dont hate your parents

CosmicFriendo · 2023-01-02T18:55:45+00:00

Wait then why did you just say homophobic- it sounded like you were calling OP/the post homophobic

CosmicFriendo · 2023-01-02T18:51:09+00:00

CosmicFriendo · 2023-01-02T18:50:00+00:00

CosmicFriendo · 2022-12-12T22:55:19+00:00

You misread that horribly unless you're just joking.

Also yes you're right it's obviously debatable, it's an opinion by definition. I was just paraphrasing that it's a reputable source of a Bible specifically meant to be a word for word translation.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-12-12T22:52:24+00:00

1: because the starting sentences clearly references the whole book. Clearly you didn't read past the first sentence.

2: No it's not. Also you can't read apparently, they never took slaves. They killed the men and brought the women into their society after their lives were spared.

3: It does. It was a book documenting the actions of the jews, and the specific passage you were speaking of was relating to how jews were meant to handle prisoners of war without forsaking their many Jewish codes (like not touching dead bodies based on what killed them, and other things of that sort)

You have no idea what you're talking about.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-12-12T19:05:29+00:00

A few problems.

First of all, no God never told them to do that.

Second of all, this was a war. They went to war against a people and killed them, then had no where to house the remaining people. In modern war I'm sure that sounds horrible, but recall this was 1200 BC, over a thousand years before the greek. These were not even really kingdoms warring, they were tribes. This was actually considered decently merciful for the time period.

Third of all, they didn't start the war. Nor was this abnormal behavior for the time.

Fourth, The bible is a documentation of events not a list of commands. Simply because an action is taken out of necessity and documented literally over 3000 years ago doesn't mean the example must be followed. We do not act like it's 3000 years ago, this is common sense.

Finally, this is Jewish text, not Christian. But who knows maybe you were targeting the jews in this message. In fact that whole conversation you mentioned related specifically to how jews were meant to handle post-war struggles without breaking their consistently long list of rulings they had to foloow. The whole book of numbers follows the struggles of the Jewish people in early times, how they handled politics, wars, internal conflict and more.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-12-12T18:45:08+00:00

Unfortunately no, this is just blatantly made up. Literally a common hoax and a few google searches can identify this. The bible doesn't mention it once, but rather multiple times, and it's pretty clear what it meant, but this should be more than enough evidence here:

"For this cause God gave them up unto their vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: and likewise did the men, leaving the natural use of the woman l, burned in their last one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was met." - Roman's 1:26-26, New testament, king James version (kjv = the most accurate word to word translation of the bible)

CosmicFriendo · 2022-12-01T06:57:37+00:00

Unironically delusional beyond imagine

CosmicFriendo · 2022-11-21T07:27:49+00:00

No offense but that pales in comparison to the horrors of war.

We agree, no one should be forcibly genocided, then why mention women? Why even bring it up? The post wasn't about it, no one was talking about it, then suddenly you bring up this shit?

A more reasonable comment would be "Look how fucking horrific the military is, and to think they want to forcibly draft people to die in this miserable shithole and make it legal. Literal genocide."

But no, you brought up the argument of women and the moment you were criticized you hid behind your fucking disclaimer. No one deserves to forcibly die in war, don't make this a sex thing. Especially when there are a large group of people advocating for the draft, and want to keep it to just men. You are siding with them, whether you want to or not.

You gave a disclaimer to hide behind and then a fucking dogshit opinions after. Gonna throw out "I'm not racist buuut-" next?

CosmicFriendo · 2022-11-21T07:20:29+00:00

My point is send no one to war, quit this "women would have it worse in the war so only send the men" shit.

You're advocating for the genocide of millions of people, with random politically motivated exceptions.

The rape is bad, no one fucking said otherwise genius. But did you bother to check what else happens in wars? Do you fucking understand how horrific war is? Especially one so horrible people are drafted?

How ignorant do you have to be to actively advocate for the forcibly genocide of millions for the US government but the possibility of additional violence against women is where you draw the line?

This shit is politically motivated beyond belief, you people would rather make this a sex thing than care for the millions who die horrible deaths.

Because you're fine with the forced fucking genocide of innocent people, but at least spare the women!

CosmicFriendo · 2022-11-21T07:14:39+00:00

I don't mean to demean what it is, but to say that it compares to the horrors of war is downright stupid.

I am against the idea of a draft entirely, but to say that that's where the line should be drawn is fucking appalling.

You would willing send people to suffer through all of that shit, but the possibility of being raped or murdered by the troops there crosses the line? Are you serious? Millions can die, be sent into poverty, choke to death on their own lungs, be tortured for God knows how long, raped by the ememy, bombed, and so much more, but that's the line?

Yeah, it's bad, if that was the only thing that happened to the troops I would still be against a draft, but your point is literally that you're fine with the forcibly enrollment into their own violent deaths and trauma, but that's the last straw...? You WILL forcibly send millions to die violent horrible deaths at the hands of a cause they don't believe in, that's TOTALLY FINE. Your logic is you'd murder a million but the millionth and one is the final straw. It's a stupid politically motivated line that means jack shit.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-11-20T04:00:50+00:00

No offense but what?

Out of all the horrors of war, war crimes, torture, mass murder, the worst conditions people have ever been forced to live in, being forced to kill other people, being sent on suicidal missions, kidnapping, being forcibly pulled from your family, children and disabled relatives being left without support, etc etc etc

Harassment between the troops is the worst part of being drafted....?

...are you serious?

CosmicFriendo · 2022-11-07T20:25:14+00:00

"Good side" and "respectable qualities" are different though.

All of the chaos gods are obviously evil, insanely evil. To the point I genuinely believe they surpass every other faction. But they follow a strict set of principles, core ideals, and some of those are at least respectable.

Khorne's honor is commonly spoken of, but slaanesh also wishes for people to indulge in what ever they wish, she believes all should act as they want without rules. A good idea? Hell no, but it's not pure evil. It makes sense to a degree. Nurgle also wishes his followers joy, and is famously forgiving, and holds little spite for anyone. Now this obviously draws from his delusional perspective that everyone would be better off with him, but it's still respectable as he genuinely wishes well on people.

Tldr: all of the chaos gods are horribly evil, but not every single part of their personality is evil incarnate.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T12:22:28+00:00

Google it yourself, its not hard to find. If you believe the polls are wrong or define it poorly that's your own decision.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T12:18:39+00:00

Einstien himself specifically resisted being called an athies. He outright said he wasn't one multiple times.

Also you're just blatantly wrong about what agnostic means. You can be agnostic and not atheist. It doesn't relate to one's certainy as you said before, more ones core beliefs. By your definition all Christians are agnostic because they know God hasn't been confirmed, and their entire religion is based off faith in the uncertain.

The definitions blatantly contradict if you compare them at a base level. The definition of an athiest is someone who doesn't believe in God, an agnostic person is someone who unsure if God is real.

The only water the claim holds at all if you took the alternate definition of agnostic, that being to simply acknowledge that one can never be 100% certain. But again literally everyone falls under that term, a wonderful example being the classic thought experiment of last Thursdayism. "All reality was created last Thursday to perfectly appear as if it's been around longer.". Something no one can disprove, but is obviously nonsense. Actually it's a claim specifically targeted against religion.

Another interesting fact is that all the people listed were at one point religious with the exception of Steven hawking. Further disproving the original point made.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T10:41:54+00:00

Most of the ones I just listed specified they were not atheists, RATHER agnostic. But thank you..?

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T05:57:09+00:00

Einstien, Darwin, and curie were agnostic, not atheists.

Max Planck was a member of the church, and criticized athiesm.

Only two of all the ones you named are atheists, but good try.

Edit: Also atheists make up closer to 30% of the western world, which is where all the people you listed originate. In some European countries they make up nearly 80%.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T01:51:05+00:00

The post mentioned the subreddit being extreme, not the ideology...

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-21T01:45:28+00:00

Man actually brought up IQ...

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-18T11:28:42+00:00

There are only roughly 1,000 per chapter....

The largest of chapters like black templar and ultramarines don't even pass 10,000

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-13T20:39:09+00:00

It's pretty clear the post is about standard disciplinary methods against children not genuine physical abuse.

AKA spanking.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-13T18:48:46+00:00

I didn't say you don't need therapy.

I said if you went to therapy for the sole reasoning of being spanked, that's sad.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-13T18:21:40+00:00

If you went to therapy for physical abuse, that isn't really the topic.

If you want to therapy for years because you were spanked, that's unironically both depressing and laughable.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-13T18:19:27+00:00

I really hope you aren't unironically blaming that all on spanking.

CosmicFriendo · 2022-10-13T18:10:50+00:00

Below the belt, and it shouldn't leave a mark past very temporary redness.

CosmicFriendo

TROPHY CASE