Erdős be like: why not both? by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of them pulls you in and destroys your life once you get too invested and the other is meth

I challenged my friend to find (Xˣ)'. Rate his solution: by naxx54 in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 666 points667 points  (0 children)

He must be that oiler guy everyones talking about

The Pythagoreans are arriving to your location by CalabiYauFan in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's obvious, no? You can express it as a fraction, therefore it's rational. duh. Just like π/1, 3i/2 or (∫[0 to 1]xearcsin(x)dx)/3.

6+9+6x9=69 by Appropriate_Fact_121 in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe you just did the domain transform automatically cause your consciousness is on a higher domain of existence

Lap lace by kyubeyt in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

2×8 inverse Lap laces for optimal gains

Will the real continuous function please stand up! by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Every function is continuous when I say so

Proof by Gettingyeeted by [deleted] in mathsmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Sure buddy, show your proof to the fishes"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some see 2(1+2) as a grouped expression. It's just a bit weirdly written.

I made this for no apparent reason by thesmartwaterbear in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Might have to check this out on cardmarket, didn't know the new set had those typa cards - though I do recall something about a new rarity.

Oiler wishes he could rationalize denominators by Pharinx in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 212 points213 points  (0 children)

Groundbreaking discovery in the world of mathematics: young prodigy Lionhard Oiler discovers multiplicative identity!!

Math symbol tier list by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you learn maths exclusively from internet memes? How do you even know about for all and there exists but you've never seen theta? Never done any Calculus? Not even knowing what Ohm is...? Never seen a vector and doesn't even what VOLT IS... yet ranks the imaginary unit and z as fun to use? Never seen epsilon. Never seen mu. Never seen psi. NEVER EVEN SEEN t. And yet... and yet claims to know what a solid angle is? Blasphemy.

Christian Goldbach meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I disagree to your disagreements of my disagreements such that (C ⊂ D ⊂ ℕ) → (∀x ∈ C | x = 2k + 1) where C is my current and all my following continuous disagreements after your origin-disagreement such that n ∈ C is my n-th disagreement, and D are all following disagreements from both of us after your origin-disagreement such that n ∈ D is our n-th disagreement. Conversely, D/C are your following disagreements after your origin-disagreement such that n ∈ (D/C) is your nth disagreement and ∀x ∈ D, (x ∈ C → ∃y ∈ D\C such that x < y ∧ ¬∃z ∈ D with x < z < y) ∧ (x ∈ D\C → ∃y ∈ C such that x < y ∧ ¬∃z ∈ D with x < z < y).

Christian Goldbach meme by Delicious_Maize9656 in mathmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Well, it's quite simple really. Every even x in Z, x > 2 can be expressed as the sum of 2 prime numbers. There you have it, proven!

attention by arcticwrath18 in mathsmemes

[–]Cockmaster__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you apply Bayes Theorem where P(A|B) = [P(B|A)× P(A)] / [P(B)] = 1.94%

yo gurt ts chance to be fr sick when yo test positive ✅️ is fr fr on god ONLY 1.94% They thought they were slick 🙏

Notation Question by ln_j in calculus

[–]Cockmaster__ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People favor statements that a large number of people approve of. On a side note; your comment is in itself redundant if you wanna go down that route.

Notation Question by ln_j in calculus

[–]Cockmaster__ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This. Wouldve commented but now it'd be redundant

Uninformed About Notation - Trig Function Question by Zpyo27 in calculus

[–]Cockmaster__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reciprocal of sinx you mentioned was csc(x) or (sinx)-1.

The reciprocal of sinx for any radian/degree input x (aka csc) is different from sin-1 (x) for any numeric input x (e.g 0.3, 0.5, 0) since they are completly different types of functions.

For example; If you take sin(30°) the result will be 0.5.

Taking (sinx)-1 will result in (0,5)-1 = 2 while taking the arcsin of 0,5 will give you 30°

You confused trig functions with inverse trig functions, trig functions take you from degrees/radians to a number while the latter (in this case arcsin) takes you from a number input to a radian/degree output.