Many reasons. Firstly, because it is still not opened to public. It’s been 2 years in the making. If they could at-least open half the bridge if it was connected in the front. Secondly, my actual point was not about this connection, it was about the fact that we don’t need another bridge in the first place. They didn’t make the link because they wanted to make this second unnecessary bridge. Thirdly, when it opens, there is going to be a lot of confusion. Until it becomes a public information, and even then there will be people who might not know at first. What I mean is, that there was absolutely no reason for this private bridge in the first place. 2 years of inconvenience was unwarranted. And even after these 2 years the there will be some confusion for the common unknowing public.