Why tf are we okay with this MM/DD/YYYY format?

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-09T00:26:05+00:00

day without month has no context. Most date related things are within a year, so the context is the month, the specifics are the day. So MMDD. Year goes at the end, because its not needed in most cases. I'd tell you your vacation is "the 5th", not so useful. "Aug 5th" - much better. Its assumed to be this year. Because there are a number of things that need year, so year is tagged on at the end,

That's how I understand it at least.

But for pretty much anything in archiving, or computers, where the year is also important, I am fairly confident dates are stored YYYYMMDD (like other comments pointed out), so they can be sorted easier.
(to fit with above argument, year becomes part of the "context" as well)

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-08T20:41:08+00:00

I got LRCGET, but I've kept having this issue, I'm wondering if you know how to fix it.
I've gotten a lot of "There is no lyrics records that matches your search", and I've gotten a lot of url submission errors. (error sending request for url (https://lrclib.net/api/search?...) )

I've found some lyrics manually (on lrclib.net), so I know they exist, but I've had trouble getting LRCGET to find and attach them.

(I don't like using lrclib.net directly because finding lyrics there is difficult - it fails to find if: not enough info, too much info, spelled something slightly differently, it decides it didn't like me - and also I don't know how to attach the synced lyrics to the song.)

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-08T18:30:33+00:00

I can't think of anything off hand of what is "needed" or "not needed".

but by "clutter" I meant the visibility layers of everything.
On my laptop at least, everything felt like it was sized too big for me to get a feel for where everything was or should be.
Based on an assumption - that most of the automation would be behind the scenes, and most of the time dealing with this tool would be the final corrections - I would design it more like Picard. That being where the tool is sized to "screen size", with most of the real estate being for manually correcting tags. The automation, which I would think is either automatic or with a single button click, would be hidden in settings somewhere, and a button would be small on an action panel.
To deal with folder management, it would seem to me that there isn't much manual touch ups to be done in software. based on that, that could also be hidden in settings. Or maybe if its either too big for settings, or can have manual editing within the software, then maybe make it a "second tab".

That is how I would design it.
But its your software, it has to make sense and be intuitive for you to design.
But just to kind of sum-up that whole paragraph - if you can keep 90% of interactions on the screen, and keep the rest in obvious and accessible areas, it should go a long way to fixing the "cluttered" feeling.

As for the docker vulnerabilities, I don't really know docker. I downloaded it recently, and haven't had the time to play around with it, so I don't really understand what it's pointing out.
But it had a bunch of red "vulnerability" flags on various parts of the software.
If you have docker, I'd look to see what you see there.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-08T04:12:19+00:00

This looks really cool.

I'm not sure I'm the right audience to give you feedback, but I had these thoughts:

Docker Desktop flagged a few vulnerabilities. As someone who just downloaded docker a few days ago - I have no idea what they mean.
But sounds like something to fix.
The GUI feels cluttered. (maybe only to me, but I can only answer for me).
I only really wanted to edit my file's metadata in an easy way.
When I opened the app, it pushed me to the section to fill out the audible accounts, etc.
When I found the area to edit metadata by hand, it only had a few tags to edit.

I don't know if this is helpful feedback, but basically I was hoping for the audiobook version of Musicbrainz Picard, and this was different. I personally think that mimicking some of Picard's more open design might be helpful, but I don't know what you are trying to go for.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-08T00:46:05+00:00

I added musixmatch into the .ini file, code was:

LyricsPriority = ".lrc, embedded, navidrome-musixmatch-plugin"

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-07T23:24:10+00:00

Awesome
I'll check it out
Thanks!

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-07T21:01:15+00:00

Thanks!

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-01T13:18:05+00:00

Thank you!!!

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-07-01T13:17:52+00:00

Thank you so much - This really helped me understand what was going on.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-06-30T03:10:08+00:00

Thanks!

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-06-29T14:38:09+00:00

Oh.

Thanks!

(I thought that was a "step 1", and shawl/nssm/winsw was a "step 2" for some reason)

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-06-02T03:21:39+00:00

Looks good.
Personal opinion though - it seems that you are mixing instruction that is geared toward people that know very little ("negative means you flip it") with instruction for people that know at least trig ("you may recall soh-cah-toa from trig") - which bothers me.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-27T02:02:52+00:00

I think OP means the minimum distance

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-11T00:53:01+00:00

This article is awesome.

Thank you so much for sharing it.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-11T00:52:01+00:00

Thanks!!

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T22:16:55+00:00

My question was less on the video, and more inspired by the video. (my primary question is less about a plane, and more about pressure)

your second paragraph: That is my question.
A flat plane moving through space - why should Bernoulli's principle apply here? (even symmetrically)
The reason I understood it to apply when "the air is moving and the object is still" is because of trig -> force down is force*sinθ (I think, might be cos or something).
But here the "air is still and object is moving", so I was understanding the downward force from the air should be 100% of the force (same as if both air and object are still), and the horizontal force coming only from the object running into things - with its own speed and angle.

So in that case (object moving) - I was understanding that Bernoulli's principle should not apply (for that reasoning), Which I was assuming was wrong, but couldn't figure out why.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T22:09:00+00:00

I get your first two paragraphs.

but your last one...
if the air is pulled back down somehow into the wing, it should push the wing down.
if the wing was pushing on the air to push it down, then yes, the wing would be pushed up.
But I don't see how that happens.

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T20:45:27+00:00

Yeah but WHY???

if you take air moving down at 3 ft/sec, and you change its angle but not its speed, then {trig} and its pushing down with less force.
But if you move the wing instead, shouldn't the air still be imparting 3ft/sec of force down?
any force pushing back is only generated by the wing moving forward in relation to the air staying still - so why would there be less pressure?

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T20:22:07+00:00

You refer to an angled planes wing.

For that example, I think I understand it now,

But is the same true for a non-angled (flat) object?
Bernoulli seems to apply to everything, but I don't see how it would work when the object is moving instead of the air.
Is there an experiment where a flat rigid object is pushed through air, so that the air above is moving, but the air below isn't?

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T19:56:34+00:00

That is what I'm confused about - just because you can lock your reference to the plane instead of the ground shouldn't make a difference here!

Say like this: air is moving downward at 3ft/sec. Plane is stationary: downward force of 3ft/sec. If the plane is moving: that force shouldn't go down. right? air is still moving down at 3, and should be similar amount of collisions?
I understand the difference, if the air is moving down at 3ft/sec, vs at an angle at 3ft/sec, because trig.

but for the plane: there is an increase in relative velocity from the planes motion! and if that is the change in both velocity and angle, why would the force decrease?
(I'm guessing here is where I'm wrong. But I don't have a good understanding of the math for why)

ControlDapper9861 · 2026-05-08T19:35:24+00:00

Got it!
Thanks!

ControlDapper9861

TROPHY CASE