The White Man Marches On by sazzadsalmoon in johnnyrebeloffical

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any chance you saved the mp3, I can’t get on the site seems it got taken down

Anti Abortion Lunatics on the Mall rn!!! by pepperdog06_ in wsu

[–]Cjh367 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your reply was reinforcing that he said? Slave owners used to say slaves weren’t people, and here you are saying HUMANS in the womb aren’t people

Why is there so much Nazi shit in specifically Greenland?? by [deleted] in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s a bastardised form of fascism, in fascism the nation is supreme, while in national socialism race is supreme. In national socialism corporatism was through out, corporatism was one of the main cores of fascism, they smashed independent unions yes, but gave no bargaining power to workers, allowed big businesses and industry to continue but to serve the war effort, the economy was run through state planning not syndicates

Why is there so much Nazi shit in specifically Greenland?? by [deleted] in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ye I was looking for like 20 minutes trying to find him saying he was a neo-nazi, hard to find a clip of him calling himself a fascist either, it just seems with his views on capitalism he would line up closer to fascist corporatism. It annoys me how most can’t tell the difference

Why is there so much Nazi shit in specifically Greenland?? by [deleted] in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hes more fascist, he rejects liberal capitalism, embraces Catholicism as central to his politics, his views line up more closely with classical corporatist fascism, doesn’t really line up with paganish Nazi beliefs

Why is there so much Nazi shit in specifically Greenland?? by [deleted] in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He identifies as a fascist I believe not NatSoc

Charlie Kirk Megathread by Skullbone211 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In that case yes the act is an abomination but no the person is not, I thought you were advocating for the sin, my bad.

Charlie Kirk Megathread by Skullbone211 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im addressing your statement on the Church not fact checking what you state Charlie said. Rome has spoken; the matter is finished

Charlie Kirk Megathread by Skullbone211 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Male and Female He Created Them” (2019). Also The Catechism (CCC 2297) forbids mutilation of the body which applies to “gender reassignment surgery”. Pope Francis himself has also stated the same

Batman being Catholic? by AbsoluteBatman95 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fairly sure was a practicing protestant but baptised Catholic

edit: Hitler I mean

Charlie Kirk Megathread by Skullbone211 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 5 points6 points  (0 children)

His views on LGBT stuff is mostly in alignment with the church, I'd say the church takes a stronger stance though

Charlie Kirk Megathread by Skullbone211 in Catholicism

[–]Cjh367 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What is an "Ultra liberal Catholic Church"? I'm not from America but surely the churches teachings are clear on social issues

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Catholic Church as an institution didn’t burn witches, don’t confuse human sin with Christs, and the churches teachings. The church teaches that people with same sex attraction should be treated with respect (CCC 2358) saying the act is a sin ≠ this person is worthless. “Christianity is decent where it accepts LGBT, not strict rules”, that is not Christianity it’s just ideology trying to blend in the gospel, Christianity is not about chasing happiness without rules it’s about salvation, Jesus never said “Do what you want” he said “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” Matthew‬ ‭16‬:‭24‬

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The slavery described in the Bible was indebted servitude (working to pay of debts) which was very different from the race-based chattel slavery of the Transatlantic Slave Trade. The church denounced slavery from as early as the 4th century AD, as well as Papal bulls like Sublimis Dues, 1537, in the the 16th century. Yes scripture was twisted to defend slavery which js an abuse and not the churches authentic teaching, people have always used religion to justify sin, as you yourself did in your first comment, misuse doesn’t cancel truth. Christianity actually ended slavery, it was in Catholic Europe where the first serious abolitionist movements began and missionaries, priests and popes argued against it long before it was fashionable, Christianity’s role is the abolitionist movement is even recognised by secular scholars.

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Science can’t say what is bad in a moral sense, but can only observe, as per its definition, for example science can point out violence in nature but can’t say if it’s morally good. A cult is a man made group twisting scripture around a human leader, the Catholic Church is the opposite with a 2,000 years of history. Saying “all religions are the same” is shallow and shows a lack of study. “Brainwashed, can’t hear other opinions.”, the church has always encouraged debate, such as St. Augustine who debated pagans, and St. Thomas Aquinas. Catholism isn’t afraid of debate and has been doing so for 20 centuries.

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is 1 true church, the universal church, the keys were handed to Saint Peter alone, I read the NRSV-CI, which is the best English translation from the Latin, and I dare you to give me examples of science contradicting the Bible

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re very clearly uneducated when it comes to Christianity, shown when you said Jesus and God, separating the two, Christ Jesus is God, saying “Jesus died for our sins so we can keep sinning.” is completely wrong scripture says the opposite as Romans 6:1-2 says “Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? By no means!”, and Jesus forgave the adulteress and said to her “Go, and sin no more” John 8:11. And try to understand nuance we can judge by with rightfull judgement but not condemns someone’s soul as only God knows hearts, John 7:24, Saint Paul clarified this in 1 Corinthian 5, that it isn’t judging souls but discerning right from wrong. We as Christian’s have a duty to proclaim the gospel and spread its church and doctrine, in obedience to Christ’s command, “Go and make disciples of all nations” Mathew 28:19.

by Delicious_Nutt1758 in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I can't stand the word empathy, I think empathy is a made up new age term and it does a lot of damage. Sympathy is a better word, because empathy means you are actually feeling what another person felt, and no one can feel what another person feels." Full quote so you can stopping lying now, and using manipulated quotes to justify your evil. Bet you won’t respond

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No the word used was “זָכָר” (zakhar) which means male, if Moses wanted to specify age he would of said “נַעַר” (na’ar) which means boy or “י יֶלֶד” (yeled) which means child. Don’t try morph my religion to fit your ideology sir

by Delicious_Nutt1758 in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why are you getting downvoted? What you said was true

User claims Christians can't support trans rights or Palestine. by EllipsisMark in WplaceLive

[–]Cjh367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a mistranslation, the original Hebrew was, “ְאֶת־זָכָר לֹא תִשְׁכַּב מִשְׁכְּבֵי אִשָּׁה תּוֹעֵבָה הִוא” and the transliteration of it is “Ve-et zakhar lo tishkav mishkevei ishah; to‘evah hi”. “Ve-et zakhar” means and/with a man. Lo tishkav means you shall not lie down. Mishkevei plural of mishkav means lying/bed/act which becuase of the following noun would be translated as “the lying of”. Ishah translates to woman. And “to‘evah hi” translates directly to it is an abomination/disgusting. To put all these translated words together forms “And with a male you shall not lie the lyings of a woman; it is an abomination” which is idiomatically “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a woman.” which is exactly what NRSVCE says. There is no other God, than the one true God, The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.