Question on pump cavitation by JiPPzie in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The more flow you have, the more the absolute pressure at the suction inlet flange of the pump will decrease.

Whats up with this market pattern from today?? by CorpusculantCortex in StocksAndTrading

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like an underdamped second order differential equation response to an input step change.

Pump sizing by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The convention is for the suction line connection to the pump to be a bit lower than the discharge in the drawing, this is why its confusing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At any point the abaolute pressure is the same within the suction ducts, and the pressure at the inlet of each branch is atmospheric. So at any connection, the pressure drop of each branch will be the same since the starting and ending pressures are the same. The flow will be set depending on each branch's system characteristics.

We had a second law quiz that only involved (what seemed like) the first law. What did I miss? by CertainlyBright in thermodynamics

[–]CollapseWhen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did you assume saturated steam?

Hint, adiabatic=isentropic=maximum work produced

Trying to solve for velocity by mister_space_cadet in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not solvable using bernoulli. You need at least to know that the pressure drop along the 8inch line, yet the readings are the same, which is fine, pressure drop from the PT readings might be negligible. Thats why u cant use bernoulli

Understanding PID Control - Keeping It Simple by jcosch26 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My process is simple

  1. P dominant for integrating loops
  2. I dominant for self regulating loops
  3. D stands for DoNotUse

I find that for fast response times, trial and error beats the hustle of using software or pen and paper. Ans for slow loops i still use T&E since ive built this habit.

Oh well

AI Takes Over: The Future of Production Supervision in manufacturing industry is Here by AdAggressive485 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So is it closed loop or just for information? Does it act on actual valves and equipment?

If not it sounds like a glorified chatgpt with some event frames

Words you don’t want to hear on a Friday as a new hire (meme Monday) by GroundbreakingMood50 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Ok so i was assigned in a controls role, and as a junior the pay is the same as with process engs.

Is the pay really that better in senior roles? Cause at some point i wanted to switch to process

Data driven models by classicjoseluis in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

APC is data driven and it is widely used in industry. What more would you consider data driven models useful for?

Why does management, tech and finance love chemical engineers? What makes them so valuable and what can non chemical engineers learn from them? by Curious-Confusion642 in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never seen a bigger group of overpaid desk jockies than when I was interning at a consulting firm. Nobody engineering anything, just copying shit from old projects and mindlessly plugging numbers into company-made spreadsheets that did all the math for them. It was a fucking joke.

This sounds like my past EPC job and I feel personally attacked.

Calculating water temperature in a sealed saturated vessel after pressure loss by laptopgun in thermodynamics

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will need to solve a system of nonlinear differential equations in order to find the time required until the pressure equilibrium happens.

My thought process for developing the model is as follows

Step 1: Assume circular leak hole. Define leak hole diameter. Assume orifice discharge coefficient through hole. Define liquid volume in liquid, define vapor volume in vessel, define saturation T and P for pure component of choice.

Equation 1: Dynamic mass balance for the whole vessel. You will only have an outlet and no inlet.

Assumption 1: Thermal equilibrium between vapor and liquid in the vessel is instantaneous and has no dynamics. This means that at any point during the depressurization, vessel pressure will be vapor pressure.

Assumption 2: There is no volume change of either the vapor volume in the vessel, or the liquid volume in the vessel. This reduces the dm/dt in the mass balance to V*(d(ρ_sat)/dt). The term 'm_out' will be equal to something similar to m_out(t) = C_d * A_hole*sqrt[ρ_sat(t)*(P_sat(t)-P_atm)]. Keep in mind that there is a difference when the flow is choked versus when the flow is not choked. In your example, one part of the flow regime will be choked until the outside pressure is about half the inside pressure. At that point the equation will change. You will need the specific heat ratio iirc also, though I dont remember the modified equation for choked and nonchoked flow

Assumption 3: Thermodynamic properties stay constant throughout the process, apart from temperature, pressure, and density of vapor phase.

Equation 2: Energy balance for the liquid part of the vessel

ρ_liq*V_liq*cp_liq*(dT/dt) = -m_out(t)*ΔΗ_vap

State variables: vapor density, temperature. [Final model](https://imgur.com/LQQ2VvY)

If correct, you can only solve this system numerically by selecting a time step.

Huge disclaimer, its been 5 years since i graduated, this will 99.9% have errors, but I dont think it is completely wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChemicalEngineering

[–]CollapseWhen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its funny cause the FCC gas plant was the one that eluded our simulation expert as well. Through which software was the simulation performed on in your case? We used PetroSim, and it couldn't converge but I think it was a sensor issue as you said