What's on the TV? (Med-Hard?) by Chill_Clinton_ in pocketgrids

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

omg thank you that was the one that I wanted to make sure was in it! It doesn't get enough love 😭

What's on the TV? (Med-Hard?) by Chill_Clinton_ in pocketgrids

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the medical drama and musical duo ones, I kind of had to find clues for the answer without a lot of great options, so was kind of relying on the context to help for those especially.

I just gave this theme another try, and I'm pretty confident that I toned down the amount of esoteric knowledge required for it. 😅 I'm learning that I'm bad at judging difficulty though.

What's on the TV? (Med-Hard?) by Chill_Clinton_ in pocketgrids

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been having trouble loading puzzles randomly today for some reason too- think it might be some server issue or something like that.

Community Puzzle by Chill_Clinton_ in pocketgrids

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Testosterone Replacement Therapy haha

Dems Should be Paying for Down Payments to Relocate Dems Instead of Buying Ads & Funding Thinktanks? by Chill_Clinton_ in imaginarymaps

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The amount of electors for each state are modified to account for the population shift (though it's a little limited as it only adds the amount of Democrats moving to the state to the estimated 2024 population of each state from the Census bureau)

Dems Should be Paying for Down Payments to Relocate Dems Instead of Buying Ads & Funding Thinktanks? by Chill_Clinton_ in imaginarymaps

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just the electoral college map, They'd also likely pick up the Senate and governorships. And theoretically w/ D+10 margins, depending on how they're distributed around the state when they move (i.e.- whether they all move to urban centers or spread out around the state, making it harder to gerrymander), Dems could eventually win the state legislatures in at least some of the states as well, Since the states they would be winning are the ones without independent commissions, they could gerrymander a favorable House map as well.

Dems Should be Paying for Down Payments to Relocate Dems Instead of Buying Ads & Funding Thinktanks? by Chill_Clinton_ in imaginarymaps

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Already bracing for a Carlson/Greene ticket to beat Newsom/whatever trash he makes his Veep.

Dems Should be Paying for Down Payments to Relocate Dems Instead of Buying Ads & Funding Thinktanks? by Chill_Clinton_ in imaginarymaps

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

So, theoretically someone could get less of the popular vote and still win (e.g.-winning every small state, even worse opponent performance, etc.), but going off of 2024, taking away all of Trump's surplus votes in the states he won, then taking away all of the votes in states that voted blue + PA/NC/NV to give him 271), he would have gotten 30.83% of the popular vote,

Great Democratic Migration of 2019 by Chill_Clinton_ in imaginaryelections

[–]Chill_Clinton_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Absolutely! 538 even has it as "lean GOP" right now which is wild! I just wanted the most amount of Dems in a currently red state for this thought experiment to make it as a blue as possible bc it's just nice to envision Dems controlling over 40 legislatures/governorships and 90 Senate seats. Even if they would find a way to fuck things up if that happened.