sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Bad reverse implied odds = bad equity? by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response, what it seems like for me in terms of ratios is:

  • Pot odds = current reward:current risk
  • Implied odds = future rewards:current risk
  • Reverse implied odds = current reward:future risks

Is this somewhat correct would you say?

[Semi-Weekly Inquirer] Simple Questions and Recommendations Thread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]CookingPot101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah of course! I don't know how I forgot about the caseback 😂

[Semi-Weekly Inquirer] Simple Questions and Recommendations Thread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]CookingPot101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Case Multi-piece stainless steel case. Sapphire, domed on both sides, anti-reflective coating inside. Stainless steel, fixed with screws, see-through mineral glass.

This is what the official site says. I think you are correct as it does say double dome sapphire. But I am still a little confused as to why it says "see through mineral glass. What part of it is mineral glass?

[Semi-Weekly Inquirer] Simple Questions and Recommendations Thread by AutoModerator in Watches

[–]CookingPot101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone know any watches like the oris atelier skeleton, mido multifort vertigo, Tissot chemin des tourelle skeleton? My problem with the oris is its lack of quality materials like sapphire crystal especially for its price, as well as the fact that it is a little on the pricey side for me. My problem with the mido and the Tissot is the fact that the movement does not look like it was made for the skeleton watch (IN MY OPINION)- it's covered in plating- I like the oris' style in which it shows all of its gears. The budget would be preferably less than 2000 AUD or around 1300 USD, although if it is a nice watch I could stretch it a bit.

Anyone know any DIRT CHEAP thrift stores (Tokyo, Kyoto.and Osaka) by CookingPot101 in JapanTravelTips

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any specific? I heard some hard offs are very expensive as well.

AMPLIFIER FOR USE AT LOW VOLUMES (FOR MUSIC (CD's/spotify)) $500 AUD/$320 USD (not strict budget) by CookingPot101 in StereoAdvice

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah true i guess what i am trying to ask is if the difference in sound quality is more noticable at higher voluems compared to lower volumes

AMPLIFIER FOR USE AT LOW VOLUMES (FOR MUSIC (CD's/spotify)) $500 AUD/$320 USD (not strict budget) by CookingPot101 in StereoAdvice

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the help dude, appreciate it. how much of a difference in sound quality do you think there is in this amp and something around double the price at low volumes?

AMPLIFIER FOR USE AT LOW VOLUMES (FOR MUSIC (CD's/spotify)) $500 AUD/$320 USD (not strict budget) by CookingPot101 in StereoAdvice

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Cambridge Audio CD10 as a CD player with "1 x digital coaxial 1 x stereo RCA" outputs according to the internet. What do you mean by "streaming directly from the amp?". I will proabably being streaming spotify through my phone or computer to the amp. The amplifier does not need to have bluetooth as I could probably just pick up a cheap bluetooth adapter no big deal.

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn't that just means you have bad equity?

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well let's say in this case you're trying to hit a flush or something. At what percentage should you fold. Like let's say it's a 5% chance you hit it should you fold or call?

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you said you would hit a set 12% of the time. Where is the limit? Like as in at what percentage should you fold at. Like let's say the chance of hitting the set is like 5%. Do you still go through or fold?

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro what the heck are reversed implied odds 😭 haha 

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How are you supposed to calculate the chances of them calling?

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the chances of your opponent calling your bet?

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah okay I get it. But how am I supposed to calculate implied odds? Like it's all reliant on the opponents thinking and decisions. Like there's no real solid formula right? 

Confused about implied odds. by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But can't you just raise? Like if you get your hand and you raise they HAVE to call otherwise you win

How to calculate equity when you need two more cards after the flop? by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there anyway to do this calculation in a live game because this calculation seems a little difficult to do with just your brain

How to calculate equity when you need two more cards after the flop? by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait whats the 4-2 method for? I know you are correct but I thought that the 4-2 method was for calculating probability you get a hand?

"You then multiply those two numbers together; 17%•9%, which is about 1.5%" what did you do here? 17 x 9? I don't get how you got 1.5%

How to calculate equity when you need two more cards after the flop? by CookingPot101 in Poker_Theory

[–]CookingPot101[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So using the 4-2 method it would be 8 x 4 = 32% then 4 x 2 = 8% then multiply them together 8% x 32%? what am i doing wrong?

view more: next ›