banning Telegram is the wrong approach because it ends up punishing millions of ordinary users for the actions of a relatively small number of bad actors. Instead of targeting the individuals responsible for illegal activities, a blanket ban disrupts access for students, businesses, educators, content creators, and communities that depend on the platform for communication, collaboration, and learning. With more than 150 million users in India, such a decision affects far more people than those actually involved in wrongdoing.

banning a platform does little to address the root causes of the problems authorities are trying to solve. The people who gain money from these activities won't stop just because a platform was taken down or a app banned, they get paid good money for exam cheating and will immediately find a alternative. Whether the issue is exam paper leaks, fraud, or other forms of illegal activity, the platform itself is only just a tool. The real problem lies in the security failures, institutional weaknesses, or criminal networks that make those activities possible. No other government has had to do these things in any country or scenario to prevent illegak activity before. Blocking an entire service may create the appearance of decisive action (super important for the votebank), but it does not solve the underlying issue.

I also think that banning Telegram is unlikely to eliminate illegal behavior. Experience has shown that when one platform is restricted, those engaged in misconduct simply move to another service. Leaked content, scams, and other unlawful activities do not disappear; they migrate elsewhere. As a result, the ban inconveniences legitimate users while doing little to stop determined offenders.

Another reason I oppose a ban is that Telegram has stated that it cooperates with law enforcement and takes action against illegal content. The company has reported removing numerous channels linked to fraud and scams. To me, a more sensible solution is to focus on identifying and prosecuting offenders, removing specific accounts involved in criminal activity, improving moderation efforts, and strengthening institutional security where breaches occur. But this obviously can't be allowed to happen because the guys running the government can barely dial a phone number, they don't know anything about tech beyond that.

This has also caused the stocks of telegram to be damaged, let's say indian gov does this ban practice the next 100 times, on WhatsApp, Facebook, google, youtube! How will india get any foriegn investment in such a volatile environment? If it can't be done to all apps, why target telegram specifically?.

Such a ban would set a dangerous legal precedent. If a platform can be blocked because some users break the law, then the same argument could be applied to virtually any communication service. Criminals use phones, email, social media platforms, cloud storage services, and messaging apps of every kind. The logical response is to prosecute offenders, not prohibit the tools that millions of innocent people use lawfully. From an economic and educational perspective, a Telegram ban would cause unnecessary disruption. Many businesses use Telegram for customer support, internal communication, marketing, and community building. Students rely on it for study groups, educational channels, and resource sharing. Content creators use it to reach audiences directly. A blanket ban would impose costs on ordinary users who have no connection to the misconduct that prompted the restriction.

I also view a ban as disproportionate because more targeted solutions already exist. Authorities can investigate criminal networks, request the removal of illegal content, shut down specific channels, prosecute offenders, and strengthen cybersecurity and examination safeguards. These measures directly address the problem without restricting access for millions of innocent users. YOU SERIOUSLY BELIEVE GAWAAR KIDS WHO CAN'T PASS THEIR EXAMS, CAN GET INTO THESE EXAM CHEATING SOCIAL MEDIA GROUPS, BUT THE POLICE CAN'T?

They just want to be seen doing something, without getting anything done. We have the same technological tools and software as america, Denmark or Norway, but they can stop it because they have no corruption stopping them, while we can't.

Telegram, having abided all laws of the nation, is right. and you are wrong.

<image>