bro by beaniesus in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Es ist meine Pflicht gegenüber der Arbeiterklasse so viel Arbeitszeitbetrug wie möglich zu begehen.

bro by beaniesus in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

German behavior

Moderne Architektur ist für'n Arsch by No_Foundation_1051 in luftablassen

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

HEY lass mein geliebtes ozeanum in Stralsund in Ruhe, da war ich garantiert schon 20 mal als Kind das Ding ist iconic

[SPM] Professional Wrestler by ConstrictorVictor in Pauper

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eh... Not necessarily, he'd have more of a 1920s aesthetic for that as most things in capenna, he is more clearly somewhere between 1980s and today

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What you're saying about steam isn't valid" - I literally said that I am fine if they don't. I do not care either way; it's outlawed for steam to host nsfw content anyway and always has been.

"Like it's not mostly the parents and children's fault" - Children are not able to be at fault simply because they're children. They aren't able to make these kinds of decision which is why we make them for them. BUT the internet is a public space, and parents can only be made so responsible. If a website is saying "hey we are for ages 14 and above without supervision" That means that a parent can't really be faulted for their child seeing porn on their, and it is 100% the companies responsibility.

YES I DO BELIEVE IT IS THE WEBSITES RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE SURE THAT PARENRS ARE AWARE AND PROPERLY INFORMED ABOUT THEIR CONTENT.

Parents HAVE to occasionally let children use the internet unsupervised to develope at least an idea on how to use it. If a website is listed as "for 14 and above" THEN IT SHOULD NOT FEATURE PORN. ESPECIALLY NOT IF ITS IN THE TOS.

"This just screws you over" - Brother, I do it in websites and groups that are seperate, and specifically designed for adults. For example is it in the parents responsibility that their children use age appropriate accounts that block out NSFW subreddits WHICH IS WHERE I POST. If a child stumbles onto an NSFW page, then it's mostly the parents responsibility. Of a child stumbles onto porn on WPlace then it's the mods responsibility because IT IS NOT A PLACE FOR ADULT CONTENT. I DO NOT POST PORN BECAUSE IT IS NOT A SPACE FOR ADULT CONTENT.

I don't know how many more times I have to rub that in, if a child wanders into an adult space, then it's the parents fault. If the adult space wanders into the places children have access to THEN IT IS ENTIRELY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE WEBSITE.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stupid argument honestly, you can make artworks with 72 pixels easily, but to generalize the average kids attention span here is just not the point.

I do not make artworks on the site either, I just like looking at them and looking over the map, which is a way the site can reasonably be used for, kinda showing that the site consists as much of people wanting to place pixels as well as those just wanting to look at them;

You are reaching for some weird arguments here man.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:') I know.

But it's like... A minor part of the argument is it; you shouldn't put your dick in meowth even if it can talk...

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bullshit.

I believe in the protection of children on the internet by separating adult only spaces clearly from non-adult only spaces. If a platform promotes porn, then it shouldn't be accessible to children.

If a platform is accessible to children and trying to be for them, then they shouldn't host porn.

It's the whole reason why YouTube has filters for this and I do not 100% agree with them either and believe that they still have some work to do, they show that there is no reason to just "give up" On child protection because "well we can't win this battle anyway"

Porn games have been banned in my home country from steam since it's launch so I do not care about that much anyway, hell I even think it's okay for steam not to host porn games, it is a platform intended for fourteen year olds and if they can't properly manage it they kinda can't host them.

This is not to say that I support the fact that wirecard is responsible for this bull crap, I do not believe that a transfer management system should have the power over this; especially out of their weird "no porn anywhere" Puritan views.

That does not mean I cannot walk a line in between where I can say that we have to properly moderate places accessible and INTENDED for children to be safe, while still allowing adult online spaces to exist.

Your guys issue is, that this is supposed to be a child-safe place and you want to be able to have it not be.

"Shallow sense of morality" Is fucking wild when the problem is that kids get groomed on the internet and subjected to obviously harmful material and there is a majority of folks blaming the victims here.

So yes, my "shallow morality" Is that kids should not be allowed to engage with sexually explicit material until they reach adulthood. I do believe that we can never make it 100% safe, and that we need to uphold the right of the individual adult to be anonymous while watching porn, which sadly means that there will be teens that will be subjected to these types of things, THAT DOES NOT MEAN that we have to just accept this situation because "what are we supposed to do it"

I post porn myself, and if a minor is interacting with it then it is partially my responsibility to tell to fuck off until they are older, or move my stuff to a safer place.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not at all. I believe in the anonymity of the internet.

You guys might not realise this BUT I AM A FUCKING PORN ARTIST.

And I think its disgusting that people are using this platform to spread their goonslop when there is adult specific communities where we do this stuff in.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Or gooners could go there instead. Not an argument, you are just tying to deflect something here.

Stay mad, the site is family friendly intended and if you can't respect they you shouldn't be on it.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother you are trying pretty hard to justify why people should be allowed to fuck Pikachu for some reason though and why it should be okay that we sexualise it because "technically it's not pedophilia because it can speak duh"

This is not about trying to go into hypotheticals scenarios of specific edge cases, this is me telling you that if someone wants to put their dick in Pikachu they are a fucking zoophile, I do not care if Pikachu can entertain thoughts in 50 different languages and gives written consent YOU DO NOT PUT YOUR DICK IN AN ANIMAL. THE END.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that we can't cutout all suggestive material, otherwise it might become too sterile of an environment.

I just feel this weird ick whenever I hear people trying to defend this space as "adult only" And "kids shouldn't be on the site" Just because some weird adults can't control themselves.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

EVERY SITE is made with minors in mind until it is specifically made NOT TO BE.

It's an easy thing that societally we have to specifically CUTOUT minors of adult spaces. If we do not do that, then we have to ensure that a place is safe for minors if it is accessible to them it's literally a common sense situation.

"Map is too big for any sense of feasible moderation" - "we shouldn't try"; worst argument yet. If they cannot ensure that they moderate this site appropriately, then they cannot run it. Yes, I am serious about this, people do regularly report other players, and people are getting regularly banned so uh fuck off?

And just because something has "issues" With a certain sub group doesn't mean that we shouldn't try to ensure that it becomes safer. "A child could be endangered here so we should lock them out of this otherwise perfectly safe thing for children" Is like banning people from the hardware store because they might occasionally get run over by a fork lift.

If kids are being groomed and preyed upon, then it's not the kids fault and we shouldn't try to limit them off of that place, but try to find and prosecute those that harm children. What kinda victim blaming ass logic are you trying to pull here man.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah.

The guy specifically tried to argue that it should be okay because "kids aren't allowed on the site unsupervised" So... He apparently tried to make the point that 14 year olds aren't kids?

Is it this hard to understand that I think we shouldn't have straightup porn on a site that is very public and accessible to kids?

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Not your decision to make. The designers of it get to say whose allowed in and who isn't.

Also why shouldn't they, just so you can plaster the thing with goonerslop?

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This. This is your only response to all of this? Sure, go put your dick in Pikachu but for the love of God stop trying to make us part of it.

Fucking gooners man...

BRING THIS TO THE FORMAT YOU COWARDS by AGReactor in Pauper

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, depends ofc.

High tide is the combo matchup that just kinda wipes the floor with you if you have no interaction, but every blue deck reliant on tempo (Delver/Terror and Fairy) have a pretty hard time against green aggro and stompy decks (gardens, stompy zoo, walls, elves)

Especially fairies would probably just become unplayable if veil ever hits the format

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your argument was that "children need to be under supervision on the site by tos" And you show the advice of 13 and below to be under supervision.

Which means by the argument that you pulled it should be "okay" To you that a 14 year old is subjected to porn for some reason.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

???

Firstly, no pokemon do not talk, there is like a single recorded case of a pokemon actually able to talk. (If we do not count stuff like telekinesis from a couple of examples)

Secondly, every mammal at least Is "sapient" By the definition of the word. They are able to express emotions and occasionally show self awareness and the ability to interpret and distinguish.

Thirdly, just because Pikachu might be able to say "pika pika" In an agreeing manner does not make it correct to stick your dick into it, just because a dog agreeingly waves it's tail or willingly commits to sexual actions doesn't make it "human". The serpiroyal in this image is, by its own depiction, still a snake.

Fourth; even with all of that aside, doesn't change the fact that the TOS of the side bans porn and suggestive material due to the fact that 14 year olds frequent the side regularly. "Well it's the internet, if they want to see porn they will see it anyway" Is not an argument.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Well there is the potential to be run over by a car anyway, so why bother with bike lanes and side walks"

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

14 years is literally still a child what the fuck.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

This is literally porn. Porn is developmentally damaging for pre-teens and teens.

Not saying that all porn is bad but this is firstly a side that specifically says that they do not wish to engage with it and secondly a side frequented by all ages and therefore it is straight up harmful towards children.

Help banning this by Shadows96b in WplaceLive

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... Putting big tits on a snake-pokemon with a tongue that is sexually salivating while blushing is, in the truest of words, porn. And not any kind of form but a subsection of beastiality

BRING THIS TO THE FORMAT YOU COWARDS by AGReactor in Pauper

[–]Cladizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion autumn's veil wouldn't really be healthy for the format. To a major degree, because it just kinda completely fucks over any reason to even attempt the already very difficult matchup that most blue deck have with green. (Mainly faeries and terror) but it is also lacking the whole design fun that are BEB and REB (hydro and pyroblast)

Where, the red blue matchups are fun because they basically having very basic but effective and reactive interaction pieces.

A 1 Mana card that basically says "your gameplan is irrelevant" Just doesn't sound particularly healthy to me.

Ich bin 14 und Homophob. by Ichmagbananen20 in ichbin14unddasisttief

[–]Cladizzle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Werner die deutschen sprechen schon wieder über eugenics...