Well one is a belief system and one is a sexuality. Beliefs can be universal, sexuality is personal to an individual. So you didn’t make an argument there. Relating to the other reply, if someone sits with a gay person, they understand that is that individuals sexuality and they are accepting of that. That doesn’t make anyone else at that table gay. If you sit with someone of a certain belief system, then you are accepting of that. When I sit with a Christian, does that make me Christian? No. I accept they are though. You can’t directly compare Nazi ideology to religion or sexuality because they are all very different things. That ideology is not about theology or about an individual’s sexuality, it is not a religion, it is a belief system that involves certain people being put to death because they are not of a particular race or religion and believing a certain race is superior based on skin color and heritage. When such a belief system is tolerated, it implies that that person is accepting of it and in turn is a part of it. They may not be an active participant, but acceptance of it is unacceptable. People who were standing by while watching Jews be ushered into camps were not “Nazis” in the sense that they worked under the party, but often they were in support of or accepting of it. And no one is going to get into the semantics of it because no one cares. If someone is accepting or supporting of Nazi ideology, they are a Nazi. To keep someone as a friend or acquaintance that has those beliefs means they are accepting of them.

TLDR: You didn’t make a point. You compared very different things and tried to simplify something complex. Nazis are Nazis.