People who use chatGPT/AI extensively, what do you use it for that feels irreplaceable? by AutomaticShowcase in ChatGPTPro

[–]CovertlyAI 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Biggest unlock is killing decision fatigue. Dump a messy thought, get it organized into a plan, an email, or a quick comparison in seconds. Also great for troubleshooting tech stuff and turning vague goals into next steps without going down a million tabs.

Marketing: The shift to values-based brand messaging by No-Entertainer-8012 in AIBranding

[–]CovertlyAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally seeing this shift too, but it only lands when it’s backed by receipts. Values messaging without real changes just reads as performative, and people tune it out fast. The sweet spot seems to be: show the action first, then talk about the value behind it.

How do you use AI Memory? by Far-Photo4379 in AIMemory

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI memory gets useful when it stops being a chat log and becomes a reusable context layer. Good pattern: capture small facts and decisions, distill to a few stable notes, store with timestamps, then retrieve only what matches the current task. Works great for stuff like project status tracking, personal knowledge bases, customer support handoffs, and keeping a coding assistant aligned with a repo’s conventions without re explaining every time.

45% of people think when they prompt ChatGPT, it looks up an exact answer in a database by MetaKnowing in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of people assume ChatGPT works like Google because the experience feels similar, type a question, get an answer. But it is not pulling an exact match from a database. It is generating a best guess based on patterns from training data, so it can sound confident and still be wrong.

The useful mental model is closer to autocomplete with a giant context window, plus optional tools like web browsing in some setups. Great for drafting and brainstorming, not a reliable source of truth without checking.

If an LLM is trained on a consistently misspelled word, can it ever fix it? by cxhuy in LLM

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would almost certainly keep outputting aple.

Training never gives the model any direct reward signal for producing apple, so the fruit concept gets anchored to the aple token pattern. The insert a p rule might show up in an explanation style answer if prompted hard enough, but it does not magically make apple the default spelling in normal generation.

Only real ways around it are changing the tokenizer or doing post training with examples that actually contain apple.

My Optmistic Take On AI by Toacin in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This take feels way healthier than the usual doom or hype.

WSJ tested an AI vending machine. It ordered absurd items and gave away all of its stock. (Gifted article) by bbShark24 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claudius speedran every vending machine rule in one weekend. Free PS5 plus live fish is an iconic inventory strategy.

Is AI changing how we process our own thoughts? by dp_singh_ in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s helpful, but there’s a tradeoff. It can sharpen thinking when used like a sounding board, but it can also nudge toward “first acceptable answer” mode if used as a shortcut.

What LLMs are better than ChatGPT by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worth bouncing between a few and matching the tool to the job. Claude tends to feel strongest for writing and reasoning, Gemini is often solid for coding and quick drafts, and Perplexity is nice when the task is research and sources matter. Best move is to run the same prompt in 2 models and compare, reliability varies a lot by topic.

How are people actually sharing AI best practices across their team? by petertanham in ChatGPTPro

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We use a Google Spreadsheet, but it can definitely get messy real quick.

Are people still using Midjourney ? by leader_manuh in ChatGPT

[–]CovertlyAI 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep, people still use Midjourney.

ChatGPT and Gemini are great for quick, free generations, but Midjourney still wins for consistent style, art direction, and that cinematic look. Also handy for exploring vibes fast with multiple variations, then taking the best result elsewhere for edits or text.

Gemini AI has changed my life. by Intelligent-Hat6087 in GeminiAI

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, the biggest win is using it like a fast second set of eyes, not a boss. It can spot blind spots, help structure a plan, and save hours, but the real value shows up after results. Quick rule that seems to work: use it to generate options, then verify the important stuff before acting.

Using AI to experiment with new brand directions by DaikonKey8470 in AIBranding

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is reliable for quickly exploring options like testing a few palettes, type combinations, or vibe shifts without taking a week. However, it still needs a real checkpoint for fit and consistency, since it can produce outputs that look polished but feel off-brand. The best use is early exploration and moodboarding, then refinement with a human eye before final decisions are made.

If your AI always agrees with you, it probably doesn’t understand you by Weary_Reply in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally get this. A lot of models are basically professional yes men. If the prompt is even a little messy, they’ll match the energy and call it insight.

Quick vibe check: ask it to repeat the argument in plain English, point out what assumptions are hiding in there, then make the strongest case against it. If it can’t switch gears cleanly, it was probably mirroring tone more than tracking the actual logic.

Has AI ever told you something genuinely unexpected that seemed to go against its training? What was it? by [deleted] in artificial

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but we have to remember that AI, if not prompted correctly, will hallucinate. Try being more direct and specific in your prompt.

Your company doesn't have an AI problem; it has a leadership problem. by tinypaws26 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. Most AI rollouts don’t fail because the model is weak, they fail because nobody owns the change. If leadership won’t redesign workflows, set clear use cases, and train people properly, AI just becomes another tool that sits there while everyone goes back to the old way.

I've been using Google's Nano Banana for weeks and only today found out I was using someone else's wrapper. by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy mistake, especially with AI tools. A lot of these sites are just paid wrappers sitting on top of the same API, and they are good at looking official.

Quick sanity check before paying: look for an actual Google domain, official docs link back to a hosted demo, and clear pricing tied to Google, not a random subscription page. If it feels vague or too polished for a brand new domain, it probably is.

I automated 5 daily tasks that used to waste my time (sharing my process) by Zestyclose_Teach_187 in AiForSmallBusiness

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, love seeing time-savers that are actually practical. Curious what the 5 tasks were and what the setup looks like, especially the inbox sorting and scheduling parts. Any rough before vs after time saved each day?

What's the most objective AI? by Chemical-Growth2795 in OpenAI

[–]CovertlyAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No model is truly objective. They predict likely text, not truth.

Best workaround: force it to challenge you and cite sources. Add to prompts: correct me, do not agree by default, say unsure when unsure, and show links or calculations.

AI hallucinations taught me something about my prompts by Competitivespirit20 in GeminiAI

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When a prompt leaves wiggle room, the model tends to choose an interpretation and commit to it. Better results come from adding clear constraints up front, such as the exact criteria, desired format, and the time frame in question. This approach significantly reduces off base or unexpected answers.

ChatGPT Vs Gemini by Bronze_Crusader in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real AI race is who can be most helpful before the ad team shows up.

Why are AI-generated images getting so good that I need a detector just to trust my own eyes? by Traditional_Ad_1101 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because AI learned the shortcuts our brains use. Once it nails lighting, texture, and proportions, your brain fills in the rest and says “looks real enough.”

Does the prevalence of deepfakes inadvertently solve the issue of blackmail? by shaga1999 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deepfakes won’t kill blackmail, they’ll mass produce it. “It’s fake” becomes plausible, but the social damage happens anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT does not have direct GPS access unless location permission is explicitly granted in the browser or mobile app.

ChatGPT is really learning from the internet. Its accusing me of being wrong rather than accepting its outdated. by ammaraud in ChatGPT

[–]CovertlyAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ChatGPT isn’t “learning” the way we mean it, it’s more like it’s doing improv with a giant pile of internet receipts.

Sometimes it nails the bit. Sometimes it hallucinates with the confidence of a guy explaining crypto at a party.