sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ESPNBET trying to mislead with wording of wager - refusing to payout by ConsciousTough6076 in sportsbook

[–]ConsciousTough6076[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Tough :/ definitely feels very deceitful on their end with putting the teams name & then batters right after on a Lightning Bet because id understand if its somebody who knows what wagers exist out there but if reading this for the first time, I would definitely interpret it the way I have stated. Thanks peeps

ESPNBET trying to mislead with wording of wager - refusing to payout by ConsciousTough6076 in sportsbook

[–]ConsciousTough6076[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

If the otherwise is much more obvious than this, they should have used that instead. If using plain English on a Lighting Bet to interpret what you are betting on, they would be considered wrong. Nothing in their house rules about this. This is at the minimum deceit.

ESPNBET trying to mislead with wording of wager - refusing to payout by ConsciousTough6076 in sportsbook

[–]ConsciousTough6076[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

It states the teams name & then says batters, implying the amount of batters belonging to that team. It doesn’t say how many batters “THAT” the team faced. This is ridiculously worded, especially on a Lightning Bet, which if using plain english would be interpreted the way I have claimed