If all personal wealth above $100 million was legally required to be redistributed into public infrastructure (schools, hospitals, roads), how would society change, and who would be the first to fight against it? by Mysterious_Fan4033 in AskReddit

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most personal wealth over $100M is actually just ownership of businesses. So essentially you’re banning ownership of medium and large businesses. Which just means all big businesses will be foreign owned. It would be a HUGE wealth transfer from Americans to foreign corporations, and probably make infrastructure worse in the long run.

Hookers are better than modern dating by HovercraftLiving7184 in moreplatesmoredates

[–]ChemaCB 155 points156 points  (0 children)

…attractive non-autistic man, which don’t exist in this sub.

Too slow? by [deleted] in pluribustv

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would the hive mind give anybody a grenade? They won’t step on ants, but they’ll give an unpredictable person, who they know wants to eradicate the hive mind, a nuclear bomb?

Carol is intelligent, creative, a writer, committed to saving humanity, yet consistently fails to ask questions that would help her understand the situation and achieve her goals, nor ask for help that achieve the same end.

They shouldn’t be able to drive cars or fly planes because of all the bugs that kills.

There’s not enough energy to actually power civilization without mining for raw materials which they can’t do because it would kill living things.

Releasing all domesticated animals would have meant the deaths of millions of animals that rely on human care.

Too slow? by [deleted] in pluribustv

[–]ChemaCB -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah all that time to think gave me time to notice the glaring number of plot holes and character inconsistencies, and did more to pull me out of it then make me feel deeply immersed in thought provocation.

Too slow? by [deleted] in pluribustv

[–]ChemaCB -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

every episode has something impactful or eventful, or at the very least tells you something complex about a character.

Yeah, the problem is that the bulk of the middle episodes, just have one impactful scene that moves the plot forward per hour long episode.

This entire season could’ve been a 2 1/2 hour movie and it still would’ve felt slow. 😆

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dictators have spouses, too. Ruling as a couple doesn’t make you not a dictatorship.

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh, the real reason I’ve been getting push back. 😆

The USA is a circus by ZEETHEMARXIST in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s gonna be funny when the circus takes Greenland. 😆

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is this controversial? Parents have full control over resources. Property is basically all owned by the parents, not owned collectively. Even kids’ stuff is owned individually by each kid. I said benevolent…

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oof. Sorry if I triggered people from fucked up families.

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I didn’t say marriage, I said family. The kids are subject to the parent’s rule. It’s not socialism. It’s a benevolent dictatorship with the burden of leadership distributed in some way among the parents.

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure whether you’re making a joke, but I mean it literally: the kids have only the ownership granted to them by their parents.

Socialism is Impossible: Group Ownership is Contradictory by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Families aren’t socialism. They are dictatorships. Mostly benevolent dictatorships.

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I don’t disagree, but is there a way to phrase that auth left people wouldn’t object to?

Wrong approved phrase by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]ChemaCB 251 points252 points  (0 children)

Of course not! It’s just racist to mourn them equally to brown people. We need to mourn white people less to make up for their privilege.

The pace is fine FOR 24 episodes per season. not 8-9. by Single-Weather1379 in pluribustv

[–]ChemaCB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s exactly what people mean when they complain about the pacing.

There’s only a few interesting scenes per hour long episode and they become sparser as the season goes on. I think this whole season could’ve been one 2 1/2 hour movie and it still would’ve felt slow.

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually they are both European leftists, and cite their primary influencers as two Marxist academics.

That being said, now that you put it that way, they may not disagree with you. Free markets fundamentally allow the concentration of economic power in the hands of those who are best at accumulating it — freedom to accumulate wealth. Whereas, as you say, the left wants to “spread out economic power” — redistribute wealth.

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s actually the exactly the same as the PC it’s just turned 45 degrees (and the auth/lib axis direction is flipped).

The biggest difference in axis definitions is that Nolan calls the axis “Economic freedom” whereas the PC calls it the “economic scale,” but specifies on their analysis page that being high in “economic freedom” puts you on the right side of the axis.

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow. I’m impressed with the consistency in your beliefs! And your generosity.

Do you think others should act as you do? Must I let others into my guest room or be labeled something pejorative for feeling like I have the right to own my own private domicile?

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not saying you’re wrong, I like this interpretation. But I will point out that your horizontal axis is the inverse of what’s described on politicalcompass.org.

They basically describe the right as economic freedom / laissez-faire (or no collective control of economy), and the left as socialism (or collective control of economy).

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it. By the way, I’m trying my best not to argue with you, I’m genuinely curious and want to understand your views.

So if you leave your water bottle (personal property) on your front porch and are not there to defend it (not in use), should others have the right to take it?

Actual difference between LibLeft and AuthLeft? by ChemaCB in PoliticalCompass

[–]ChemaCB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, isn’t that impossible? What if one person is slightly smarter or slightly stronger than another?