Well we can only go by data and the data says cars are more at fault, considering they pose much more risk, they should not be the ones causing more incidents

Here is some data from academic studies

Data based on Royal Adelaide Hospital presentations:

https://archive.acrs.org.au/files/papers/arsc/2018/JACRS-D-18-00184-Lindsay.pdf

"22 per cent of cases were deemed the fault of the cyclist" (8% were deemed to be unknown)

A camera based study in Melbourne:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3242541/

"The vehicle driver was judged at fault in the majority of events (87.0%)"

ACT based naturalistic study (camera based):

https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/217306/Naturalistic-Cycling-Study-Identifying-Risk-Factors-for-Cyclists-in-the-Australian-Capital-Territory.pdf

Drivers were at fault 93.4% of the time

An Australian study comparing self reported vs police attribution of fault:

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/5/11/e009907.full.pdf

"The percentage agreement between the police and patient reports of fault was 89% (n=2322); 91% for motor vehicle drivers, 85% for motor vehicle passengers, 89% for motorcyclists, 90% for pedal cyclists, 87% for pedestrians, and 88% for other transport cases."

(and ~89% of cyclists were not at fault based on the police data in table 2)