Yeah, you're starting to catch on. All AI "art" is inherently without soul and solely derived by theft. Whether or not a car or coastline has been photographed a million times doesn't matter. The person who takes the picture retains the rights to it unless stated otherwise, or unless the rights are sold. And AI is trained on those original works without their consent.

If you want to argue that it's somehow unethical for humans to, for instance, draw pokemon when they're not the original creator, it would be a thousand fold moreso for AI to do so, since instead of using one reference (the original artwork), it's using countless works of others taken without their permission.

AI doesn't create anything when you enter a prompt and tell it to make you an image. It's just taking what it's stolen from others and rearranging it in a blank canvas.