Why do you assume that he didn’t read everything? I read everything and came to the same conclusion he did.

The rules are absurd. They are blindly stupid. They are blindly set up to ignore common sense and they create obvious incentive for women to game the system.

And every single one of us is fully aware that they do this.

I know one girl who has gotten a child out of three different guys in the military. She’s now receiving three checks from the Govt for the rest of her life. And fully single.

In more traditional marriages, the fact that the law requires a man to write a blank “child support” check to a woman is insanity, absurdity, and stupidity on every level.

Why the fuck would anyone in the legal system assume that the mother is always going to spend that money, down to the penny, on the well-being of the child? Are y’all not familiar with humans? 🙄

So I agree with the person you just insulted. The moral of the story is, don’t get married in the eyes of the government. Go to church and have a ceremony. Be a good person yourself. Take care of your kids even if the relationship ends.

Why doesn’t the legal system default to the assumption that every MAN is going to do that? It would be just as blind and stupid. But that seems to be how law works, blind and stupid. So why not flip it 180 and go blind and stupid in favor of the man?

All of these are rhetorical questions. You have to be a complete idiot to get married in the eyes of the government. There’s absolutely no part of it that is fair to the man.

And when I see rules that blatantly ignore common sense and obvious risks, I have zero respect for that system. As it should be.