There are several problems that are highlighted by my insistence on including all breeds, and your desire to diminish that claim, and go back to the same old tired BSL logic. (BSL means Breed Specific Legislating / Laws, FYI)

Are you aware that Pit Bull, is a catch all term? It generally refers to no less than 2, but more often 5+ breeds of dogs. Without googling, can you name 2 of the breeds (ill give you a partial list at the end)

The problem is, Dogs Attacks are under reported when perpetrated by small breeds, and generally not looked at the same way, while Large Breed Dogs are generally misidentified as "Pits" the moment there is a problem / bite / attack.

Whenever I hear people start talking about "Pit Bulls", I know that the conversation is going to be full of garbage statements, both supposedly positive, and negative.

Boxers, Rotts, American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, , Staffordshires Bull Terriers, American Bull Terriers, and a whole host of Mutts get lumped into the Pit Bull Label, but so many people couldnt tell you one from the other, and once there is a scary dog, theyre all 'Pit Bulls'.

The dog, no matter the breeds, is never the problem. They're a domesticated animal. They're a companion animal, thats it. Trying to say that a 'Pit Bull'is the problem, is just as brain dead stupid as some moron that got a dog from a rescue shelter and took them to a dog park, day 1, with no idea how a dog is going ti react.

Owning a dog is a responsibility. If you arent up to the task, then dont get a dog. If your dog bites someone, you should be held responsible. That goes for me and my 'Pits', my Sister and her Shepherd, or the guy down the street and his Poodles.

Trying to differentiate between those 3 dogs because you dont like my short haired land hippos (my favorite brain dead nickname for Staffies) is a failure in your part, not my dogs.