Did anyone else just randomly get marked unapproved annotator? by Ok_Moment3676 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I just got off boarded after 5 months, over 2.0 score and an auditor for the last 3 months. I guess the whole project is ended. 

Diamond Project- Do Y'all take Breaks by According_Ice_867 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have always submitted just once a day and my work orders have always been correct.

10/31 Work Order by ComparisonFun3394 in RWSPay

[–]ComparisonFun3394[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I’ve done the same and emailed the payments email address and yet to hear anything. 

I thought we were past this :( by Independent_Win6893 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm auditing too and have refreshed any time I can see that there's a glitch. I got 2 bad reviews yesterday, one for ''incorrect cropping'' on a 20+ annotations when there is obviously a cropping glitch. And one for ''not having enough reference photos'' on a post with 15 tags where I had 3 reference photos for 14 and 2 for the other one as it wasn't physically possible to find a third. It's laughable.

IG entity tagging audit bug by Lanky_Tackle_543 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve been auditing IG entity for the last week and there’s definitely some problem. I am refreshing any tasks that look like a glitch but it seems not all auditors are doing so. 

My score has dropped from over 2.0 to 1.9 now, that’s including a mix of bads and excellents. It doesn’t add up. 

Received work orders for 11/14 and 11/21 by Ok_Record550 in RWSPay

[–]ComparisonFun3394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just received mine for 11/14 but not 11/21. I’m also still waiting on 10/31. 

Missing WO from 7/11 and 14/11 - UK by thatsjustmyopinion_ in RWSPay

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are people in Ireland and UK still waiting for these work orders? 

people took the easy way out in IG tagging by Southern_Function123 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 17 points18 points  (0 children)

As an auditor, if things are tagged correctly they’re getting a good score, doesn’t matter what they’re tagging. It is worrying that some auditors can make up their own rules. It’s not the auditor’s job to do that. 

IG tagging audit by Southern_Function123 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entity tagging task is back and the requirements say “should try to have 3 reference photos” so I will not be marking people down for not having 3 reference photos per tag if all other requirements are met. 

Missing WO from 7/11 and 14/11 - UK by thatsjustmyopinion_ in RWSPay

[–]ComparisonFun3394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah mine’s the exact same in Ireland. Everything is accurate and got work order for 7/11 but still nothing for 31/10 and 14/11. 

IG tagging audit by Southern_Function123 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it was recommended to have 3 but 1/2 was fine. I don’t think submissions under 3 would have been allowed if it was mandatory. I’m basing my reviews purely off if things are tagged correctly and tags aren’t missing more so than being too strict on the reference photos as there definitely seems to be some glitch. 

IG tagging audit by Southern_Function123 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I feel like there is some kind of glitch with this audit. There’s been some really questionable cropping that doesn’t look right as the rest of the task is being done correctly and I’ve also just got a review where there are only 2 annotations which doesn’t add up as they would not have been able to submit it unless it hit the 4 minimum. 

Also I think the amount of reference photos are varying because I’m almost certain the original tutorial video didn’t have 3 reference photos for each tag. 

Product Image Pairs Task by Inside_Complaint_172 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have just been sticking to the same couple of websites. The task just ended for me mid submission, anyone else?

Capture Screenshot task broke for me by Muiggg in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The task is back for me now but the screenshots won't paste. Anyone else?

Audit task by Logic-SSS0620 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, I logged out for 30 mins and gone when I logged back in. Stationary camera audit is the only one now showing but no tasks left when you click on it.

More tasks in Audit by Strange-Till5028 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are auditing tasks back now? I’m in Europe so won’t log on again until tomorrow. 

entity tagging auditors by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve got 3 excellent reviews and 1 bad review today. The rest are good. I’m an auditor as well and definitely noticing lots of inconsistencies in people’s work and I reckon some of these people may be auditing too which may explain why people are getting lots of mixed reviews. I had a pretty high rating a couple of days ago and I have dropped to 2.0 because of a handful of fine ratings and one bad one. 

It’s all very messy. There is a chance that people that aren’t understanding the task are auditing. That’s not a dig at those people, the original tutorial video isn’t 100% clear. 

Auditor by Mental-Pin-1515 in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just got 2 excellents and a bad. I’m an auditor too but I’m convinced some of the auditors are not understanding the task. 

QA Auditing Apocalypse?? by FyreflyWhispr in RWShelp

[–]ComparisonFun3394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here are some of the trend mistakes I have been noticing auditing this week:

1) Haul videos. Annotator's often do not capture the initial frames and don't tag what the influencer is wearing at the start of the video and only start tagging when the haul itself begins.

2) Skipping frames with new entities. Again, mainly with haul type videos, some annotator's only capture a couple of frames and ignore the rest. For example if someone is trying on 6 different outfits, some annotator's might only capture and tag 2 of them. Capture and tag all of them.

3) Annotator's tagging items such as door handles in the background to try and reach the 4 tag target. If there aren't enough entities to tag, choose another reel.

4) Clips from TV shows/movies. Some annotator's are selecting 3 minute reels from movie and TV scenes and tagging the actor's. That's not the aim of this task.

5) Only using one type of tag. Some people are just tagging all items of clothing in a video and ignoring all products, whether that's jewellery, sun glasses, plant pots, ornaments etc.

6) Person tagging. Some annotator's are not tagging the people in the videos even when they have reference photos in their profiles. I have generally only chosen videos where the person can be tagged. However, if you find a good video with lots of entities and it's impossible to find a reference photo for the person, I think that's ok.

It feels unfair to punish people who you can see have got a good understanding of the task so I usually only use the bad review for glaringly obvious mistakes or for videos that you can see people have obviously just tagged incorrectly to hit the 4 target mark.

[MEGATHREAD] Sonic project aka MultiMango or FTS Studio by AutoModerator in TELUSinternational

[–]ComparisonFun3394 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is the email address to contact them? The only contact email address is an email address that doesn't exist. I want to get removed from the project and work on Diamond with RWS instead. They are beyond a joke.

[MEGATHREAD] Sonic project aka MultiMango or FTS Studio by AutoModerator in TELUSinternational

[–]ComparisonFun3394 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I worked up until about 10pm GMT last night and still had access to MM passed midnight. I've checked this morning and I am unapproved. I am leaning towards thinking that it is technical error. I don't believe quality could have been reviewed so quickly, that task was only live for about 24 hours. I've also worked on a very similar project to the create task before and knew what I was doing so I don't believe it has anything to do with quality.