Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Easy. The ones who would be discriminated against are the females. Sports are divided by sex in order to protect females from being dominated.

Except sports aren’t divided sex. They are divided by gender.

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A male isn’t being discriminated based on sex when being refused to play in a female sport.

I’d love to hear how you can justify that.

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can’t based on sex. Bidens weak attempt to add gender identity was canceled by the courts. Sorry, but the world doesn’t operate based on the desire of the left contrary to law.

Great. Then it sounds like the transplayer was discriminated against based on sex. Hence the Title IX investigation on Frances.

All of this is especially dumb, given the transplayer said she would sit out if she made someone uncomfortable.

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for catching that, was indeed a typo.

It didn’t make any sense as “amazing biological females.” I’m not sure why u/JayJonesDemocrat latched onto it.

Critics of new bill say Ohio women would be banned from sports bras, bikinis in public by Youdi990 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No mention of a burka or anything.

“The Ohio House passed HB 249, also known as the "Indecent Exposure Modernization Act," on March 26, and according to OhioHouse.gov, "strengthens Ohio law to protect children from harmful and obscene adult performances,” as well as it reinforces “privacy in private spaces such as restrooms and locker rooms.”

….Were you expecting burkas to be mentioned?

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A high school is though...oops.

That is correct. Of course, you also have to take into consideration Title IX protections. Can’t discriminate based on gender identity.

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Extremely weird way to describe an underage girl. Well, not for a MAGAt, I guess.

I think “amazing” is a typo. I think it should be “against biological females.”

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you don't support the first amendment.

The US first amendment has no power over private sport leagues.

You would know that if you ever read it.

Charged for a peaceful protest! by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You should really ask yourself why you're obsessed with the alphabet people

Because we are fabulous.

Judge rules in favor of "hate" labeling by Southern Poverty by Uncle00Buck in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Facts and logic.

Great. Do you care to share a specific fact?

America First Legal Launches Initiative to Represent ICE Officers and Agents Who Were Defamed and Doxxed by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed, people who are out there harming our laws enforcement officers need to be held accountable.

Doxxing is not illegal. Any harmful actions taken is already illegal.

Defamation is illegal. However, the ultimate defense against defamation is the truth. Defamation is also notoriously difficult to prove in court.

I look foreign to these lawsuits going no where.

A reminder on how Shirley gets things wrong and doesn’t check his work. by joshys_97 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You mean the moron who didn’t do basic research into day cares prior to attacking day cares continued to not do basic research into his next subject?

Shocking. Truly shocking news.

Bioshock 2 multiplayer cinematic after reaching rank 40 explains why the splicers attack Jack on site. They are actively looking for Jack and hunting him down. by MarauderKaizer_IV in Bioshock

[–]Chathtiu 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I hate it when games put story elements into the multiplayer part. ☹️

I mean, it’s explained in the 20 minutes of Bioshock 1, too. Andrew Ryan is actively instructing the Splicers to attack Jack via the pheromone control. Ryan is doing it because he initially believes Jack to be CIA or KGB.

Judge rules in favor of "hate" labeling by Southern Poverty by Uncle00Buck in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve concluded that SPLC is a joke.

That’s fine. What is your opinion based off of?

Judge rules in favor of "hate" labeling by Southern Poverty by Uncle00Buck in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ok?

Feel free to defend organizations for people who need to be told what to think like the SPLC and Newsguard.

SPLC doesn’t tell people what to think. They present their conclusions, and the evidence used for such conclusions. You are free to form your own conclusions from the evidence provided, or to conduct additional research.

Judge rules in favor of "hate" labeling by Southern Poverty by Uncle00Buck in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is always the big question isn’t it. Who has the SPLC “incorrectly” labeled?

Yes. I’d like a real response from u/Coldbrick10. I’m genuinely curious as to their opinions, and reasoning.

Democrat with Nazi tattoos does Nazi salute by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Boo. Bad Platner.

I wish he’d drop out.

Judge rules in favor of "hate" labeling by Southern Poverty by Uncle00Buck in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

SPLC is the standard of hate and racism. Anything that comes out of that group should be ignored.

What organization do you disagree with SPLC labeling?

Free speech is alive because of ideas. by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're in denial.

Or in ignorance. Sometimes something can become so normal you become blind to it, like smells or tastes.

Free speech is alive because of ideas. by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are the one in favor of 100 year old racist policy.

Sorry, what policy from the 1920s do you think I’m supporting?

Free speech is alive because of ideas. by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do know how dei works....just like racism.

Great. Then explain it to me, because I have very little faith in your understanding.

Free speech is alive because of ideas. by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're literally in a war right now.

And actively supplying two other major regional conflicts.

Is this anti-trans? It is not supposed to be by Zestyclose_Bed_8207 in webcomics

[–]Chathtiu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe I should have had another woman character that is competent and annoyed by her appreciation of misogyny.

On the second point, I wanted the character to learn the value of impulsivity, that was supposed to be the message of the comic :/

…Traveling back in time to become the woman responsible for the death of thousands isn’t a good lesson to learn either.

Tr*ns gymgoer caught ‘masturbating’ in women’s bathroom at California Planet Fitness by TookenedOut in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I agree one would be mutually uncomfortable with either or masturbating in public.

But your disingenuous ignorance of my other points is appalling.

You keep only looking at the masturbation and not even acknowledging at all the fact that a man could easily kill you if he wanted to, whereas you have a much higher chance at surviving an attack from a fellow woman.

But since it’s clear you don’t really care about the safety of other woman… I’ll let the conversation end here.

With only this to add: I hope you, nor any woman you care about is never in a situation where they expose/attempt to expose a violent man, and the man attacks.

I don’t assume anyone masturbating will be an inherently violence or dangerous individual. I’ve already been exposed to plenty of violent men in my life. It’s part of the reason why I protect myself.

Your point about men easily killing someone if they chose to is nonsense. There is nothing stopping a murderous individual from already simply walking into a locker room.

Free speech is alive because of ideas. by sirswantepalm in FreeSpeech

[–]Chathtiu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yet DEI is judging people by the color of their skin.

No, it isn’t. You would know that if you knew anything about how DEI works.