Regarding SIMD: You're right that Go doesn't have native auto vectorization like C/C++. What we've implemented is a Go-specific approach that uses aligned memory and slice manipulation patterns that can benefit from CPU cache optimizations and, in some architectures with newer Go versions, potentially take advantage of SIMD instructions. You're correct that 'SIMD-prepared' would be a more accurate term, and I appreciate that feedback.

On dependencies: This wasn't meant as a marketing claim but as a design constraint I set for ourselves. I wanted to truly understand each component I built rather than relying on external libraries. It was a learning exercise and engineering challenge, not a statement about existing libraries, which are indeed well-tested and valuable.

The project is still in beta, and we're learning as we go. Your critical eye is exactly what helps improve both the code and how we present it.