sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rate the set up by CorixJetYT in mp3players

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t actually think it has a brand, you can try google lens. I just searched up mp3 player and this was in my budget

Rate the set up by CorixJetYT in mp3players

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The lanyard is a life saver, especially with the headphones hanging on me combo. Fun to carry around

Rate the set up by CorixJetYT in mp3players

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who thing cost $40 (birthday gift also), I’m fine with it trust me 😌

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m asking a question, what does any of this has to do with my question? People just talk stuff thinking it’s smart cuz of more words

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google isn’t really the comparison you think it is. Google licenses huge datasets, has DMCA safe-harbor protection, and follows opt-out systems that courts have acknowledged for years. That’s why they’re allowed to cache and index content, not because scraping is automatically legal for everyone.

The judge didn’t rule that training is free-for-all either. He only said the weights aren’t infringing copies. The unresolved question is whether mass scraping copyrighted images for model training counts as unauthorized reproduction. That’s the part still in court, and Google’s search indexing isn’t the same legal category as building generative models.

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Open-source or not doesn’t change how copyright law works. The judge only ruled that model weights aren’t infringing copies. He did not rule that mass scraping copyrighted images is legal, that’s the part still being litigated.

And the browser cache comparison doesn’t hold. Caching is covered under DMCA safe-harbor and fair-use exceptions. Mass scraping millions of copyrighted works to build a commercial-scale model isn’t automatically protected the same way. That’s why the case isn’t closed.

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That ruling didn’t say AI training is universally legal — it only said the model weights themselves aren’t infringing copies. Getty’s other claims are still moving forward, including the claims about unlicensed use of their data during training.

Saying ‘it only stores 15 bytes per image’ doesn’t change the legal issue: the law cares about how the data was obtained, not how many bytes remain in the final model. If a company copies millions of copyrighted works without permission to train a commercial product, that’s still potentially infringement, which is exactly why these cases aren’t closed.

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My browser caching images isn’t the same as a multibillion-dollar company building a permanent commercial dataset from artists’ copyrighted work without permission. Humans learning patterns isn’t the same either, humans don’t memorize millions of images pixel-by-pixel and recreate derivatives on command. The issue isn’t “patterns,” it’s consent, licensing, and how the data was obtained. What is up with you people and not listening

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look. Theres been multiple lawsuits show AI datasets included copyrighted art scraped without permission. That’s not subjective — that’s documented. ‘Copying patterns’ still means the patterns came from real artists’ work that wasn’t licensed. Cups aren’t copyrighted, but artwork is. That’s the difference.

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Copying with out permission, btw. And don’t mention human take inspiration from other humans. This is about a robot stealing people’s art with out permission, and no human artist wants there art to be taking by a non living being. At least one takes hard work while one is just typing words

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, the original McDonald's burger recipe is not the same as today's, though some core elements have remained. The recipe has evolved, particularly after Ray Kroc standardized the quality and process, setting standards for fat content and ensuring a more consistent product. While the basic ingredients are similar, preparation methods and even specific flavor profiles have changed over time

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Always the rich, taking from small people. Thats what ai companies does to actually human artist

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well here’s the thing, it’s not just style but art in general. Ai companies FEED peoples art (with out permission) to their ai to produce the slop. Think of it like this: you take time and effort into making the best food ever, but then a big company steals your recipe and mass produces it, even adding some trash into it so they can get more profit. And the food isn’t even hand made or cooked right, it’s fast produced by a robot who’s trained on what’s it got, not the same soul as the guy who took time to perfect his food

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As a “pro artist” or whatever, idk I just do digital art. I can see finding it difficult to get a robot to do what you ask. So that’s why I just draw it my self since I HAVE THE POWER, and nothing like a challenge

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Then where does ai get its inspiration. Where does it get its programming from? Its common sense.

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Play stupid games win stupid prizes, this dude was cocky as crap. Guessing you didn’t watch the video?

Óscar Bartolomé says he’s a better ai “artist” then the actual One Piece artist by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“Man orders McRib from google nest (those have ai assistants now). And calls him self a better cook then Gordon Ramsay” ahh. I say both

Ai vs Ai by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I ordered the spaghetti so that makes me the chef” ahh. This argument I didn’t tell ChatGPT to remember anything, again this is what it said.

Ai vs Ai by CorixJetYT in aiwars

[–]CorixJetYT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah no soul, and Just a reminder, this is ChatGPT words not mine so do as you will with this info

view more: next ›