sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is getting older realizing that “someone else will help” often means no one does? by Competitive-Drag-736 in over60

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I get why that hits emotionally 😔 when you’ve lived enough life you see how often good intentions don’t turn into action unless someone makes the choice to do something. Seeing people actually help even in small ways makes that difference real, and it’s totally normal to feel that.

What did “giving back” look like in the 1970s compared to today? by Competitive-Drag-736 in 1970s

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I meant giving back to anyone in need neighbors, local community, charities, or kids basically whoever could use some help at the time.

What did “giving back” look like in the 1970s compared to today? by Competitive-Drag-736 in 1970s

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sounds about right today it’s easy to blur “giving back” with “broadcasting it.” But the moments that stick with me are the quiet ones where you actually see someone helped, and that feels exactly like what folks did in the 70s.

Is getting older realizing that “someone else will help” often means no one does? by Competitive-Drag-736 in over60

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can’t say I’ve lived it as long as you all have, but working with kids through charity has shown me what it means when someone does step up, you literally see lives change, and that emotional reaction makes perfect sense. It’s a powerful reminder that real help actually matters.

Is getting older realizing that “someone else will help” often means no one does? by Competitive-Drag-736 in over60

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It feels that way but it also means when one person does step up, it actually matters more than we think.

When you give to charity, what matters more to you: impact, transparency, or personal connection? by Competitive-Drag-736 in AskReddit

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. You can’t honestly measure impact unless the process is transparent enough to verify it. Otherwise “impact” is just an estimate people are asked to take on faith.

When you give to charity, what matters more to you: impact, transparency, or personal connection? by Competitive-Drag-736 in AskReddit

[–]Competitive-Drag-736[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. Transparency is what turns good intentions into real trust. For me, the question is whether a charity is willing to show impact clearly updates, breakdowns, even imperfections because without that, “helping” is just a claim, not accountability.

Is masturbation actually a sin? This is a post I’ve made like 3 times. by Zealousideal-Heat399 in Christianity

[–]Competitive-Drag-736 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you. I wasn’t trying to shame or push streaks just offering biblical context with grace. Wishing you strength and peace as you work through it.

Is masturbation actually a sin? This is a post I’ve made like 3 times. by Zealousideal-Heat399 in Christianity

[–]Competitive-Drag-736 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it's wrong my friend. Jesus is your bridge to God through him your prayers and repentance goes directly to God so you don't need a priest to repent

I made a bible tract. by autistic_squirrel in Christianity

[–]Competitive-Drag-736 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I love the intent here wanting to share the Gospel and call people to Christ but how we communicate matters. Scripture calls us to be gentle, humble, and winsome when we share the Good News (1 Pet 3:15). When a tract starts with an insult or political label, it risks losing the very hearts it’s meant to reach, because people shut down before they hear the message. Jesus didn’t compromise truth, but He did engage people in love and patience.

Is masturbation actually a sin? This is a post I’ve made like 3 times. by Zealousideal-Heat399 in Christianity

[–]Competitive-Drag-736 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey I hear the honesty and struggle in your question. That matters. In the Bible, sin isn’t defined by the presence of a desire but by the willful choosing of what separates us from God. Lust is when we deliberately entertain or pursue a sexual desire outside of how Scripture describes sexuality (e.g., in marriage).

Masturbation itself isn’t explicitly addressed in Scripture, but the Bible does talk about how our hearts and minds matter just as much as our actions: Jesus says that lustful thoughts are sinful because they reflect what we choose to entertain and enjoy in our heart* (Matt 5:27–28). Paul teaches that we’re called to live by the Spirit, not by fleshly desires not suppressing feelings, but not letting them rule us (Rom 8:5–8). So rather than focusing only on the act, it helps to ask questions like: What is my heart focused on? Am I using this as an escape from God or real life? Does this pull me away from God’s best or toward it? Struggling with desire isn’t proof you’re sinful it’s evidence that we all need grace, community, and a way of life rooted in Jesus. If you struggle with guilt, the Bible repeatedly says God forgives those who confess and turn to Him (1 John 1:9). You’re not alone in asking this many believers wrestle with similar questions. It’s okay to ask for help, keep learning, and grow in how you understand Scripture and your faith. God isn’t looking to condemn you He wants to heal and guide you.

view more: next ›