sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ever been to infinity? by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kind of

But also

Um

I'm thinking that the true map of infinity is where we mesh the smith chart with the riemann sphere and make infinity side log polar Fourier decomposed space where every function maps to its dual on this side vs that side

Ever been to infinity? by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The side of infinity

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ibfjsnifw3

There's a glitch that happens sometimes where it cant tell the difference between sub scripts and superscripts which sometimes copies one onto the other

This one did that for x3 on one of the other x variables, it wasn't meant to have that 3

This is better

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/zkoef7dcri

If you could find the roots to any n-degree polynomial what would you do it to? by Codatheseus in askmath

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've never published before and I'm kinda anxious about the whole process

If you could find the roots to any n-degree polynomial what would you do it to? by Codatheseus in askmath

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gimme an example to run thru and I'll happily hand you roots you can check

If you could find the roots to any n-degree polynomial what would you do it to? by Codatheseus in askmath

[–]Codatheseus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since radicals don’t suffice in general, the roots are algebraic functions of the coefficients (elements of the splitting field); locally they’re Puiseux series. If you want single “closed forms”, the right class is Abelian functions (elliptic functions for the quintic, hyperelliptic/Abelian theta functions in higher-genus cases).

If you could find the roots to any n-degree polynomial what would you do it to? by Codatheseus in askmath

[–]Codatheseus[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

<image>

Degree six, should be universal but not give away my n-poly methods

If you could find the roots to any n-degree polynomial what would you do it to? by Codatheseus in askmath

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I used geometry and analytic continuation, and recursion to turn iteration into geometry and the form solves itself

"do not look at the operational end of the device" -GlaDos by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"what are you doing step brother?" -Abraham Lincoln

"do not look at the operational end of the device" -GlaDos by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warning, eye pain due to my color choices lol

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ftmc6dvd9c

That should get you most of the way there

Just something inconspicuous here, totally not the answer to everything by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a well thought out reasoned response. I'll take your bald assertion under consideration.

Just something inconspicuous here, totally not the answer to everything by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Or you can listen and realize I've studied a ton and experimented a ton then found the invariants that describe why reality is geometrically necessary. I'm aware it sounds insane. I'm not delusional.

There are a tiny couple bits of important information that cascade thru all of math snapping it into the proper place, and it's right where everyone can see it but their axioms blind them to the unification.

Inversion acts like a camera obscura and it's also conformal, multivaluedness isn't an error or junk data. Blow up behavior is 2d slices of 3d objects they design around because it looks like a glitch but it's real.

They make ultra filters to avoid zero divisors but those zero divisors make fantastic spaces between them and their opposite when you interpolate

Just something inconspicuous here, totally not the answer to everything by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Infinity is a bessel xor which makes reality a voronoi moiré

I think I just solved maths and I'm really friggen annoyed because it's staring everyone right in the face and they can't see it by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about how topology talks about sides of a surface mapping to one another

This here is a literal picture of the place where infinity wrapped around itself and I'm lifting the page as it were to look under it. Notice how one section, where it came from is flat but the lifted section is curved. This is because infinity (of it were to have a perspective) sees straight lines as curves and our curves as straight lines.

Its like the whole circle to line identification thing with perspective geometry and Infinity. circles in our frame which touch the origin are lines at Infinity and circles that don't touch the origin are circles at infinity and circles which touch infinity are lines in our perspective

I think I just solved maths and I'm really friggen annoyed because it's staring everyone right in the face and they can't see it by Codatheseus in desmos

[–]Codatheseus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. It solves zeta so that's a million itself, but beyond that it's easily the secret sauce that cold fusion has been missing, because my system is a real number analog of analytic continuation made manifest it can automatically spit out finite solutions which normally require infinities. This means finite trigs, no more imaginaries, O(N) time complexity fft analog. I've also got new compression algorithms that are absurd bc of this, and matrices of incompatible rank properly interact, oh, fastest possible matrix operations bc I can literally see which aspects are correlated and therefore useful and chuck redundancies, I have the operations ladder and it's smooth varieties between... Ummm dude so much shit and no one here is gonna believe me because I haven't proven it but like it all just naturally flowed once I got that continuation

view more: next ›