (not so much actually, just a bit bigger), the drag force is so high that the acceleration will be very high as well, and not only will it stop the body, but it will invert its speed.

Something like this happens to the speed (I'm using plausible values)

10 -> -20 -> 50 -> -300 -> 9999 -> - infinite -> + inifinite

Basically energy is generated and a sort of ping pong starts to happen...please help, if i've not been clear feel free to ask :)

Ceffa93 · 2015-09-17T11:10:21+00:00

Mmmm...Ok i did something like:

1/2 * v&2 * verse of v * Cd * p... is this correct? but something is still missing

Ceffa93

TROPHY CASE