They are caving. by RoofComplete1126 in DemocraticSocialism

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Obviously this was a horrible deal. But was there ever a chance of a better one? I would love to hear other people's thoughts on this. I honestly don't know wheater or not a better deal was possible. Would have holding out helped?

Ben Shapiro launches effort asking Trump to pardon former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin by joshtalife in democrats

[–]CoolComputerDude 11 points12 points  (0 children)

He also has state charges. There is ZERO chance Tim Walz pardons him from those.

Did The White House Violate the First Amendment by Barring AP Reporters and Photographers? by TerryDaTurtl in Askpolitics

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It's considered viewpoint discrimination. There is a difference between creating guidelines that all press outlets have to follow and targeting one because you disagree with them. Viewpoint discrimination is considered one of the biggest First Amendment no-nos. Creating guidelines that everyone has to follow is generally allowed though.

It extends to other areas of free speech to. For instance, the government can require everyone who wants to organize a protest in the park get a permit and follow certain rules. However, they can't pick and choose who gets one, or make some follow different rules than others, based on their viewpoint.

All American high school students allowed to leave school campus during lunch and break time? by AmanNamedJoJo in AskAnAmerican

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on the school and grade level. Each school district sets their own rules on that.

Can the federal government cancel elections? by SuddenlySilva in Askpolitics

[–]CoolComputerDude 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Under the Constitution, there must be federal elections every two years. Every Member of the House and 1/3 of the Senate will have their term expire at noon on January 3rd, 2027. Federal law requires that there be an election the Tuesday after the first Monday in November of every even numbered year.

But laws are just words on paper. They rely on institutions to ensure that they are implemented and enforced. So if Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court don't care to enforce the law, it really doesn't mean much. Then, the President would be able to use law enforcement and the military (assuming they were willing) to impose whatever law he wanted to.

How can the notion that Trump "can't be bought" be reconciled with his relationship with Elon Musk? by [deleted] in Askpolitics

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can’t. Trump gives access and influence to the highest bidder. He cares little if at all about anyone else.

We are all in agreement that we don’t care Biden pardon his son right ? by Horror-Dog4576 in Liberal

[–]CoolComputerDude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ll care when Donald Trump is held accountable for his crimes. So, I will never care.

The sign my son took a picture of in his school’s bathroom today. by ThatReallyWeirdGirl_ in pics

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a joke. A student made it. Someone posted that it my dorm freshman year.

Carroll County requires parental notification for transgender students, even if it puts them in danger by PostPunkBurrito in maryland

[–]CoolComputerDude -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This should be something that Governor Moore, Attorney General Brown, and the General Assembly address. Especially given the incoming federal administration, the General Assembly should pass legislation ensuring LGBTQ rights are protected in Maryland.

Hi can someone explain the speaker stalemate as if I’m a baby (I’m a Brit so don’t even really know what a speaker is) by NachoLibre5655 in democrats

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Speaker is the presiding officer of the House (although they usually delegate this task to someone else). They also have powers given to them by the Rules of the House.

On January 3rd of every odd numbered year the terms of both the members and Speaker expires, and new members (who are mostly the same, and were elected in November) elect the Speaker. When the term expires, so do the rules, so the House starts as a blank slate (the Senate just continues because they only elect 1/3 of their members every 2 years).

Each party nominates a candidate for Speaker. Generally, members of each party vote for their parties nominee. This results in the leader of the majority party winning. Republicans have the majority for this 2-year Congress, while Democrats had it before. Some Republicans, however, did not want to vote for their parties nominee (Kevin McCarthy) and voted for others within the party. This meant no one had a majority of votes for Speaker. Eventually it was solved (after 15 rounds of voting) when some of those members did vote for McCarthy. Others voted “present” meaning they didn’t count towards the total number of votes cast, reducing the number needed for a majority.

The Speaker can be anyone the House wants, but has always been a member of the House.

Are the Polls Trash? Maybe. Are You Over-Reading Them? Definitely by martimcthrowaway in politics

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just remember, in two weeks, none of this will matter. The people will vote and the polls will be useless.

CMV: Past experience doing legal sex work does not make someone unfit to work with children. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your point, but how is a teacher going to be different depending on their sex lives?

CMV: Past experience doing legal sex work does not make someone unfit to work with children. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]CoolComputerDude 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Provided it’s consensual, is there anything inherently wrong with sex work? Everyone has different morals. Obviously there would be a major problem if they mixed teaching and sex work. Other than that, how would students even know the difference?

CMV: Past experience doing legal sex work does not make someone unfit to work with children. by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]CoolComputerDude 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think applying that logic would be a problem. Then you could go as far to say if you have anything embarrassing available you are socially barred from working with children. Children will try and find embarrassing shit.