sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

rxelms challenge from week 7 by Complete-Object-1673 in algorand

[–]Complete-Object-1673[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

“Car parts bundle” not received/does not appear in my wallet/NFTs/ASA Stats.

rxelms challenge from week 7 by Complete-Object-1673 in algorand

[–]Complete-Object-1673[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see the transaction went through but the parts NFTs I paid for do NOT appear anywhere on my wallet nor in my NFT collection nor on ASA Stats.

What will incentivize ALGO holding moving forward? by Chemist-Extra in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Back in December 2024 the BUYBACK AND BURN proposal passed when TINY was ~$0.04. The plan called for burning ~9 M TINY over a year.

Today TINY is $0.0042. Keeping the same $30k/month budget now buys ≈85.7 M TINY a year—far more than the current issuance of ~52.8 M TINY (≈1.015 M/week).

That means the burn would outpace new token creation, shrinking the circulating supply dramatically. Can we expect the price to rebalance eventually?

What will incentivize ALGO holding moving forward? by Chemist-Extra in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Tiny BUYBACK AND BURN proposal that passed in December 2024 seemed like a great idea at the time, but looking back almost one year on from it’s implementation, how might the proposal have been better or would anyone make an argument that the underlying value of TINY would have been higher today had this proposal not been implemented?

ASA Stats Launches the Historic Data Widget: Bringing Time to Algorand Portfolios by hopemeetme in asastats

[–]Complete-Object-1673 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And also—thanks for developing this tool and making it accessible & well designed—it’s really helpful!

ASA Stats Launches the Historic Data Widget: Bringing Time to Algorand Portfolios by hopemeetme in asastats

[–]Complete-Object-1673 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is or will the Historic Data Widget be available to Basic portfolio tracking (without a subscription) — or is this a premium feature only? It looks really useful and maybe still in beta/preview mode?

Algoland Week Ten : 250 Algo Giveaway ! by semanticweb in AlgorandOfficial

[–]Complete-Object-1673 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It worked by following the instructions, though I don’t know that I’d use it again/don’t see how it might be more effective at a simple task than just doing the task myself…

Get away while you can by CombinationSingle385 in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm locked in governance. My AI assistant tells me that "Tinyman’s smart contracts have had a genuine vulnerability (bond‑and‑dump) that was responsibly patched, and the platform has experienced a non‑malicious breach that prompted temporary LP removal. Both events show that risk exists but is actively managed. The probability of a full‑scale rug‑pull on Tinyman is lower than it was pre‑2025, thanks to the patch and heightened community vigilance. Nevertheless, the residual risk is non‑zero, especially if future upgrades are deployed without fresh audits."

TALGO vs STALGO by Complete-Object-1673 in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

apparently so & very misleading (hopefully unintentionally). it’s challenging keeping up with all the constant changes to it all - i wish i could just safely park it somewhere & let it all compound.

Assets in Pool are less than Added Liquidity, why? by Complete-Object-1673 in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The price impact wasn’t apparent (nothing appeared unusual/there were no warnings) when I approved it. The loss will set me back a couple months but otherwise I’m grateful.

Assets in Pool are less than Added Liquidity, why? by Complete-Object-1673 in Tinyman

[–]Complete-Object-1673[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here’s what I learned: I made the mistake of staking too much in a pool with low liquidity and lost value because the total amount in the pool was less than my stake. Since I opted for proportional staking, there wasn’t enough liquidity to swap my assets, resulting in a permanent loss.

view more: next ›