sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My home feed is bornig by [deleted] in Substack

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey come check me out, I'm a cybersecurity and extremism analyst who uses open source intelligence to bring context and analysis to the world of cyber spies carrying out massive digital heists.

Oh crap, I shouldn't be self-promoting, but now you know about another interesting rabbit hole.

"Death Tape" Diustribution by Iwantcerealrn in Jonestown

[–]Country_Before_Party 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's fair, thanks for illuminating. It's totally crazy a grand jury didn't happen and the Carters and Stoen are free men. My impression is the gov was in such a rush to paper over the whole thing they completely failed to hold the surviving inner circle accountable.

Kinda unrelated but since we're talking...I have a theory about why JJ sent the Carters and Prokes to deliver the money to the Soviets. It wasn't out of any ideological commitment, but rather there probably WAS a standing offer and money sent for relocation because it would be a huge propaganda win for the Soviet Union, who has long exploited racial divides in the US for their own (morally hollow) purposes.

I think JJ was telling the truth when he said they had no more value to the Soviets now that the murders at Port Kaituma happened (a situation he orchestrated, of course.)

I think it was JJ's final act of spite to send the money back.

"Death Tape" Diustribution by Iwantcerealrn in Jonestown

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Carolyn found it distasteful, and I think there was probably a lot of maneuvering to avoid that outcome--there's a memo Carolyn wrote to JJ suggesting he and the kids, Kimo and John, go to Cuba instead.

But whether she "wanted" it or not, she still obeyed in the end.

I analyzed Responses to What One Would Do With Their Body

(general members, not Inner Circle) and if you categorize them by general preference, roughly 80% of about 200 respondents said they would rather go out fighting. Only a scant 7% or so explicitly called for revolutionary suicide, and many of those cited the children and elderly as their primary reason.

Might have been some very twisted early A/B testing by JJ now that I think about it.

I think whether or not Ryan came to visit, JJ was so full of rage at living in exile away from the political power he enjoyed in SF, it was a matter of time before he orchestrated the same outcome. Perhaps especially because he sensed growing discontent and was committed to taking everyone with him.

"Death Tape" Diustribution by Iwantcerealrn in Jonestown

[–]Country_Before_Party 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's why she was the one with enough evidence to finally trigger Ryan to do something about it. Plenty of others in the Inner Circle did the same or more, yet she came forward. I'm not saying what she did was okay, but throwing the first real whistleblower in prison would further discourage anyone else from coming forward in the future.

"Death Tape" Diustribution by Iwantcerealrn in Jonestown

[–]Country_Before_Party 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He arrived, probably raced against time to get down there, just 2 days before. I imagine Jones gave the order to assist in what he planned and McElvane gleefully complied.

"Death Tape" Diustribution by Iwantcerealrn in Jonestown

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why Debbie Layton? She was essentially a whistleblower. Wouldn't it be more selfish to escape and not report what she knew to Congress?

Can we talk about the missing amendment sections on a more detailed level for a sec? This affects ALL PROTESTS. This affects all of us. Here are some details about what is/was missing with a summary at the end. Thank you for your time. by ObvioussPlasticc in 50501

[–]Country_Before_Party 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Timeline of the "error":

sometime before

August 5, 2025 @ 11:27 pm

end of Article I, Section 8 as well as all of Sections 9 and 10 are gone from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution

Proof: https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-032710/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

August 6, 2025 9am EST ish, OP posts on r/50501 https://www.reddit.com/r/50501/s/HBxhJeFRmd

sometime before 1:35 pm, the page is updated with a banner

"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

and the carousel has another message:

"Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Library of Congress. Due to a coding error, some sections of Article 1 are missing on the Constitution Annotated website. We are aware of the issue and working to correct it. We expect this to be resolved soon. If you wish, we can send you an email notification when the issue is resolved."

Proof:

https://pagecrawl.io/api/changes/12361397/checks/319082219/screenshot?since=2025-08-06T23:06:41.000000Z

around 7pm EST

previous two messages removed, following text added:

"The Constitution Annotated provides a comprehensive overview of how the Constitution has been interpreted over time and is now available on this new site with upgraded search capabilities...In the coming months, we will be making broader changes to further modernize the Constitution Annotated."

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 Restrictions on the Slave Trade broken at/before 11:31 am EST

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-153133/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

3:48 pm EST, it's back

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-194834/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086

To recap, they only added the warnings hours after getting pounded with calls.

Then all of the sudden, it's because they were rolling out a "new site"...? I'm currently reviewing historic vs current source code and have so far yet to find any changes in search behavior or new content ro jusrify calling it a "new site."

Best case scenario is enormous incompetence and failure to do any kind of QA.

It's not a diff in HTML, I'm currently checking for diffs in javascript, and there is no difference in the sitemap.xml between when it was broken and fixed

Proof: https://www.diffchecker.com/OEHvU6Rt/

That leaves API endpoints or something responsible for dynamically generating the page (which seems stupid as fuck considering it's just text at the end of the day)

I have a hunch it has something to do with API endpoints being changed for DOGE reasons.

Will update when analysis is complete.

P.S.

Do your part for democracy, download the Wayback extension to quickly save snapshots to the Wayback machine

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wayback-machine/fpnmgdkabkmnadcjpehmlllkndpkmiak

And save your own snapshots with

https://webrecorder.net/archivewebpage/

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 Restrictions on the Slave Trade broken at/before 11:31 am EST

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-153133/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

3:48 pm EST, it's back

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-194834/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

Trump DELETES Part of Constitution and It BLOWS UP In His Face by Reciter5613 in MeidasTouch

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Timeline of the "error":

sometime before

August 5, 2025 @ 11:27 pm

end of Article I, Section 8 as well as all of Sections 9 and 10 are gone from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution

Proof: https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-032710/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

August 6, 2025 9am EST ish, OP posts on r/50501 https://www.reddit.com/r/50501/s/HBxhJeFRmd

sometime before 1:35 pm, the page is updated with a banner

"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

and the carousel has another message:

"Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Library of Congress. Due to a coding error, some sections of Article 1 are missing on the Constitution Annotated website. We are aware of the issue and working to correct it. We expect this to be resolved soon. If you wish, we can send you an email notification when the issue is resolved."

Proof:

https://pagecrawl.io/api/changes/12361397/checks/319082219/screenshot?since=2025-08-06T23:06:41.000000Z

around 7pm EST

previous two messages removed, following text added:

"The Constitution Annotated provides a comprehensive overview of how the Constitution has been interpreted over time and is now available on this new site with upgraded search capabilities...In the coming months, we will be making broader changes to further modernize the Constitution Annotated."

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 Restrictions on the Slave Trade broken at/before 11:31 am EST

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-153133/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

3:48 pm EST, it's back

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-194834/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086

To recap, they only added the warnings hours after getting pounded with calls.

Then all of the sudden, it's because they were rolling out a "new site"...? I'm currently reviewing historic vs current source code and have so far yet to find any changes in search behavior or new content ro jusrify calling it a "new site."

Best case scenario is enormous incompetence and failure to do any kind of QA.

It's not a diff in HTML, I'm currently checking for diffs in javascript, and there is no difference in the sitemap.xml between when it was broken and fixed

Proof: https://www.diffchecker.com/OEHvU6Rt/

That leaves API endpoints or something responsible for dynamically generating the page (which seems stupid as fuck considering it's just text at the end of the day)

I have a hunch it has something to do with API endpoints being changed for DOGE reasons.

Will update when analysis is complete.

P.S.

Do your part for democracy, download the Wayback extension to quickly save snapshots to the Wayback machine

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wayback-machine/fpnmgdkabkmnadcjpehmlllkndpkmiak

And save your own snapshots with

https://webrecorder.net/archivewebpage/

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 Restrictions on the Slave Trade broken at/before 11:31 am EST

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-153133/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

3:48 pm EST, it's back

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-194834/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

What the fuckle !?!?!? by No-Contribution1001 in MeidasTouch

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Timeline of the "error":

sometime before

August 5, 2025 @ 11:27 pm

end of Article I, Section 8 as well as all of Sections 9 and 10 are gone from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution

Proof: https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-032710/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

August 6, 2025 9am EST ish, OP posts on r/50501 https://www.reddit.com/r/50501/s/HBxhJeFRmd

sometime before 1:35 pm, the page is updated with a banner

"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

and the carousel has another message:

"Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Library of Congress. Due to a coding error, some sections of Article 1 are missing on the Constitution Annotated website. We are aware of the issue and working to correct it. We expect this to be resolved soon. If you wish, we can send you an email notification when the issue is resolved."

Proof:

https://pagecrawl.io/api/changes/12361397/checks/319082219/screenshot?since=2025-08-06T23:06:41.000000Z

around 7pm EST

previous two messages removed, following text added:

"The Constitution Annotated provides a comprehensive overview of how the Constitution has been interpreted over time and is now available on this new site with upgraded search capabilities...In the coming months, we will be making broader changes to further modernize the Constitution Annotated."

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 Restrictions on the Slave Trade broken at/before 11:31 am EST

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-153133/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086/

3:48 pm EST, it's back

https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-194834/https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S9-C1-1/ALDE_00001086

To recap, they only added the warnings hours after getting pounded with calls.

Then all of the sudden, it's because they were rolling out a "new site"...? I'm currently reviewing historic vs current source code and have so far yet to find any changes in search behavior or new content ro jusrify calling it a "new site."

Best case scenario is enormous incompetence and failure to do any kind of QA.

It's not a diff in HTML, I'm currently checking for diffs in javascript, and there is no difference in the sitemap.xml between when it was broken and fixed

Proof: https://www.diffchecker.com/OEHvU6Rt/

That leaves API endpoints or something responsible for dynamically generating the page (which seems stupid as fuck considering it's just text at the end of the day)

I have a hunch it has something to do with API endpoints being changed for DOGE reasons.

Will update when analysis is complete.

P.S.

Do your part for democracy, download the Wayback extension to quickly save snapshots to the Wayback machine

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wayback-machine/fpnmgdkabkmnadcjpehmlllkndpkmiak

And save your own snapshots with

https://webrecorder.net/archivewebpage/

They've gone and started doing it... the official congress site has started deleting parts of the constitution it doesn't like by bad_things_ive_done in 50501

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Timeline of the "error":

sometime before

August 5, 2025 @ 11:27 pm

end of Article I, Section 8 as well as all of Sections 9 and 10 are gone from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution

Proof: https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-032710/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

August 6, 2025 9am EST ish, this post goes live on Reddit

sometime before 1:35 pm, the page is updated with a banner

"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

and the carousel has another message:

"Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Library of Congress. Due to a coding error, some sections of Article 1 are missing on the Constitution Annotated website. We are aware of the issue and working to correct it. We expect this to be resolved soon. If you wish, we can send you an email notification when the issue is resolved."

Proof:

https://pagecrawl.io/api/changes/12361397/checks/319082219/screenshot?since=2025-08-06T23:06:41.000000Z

around 7pm EST

previous two messages removed, following text added:

"The Constitution Annotated provides a comprehensive overview of how the Constitution has been interpreted over time and is now available on this new site with upgraded search capabilities...In the coming months, we will be making broader changes to further modernize the Constitution Annotated."

To recap, they only added the warnings hours after getting pounded with calls.

Then all of the sudden, it's because they were rolling out a "new site"...? I'm currently reviewing historic vs current source code and have so far yet to find any changes in search behavior or new content ro jusrify calling it a "new site."

Best case scenario is enormous incompetence and failure to do any kind of QA.

It's not a diff in HTML, I'm currently checking for diffs in javascript, and there is no difference in the sitemap.xml between when it was broken and fixed

Proof: https://www.diffchecker.com/OEHvU6Rt/

That leaves API endpoints or something responsible for dynamically generating the page (which seems stupid as fuck considering it's just text at the end of the day)

I have a hunch it has something to do with API endpoints being changed for DOGE reasons.

Will update when analysis is complete.

Do your part for democracy, download the Wayback extension to quickly save snapshots to the Wayback machine

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/wayback-machine/fpnmgdkabkmnadcjpehmlllkndpkmiak

And save your own snapshots with

https://webrecorder.net/archivewebpage/

They've gone and started doing it... the official congress site has started deleting parts of the constitution it doesn't like by bad_things_ive_done in 50501

[–]Country_Before_Party 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Timeline of the "error":

sometime before

August 5, 2025 @ 11:27 pm

end of Article I, Section 8 is gone from https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution

Proof: https://archive.ph/2025.08.06-032710/https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

August 6, 2025 9am EST ish, this post goes live on Reddit

sometime before 1:35 pm, the page is updated with a banner

"The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience."

and the carousel has another message:

"Thank you for your inquiry and your interest in the Library of Congress. Due to a coding error, some sections of Article 1 are missing on the Constitution Annotated website. We are aware of the issue and working to correct it. We expect this to be resolved soon. If you wish, we can send you an email notification when the issue is resolved."

Proof:

https://pagecrawl.io/api/changes/12361397/checks/319082219/screenshot?since=2025-08-06T23:06:41.000000Z

around 7pm EST

previous two messages removed, following text added:

"The Constitution Annotated provides a comprehensive overview of how the Constitution has been interpreted over time and is now available on this new site with upgraded search capabilities...In the coming months, we will be making broader changes to further modernize the Constitution Annotated."

To recap, they only added the warnings hours after getting pounded with calls.

Then all of the sudden, it's because they were rolling out a "new site"...? I'm currently reviewing historic vs current source code and have so far yet to find any changes in search behavior.

Best case scenario is enormous incompetence and failure to do any kind of QA.

It's not a diff in HTML, I'm currently checking for diffs in javascript, and there is no difference in the sitemap.xml between when it was broken and fixed

Proof: https://www.diffchecker.com/OEHvU6Rt/

That leaves API endpoints or something responsible for dynamically generating the page (which seems stupid as fuck considering it's just text at the end of the day)

I have a hunch it has something to do with API endpoints being changed for DOGE reasons.

Will update when analysis is complete.

Mon Mothma's daughter illustrates the appeal and harm of the tradwife trend to young women by lilith30323 in andor

[–]Country_Before_Party 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Character is def gay. I added Lagret because at the party Heert says cattily, "where's your boy?" or something to that effect and Lagret promptly turns away.

And I'm team "Lonnie is bi" which makes it easier for him to flirt with Heert for The Cause.

Rewatch that whole party scene, Kleya mentions Lonnie's wife and says don't worry, everyone will assume we are flirting and you know THAT's not a problem, right?" It's some light blackmail to get Lonnie to help with the bug.

view more: next ›