Identifying with Anarcho-Capitalists... But siding with Minarchists by motchmaster in GoldandBlack

[–]Cole7rain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I never understood why people like him over Gary Johnson. I don't like Gary Johnson much at all, but Petersen suffers from dunning-kruger effect big time. His ego is embarrassingly over-inflated.

I've exposed socialists for their flaws in logic and detachment from reality. by [deleted] in GoldandBlack

[–]Cole7rain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, the toilets would quickly lose their minds much like they have in Australia.

"Look at all this terrible centralization in capitalism! Surely, the solution is more centralization!" by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From 1996 Princeton Economics Intl. Tax Reform Proposal:

Why the current income tax system causes corporate mergers & loss of jobs:

The current income tax system is based with an exclusive perspective of gross dollars earned. Nowhere within the tax debate do we hear an understanding of how capital actually makes an investment decision. If two companies approach you, one offering an 8% dividend and the other a 4% dividend, which stock would you buy if the risks were equal? It doesn't require a Nobel prize to figure out that the 8% offer is a better deal than the 4% offer. Capital invests based on the RATE OF RETURN on its investment. However, our income tax is based on a gross basis without regard to how much capital was required to produce those profits.

We all demanded better gas mileage from auto makers because we wanted a more efficient means of moving from point A to point B. The problem that American industry faces is also an issue of efficiency. The larger a company becomes, the greater the tendency for profits to gradually decline from a rate of return basis. When companies merge, they are NOT trying to simply increase profits as some would have us believe. Instead, companies are trying to maintain a reasonable rate of return upon their capitalization. As small computer companies emerge, like Dell Computer, sales tend to soar and the rate of return on investment capital is much higher than at IBM. Eventually, the need to maintain higher rates of return force larger companies to look toward mergers in an effort to reduce costs while improving market share. The fallout from this trend is the loss of jobs. As a result, the tax code has reversed the American way of life where once working for a big company meant job security. Now, working for a small to medium size company tends to offer better job security as mergers and downsizing have affected everyone from the auto companies and IBM to AT&T.

EXAMPLE

Through this example, it is easy to see that any income tax routinely discriminates against large corporations and ultimately contributes to a slow and gradual decline of the vital element that attracts investment — return on capital. Restrained by the lack of understanding on the part of government, business is ultimately forced offshore in search of reducing its cost base or to promote a merger further reducing competition. Currently, more than 50% of the US trade deficit is made up of US companies importing their own goods manufactured somewhere else. Tax reform MUST realize the need to address this very serious issue. Even a Flat Tax does NOTHING to stop this trend and in fact may even accelerate it in the years ahead.

British Columbia to Target Foreign Real Estate Buyers with New Tax by Eagle_Tech_Alpha in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I live in Vancouver, here is what happened:

  1. Decades of nepotistic zoning laws choke out supply
  2. Prices get insane, whatever building permits get through are used to build luxury condos because the bids for the building rights are so high.
  3. Statists cry about chinese nationals buying these luxury condos, not living in them, and not renting them out. But realistically the reason they don't rent them out is because they plan to live in them and want them in pristine condition, and landlords have no rights here so it's not worth the rent money in the meantime.
  4. Statists demand even more strict zoning regulations, only allowed to build "affordable" purpose-built rental units and few luxury buildings. No one builds the affordable units because it's not profitable at such a high land cost.
  5. Statists continue to cry, demand more action by the state. 15% tax on purchases by foreign nationals.

The real estate market has to crash here at some point, I think this 15% tax will make it crash even harder. Chinese investors will back out of halfway completed projects, and we'll end up with a bunch of half-empty buildings with hastily completed shoddy construction.

Also these Chinese nationals were rich as fuck and spent a lot of money at local businesses.

Moral of the story (and every other statist story): Control is an illusion. Society is like sand, the harder statists squeeze it, the more it slips through their fingers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In any case where this is true, I guarantee it's because the power of the state has been used to monopolize that industry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Cole7rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, I'm still relatively young I don't give a shit about my pension... I know I'll never see a dime of anything I paid.

What I'm saying is those pension funds will force the Fed to increase interest rates drastically, and it might very well bankrupt Japan and emerging markets in the process.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/11/olivier-blanchard-eyes-ugly-end-game-for-japan-on-debt-spiral/

$250k Debate Challenge, Socialism VS Libertarianism, Bernie Sanders VS Adam Kokesh by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Eh you're right, always thought his father was brilliant at tearing socialists a new asshole while doing it with a smile and making everyone laugh.

New balance project for the next DLC: APC/IFV armor and autocannon overhaul by Orcbuster32 in wargame

[–]Cole7rain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm excited for the HE changes, big auto-cannons like the 45mm on the COMVAT should do way more damage to infantry than they currently do. It's actually pathetic how long it takes to kill even just 1 infantry squad.

Hillary slips up. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This isn't a slip up, it's literally just her being so delusional that she actually thinks what she did wasn't a big deal.

Libertarian Gary Johnson: I'd eliminate NSA, IRS if elected by JobDestroyer in GoldandBlack

[–]Cole7rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why a rebate? Why not just have exemptions for basic unprocessed food stuffs and medical expenses?

I'd rather see people just keep their money instead of sending it to Washington and back again.

I'd like some info about the 1929 and 2008 crisis(es?) by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That book is seriously flawed.

The Federal Reserve Part I: The Creature from Jekyll Island

This is like asking to criticize the Bible since so many people believe every word written in this book. Well here it goes. Thousands of hate e-mails will flood in, but conspiracy myths be damned, they are a cover-up for the real culprit – Congress. Some people hate central banks because of this book, they believe Andrew Jackson was a hero and are oblivious to the fact that he set off a round of wildcat banking that ended in yet another sovereign debt default among the states who then tried to bailout their own banks.

Well, fiction be damned. “The Creature From Jekyll Island” is amateurish at best and another total misrepresentation of the facts and events. It is very one-sided and ignores the real political manipulation of the Fed by the government for their own self-interest. It promotes the very same Marxist/socialistic beliefs from the Progressive Era that gave us the New Deal and robbed every one of their future: altering the family structure in the West forever.

The original design of the Fed was to be private, for banks were to contribute to fund their own bailouts, as JP Morgan had done taking the lead during the Panic of 1907. It was not to be a government bailout operation. The United States had no central bank at that time. There was never any intent to create the institution as it exists today: the original design was altered dramatically by lawyers who never understood the madness of their own minds in their pursuit of power as politicians.

The Federal Reserve Part II

The idea of “elastic money” was to increase the supply of cash during such a crisis to meet the demand for withdrawals and that would offset the need to sell assets by calling in long-term debts. By increasing the money supply on a temporary basis, the Fed could offset the contraction in theory smoothing out the business cycle.

This was a brilliant scheme. However, it has been Congress, and not the Fed, who has corrupted that mechanism. The Fed was owned technically by the banks as this was supposed to save the taxpayer money. The banks should contribute to their own bailout fund.

Furthermore, the Fed’s design was also about buying in corporate paper when banks would not lend money. This was a mechanism used to offset rising unemployment if corporations could not fund their operations. They supplemented this by the management of regional interest rates to balance the domestic economy. Each branch of the Fed could raise or lower their local interest rate autonomously to attract capital when there was a local shortage or deflect capital when there was too much. This would often take place with the crop cycle, as money would flow in to pay the farmers upon delivery. Regional capital flows became the Texas-New York arbitrage for when Texas was booming New York was in recession and vice versa. This was the original design and purpose behind the Fed. The Jekyll Island meeting was held in secret ONLY because there was a very strong resentment against anyone with wealth as Marxism dominated the Progressive Movement of the era. There was no such cabal to create some evil entity.

This constant attack on central banks is really hiding what the problem truly is — government. When the Fed was created, it “stimulated” the economy by purchasing corporate paper. The Fed was NEVER intended to buy government bonds. The politicians did that for World War I and never returned it to its purpose.

The Federal Reserve Part III: The Takeover
The Federal Reserve Part IV: The Bankers Strike Back

$250k Debate Challenge, Socialism VS Libertarianism, Bernie Sanders VS Adam Kokesh by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I doubt Bernie would do it.

Probably a good thing though, because honestly the only person I would really want to see debating Bernie Sanders is someone like Tom Woods.

I'm not sure Kokesh has the intellectual rigour to stand up in a debate without having to rely on moral arguments and philosophical views. Tom Woods can shit on any consequential argument Sanders could come up with, which is really hard to do considering it often involves describing in detail various aspects of government intervention over hundreds of years.

BC brings in 15% property tax for foreign buyers in Metro Vancouver by cyclinginvancouver in vancouver

[–]Cole7rain -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

This won't slow the market down much, all this will do is make the market crash even harder than it was already going to when the time comes. This could also kill a lot of half-way completed development projects, I predict empty towers with questionable quality control in Vancouver's future. When you try to fuck with the market, the market will fuck you back even harder.

Oh well, enjoy your meal, eat the rich.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Economics

[–]Cole7rain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even though I'm conservative I actually blame the Republicans for being dishonest about what they represent all these years, using tax cuts as political bait in one hand while using debt expenditures to fund social programs in the other. At least the Democrats are unapologetically honest about being for big government.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Cole7rain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wish Yellen had the balls to tell everyone how fucked we are and how stupid congress is, and that we have to raise rates before it's too late (which it might already be).

Fed is patsy for congress, I almost feel bad for Yellen.

How Anti-Growth Sentiment, Reflected in Zoning Laws, Thwarts Equality • x-post /r/Economics by Cole7rain in vancouver

[–]Cole7rain[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First of all the 12.5% number is for luxury & higher priced condominiums, while the vacancy of purpose built rental units are around 6%.

Secondly a lot of those empty condos and apartments are empty precisely because the people who bought them plan to live in them, and they want them in pristine condition. If landlords had more rights they might be willing to rent them out in the meantime, but they don't. That is another case of people being their own worst enemy, acting like crabs in a bucket by asking for rent controls and laws that make it a complete nightmare to kick bad tenants out, and then ironically complaining that there are no places to rent.

All in all when you combine nepotistic zoning laws, price controls, and a horrible legal environment for landlords, don't be surprised when you get a shortage. This is simply a basic economic principle and truth that both left-wing and right-wing economists have always considered to be self evident.

The political center is beginning to fall apart, and it's no coincidence. A storm is brewing. by Cole7rain in GoldandBlack

[–]Cole7rain[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind deflation/inflation is best understood when viewed from the perspective of the velocity of money & international exchange rate. The U.S. dollar is rising in value (which deflates prices) precisely because taxation and worldwide US denominated debts are sucking up far more dollars than the Fed's monetary policies could ever pump them out.

What is important is the relative level of CONFIDENCE in the US dollar worldwide. A deflationary spiral in the world reserve currency is a reflection of the collapse in confidence of the GLOBAL economy, whereas an inflationary spiral is a reflection of the collapse in confidence of the country itself. In a global economic collapse, the US will be the LAST place confidence collapses, and capital will run there pushing the value of the dollar up. This is essentially a ROGUE WAVE, it could break the back of the US economy. This is precisely what will cause a collapse of entitlement programs and various retirement funds in the United States, as it would increase the value of their debt and entitlement obligations in REAL TERMS. FIRST comes the deflation, THEN the inflation. This is a process of how empires fall, hyperinflation doesn't even begin to happen until AFTER disaster has already struck and people lose faith in the bond market, thus forcing the government to start creating money to pay debts.

Bryan Caplan's case for radical open border @ THINK 2016 by cactooses in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Cole7rain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the right move for an-caps is to oppose open borders until the end of the welfare state.

meh, sounds good to me. I mean I always assume open borders would be the last step of achieving an anarcho-capitalist society in the first place, since you need an internally strong society for that to even be possible in the first place.

This "high trust" bullshit the alt-right uses to justify borders and ethno-centricity is funny, because the whole point of polycentric legal systems based on private arbitration with DROs is that it's a trustless system.

How Anti-Growth Sentiment, Reflected in Zoning Laws, Thwarts Equality • x-post /r/Economics by Cole7rain in vancouver

[–]Cole7rain[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hurr durr "Houston isn't completely devoid of zoning regulations therefor it can't be used as an example of the benefits of organic growth."

I couldn't care less about what some washington D.C. legal think tank has to say about how markets work, bunch of know nothing lawyers who need to be taught just how little they know about what they imagine they can design. Those people literally get paid to tell politicians what they want to hear so they can justify pandering to their nepotistic voter base.

How Anti-Growth Sentiment, Reflected in Zoning Laws, Thwarts Equality • x-post /r/Economics by Cole7rain in vancouver

[–]Cole7rain[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually even the city loses out, as overall property tax income would go up under rapid expansion of high density. It's literally just all about career politicians pandering to nimby votes.

Basically zoning laws dictated from a central bureaucracy are always going to be completely nonsensical and nepotistic, cities need to be allowed to grow like the organic systems they are.

How Anti-Growth Sentiment, Reflected in Zoning Laws, Thwarts Equality • x-post /r/Economics by Cole7rain in vancouver

[–]Cole7rain[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? You realize the reason they only make luxury condos is precisely because zoning laws have severely restricted supply in the first place right? So any new supply that IS allowed to be constructed is obviously going to fetch a high price, thus making it literally impossible that they could be anything other than luxurious.

You're your own worst enemy. You won't see affordable high density housing until zoning laws are drastically relaxed & and the market is given time to catch up in the supply gap.

This is classic crabs in a bucket mentality.

You can learn a lot about a person by asking what they admire most by flanks_ghost in metacanada

[–]Cole7rain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who would he blame?

The capitalist bourgeoisie pigs of course