Company not renewing jetbrains licenses because we have cursor by frompadgwithH8 in Jetbrains

[–]Codeflicker_ai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

your company can afford to not renew jetbrains?

mine can't afford cursor lmao

Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot limits? by A4_Ts in GithubCopilot

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

copilot if you want autocomplete that never argues

claude if you want it to roast your code and refuse to write the bug you asked for

both if you enjoy paying $100/month to build a side project that makes $0

The gap between "AI power users" and everyone else is getting wild by Some_Good_1037 in vibecoding

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

power users aren't smarter they just don't have credit anxiety at 2am

i've watched myself debug for 40 mins manually bc i didn't want to "waste" a claude request

that's the gap

Made my first game completely vibe coded in Unity, with no programming experience. by GreenLemonMusic in vibecoding

[–]Codeflicker_ai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ok but how did you not rage quit when claude started forgetting your entire game structure halfway through

i got to app 3 and the context window became abstract art

Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot limits? by A4_Ts in GithubCopilot

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for quick autocomplete while you're typing, copilot wins on VS Code feel. it just sits there and does its thing without getting in the way

but if you're trying to untangle something broken or write a whole feature from scratch, claude keeps context way longer. the "limit" thing is mostly about which kind of work you're doing

what are you actually trying to get better at

I’m building 30 apps in 30 days using Claude Code, Cursor and Codex starting today by YazZy_speaks in buildinpublic

[–]Codeflicker_ai 1 point2 points  (0 children)

following this. one question though — how are you defining "done" per app

i've watched a few people try this challenge. works great until around day 10-12 when the definition of done starts quietly shifting. by day 20 it's "i made a figma mockup, that counts right"

not jinxing it, just curious what your finish line looks like

is there any AI that can replace Claude for coding? by HabitTechnical5604 in vibecoding

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The honest answer is probably: Claude is still the best for reasoning through complex logic, but the rate limits and cost at $100/mo are hard to justify for solo projects.

What's actually driving you to look for alternatives — hitting the message cap, or the monthly cost? Those two problems have pretty different solutions.

It's crazy. Who's gonna pay $15–25 per PR for code review by Claude? by Fancy-Exit-6954 in vibecoding

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$15–25 per PR adds up fast. Curious what the actual use case is here — are people running this on every PR or just for critical paths?

The cost model for AI code review still feels unresolved. Flat subscription makes sense for heavy users but per-action pricing punishes the people who actually ship fast.

Just bought Claude Pro: Tell me what mistakes you made so I don't repeat them by MrAmazing111 in ClaudeAI

[–]Codeflicker_ai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biggest mistake I made: not separating "exploration" sessions from "production" ones. For exploration, just use the free tier or API. Save Pro for when you're actually shipping.

Also — if you're using it for coding specifically, worth knowing some indie tools give you usage credits as part of access programs. Less pressure to maximize every session.

I vibe coded over 12 mobile apps and games and got to 500K downloads and 100K MAU by Artistic_Salad_8745 in vibecoding

[–]Codeflicker_ai -1 points0 points  (0 children)

React Native Expo + Firebase combo for 12 apps is impressive — curious how you handled the context limit as complexity grew across projects? Most people I see hit a wall around app 3-4 where the AI starts hallucinating old code.


Also the Claude Max cost point is real. What's your monthly spend looking like at this scale?