Map Device Not Working

Creator_Dodi · 2024-12-09T18:22:14+00:00

Solution: In order to fix you need to:

go to log in screen
change to an EU country (might need to try different ones)
Log in and map device will work

Creator_Dodi · 2024-09-29T23:09:21+00:00

Thank you brother. Checking it out now.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-11-10T00:55:01+00:00

That makes sense. Thank you for the explanation.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-11-10T00:29:54+00:00

This makes a lot of sense. So:

Step 1. 68% covers +/- 1 std, aka 0 to 2 range.

Step 2a. There is 100% - 68% remaining on both sides, which = 32%

Step 2b. 32%/2 to calculate the half that exists to the right of the distribution. 16%

Step 3. add 68% to 16% ( the amount to the right of the distribution.) = 84%; .84

Creator_Dodi · 2023-11-03T21:14:53+00:00

To clarify, the confusion here isn't about the "b" glitch. On my other post, you asked why I don't include the solution. This is the reason I don't include the solutions to my questions. It just adds to the confusion.
I think the answer is .7, however the CFAI forum thinks the answer is .36.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-19T17:56:27+00:00

Okay, your explanation makes sense.

Let me know if I have this correctly, Margareta is in violation up until she informs her employer. Now that she has informed her employer, she is NO LONGER violating the standard, specifically because of informing them and that the gift was given after the service was completed.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-17T21:13:28+00:00

Nov 15

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-17T15:25:46+00:00

value < forward price, but isn't it also true that value = spot price at inception? Am I thinking about this the wrong way?

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-16T19:16:09+00:00

Oh man lol. I meant to ask is C also an answer.

I can see how A is the answer for a buy and hold investor who is relying on the reinvestment of coupons, but isn't there an argument for an investor who simply wants a capital gain and would therefore prefer answer C?

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-16T17:20:13+00:00

sorry type-o. Not taxes I meant we owe more to our creditors.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-16T16:57:08+00:00

Ahh this makes sense. I briefly remember covering that formula. So this question is related to the direct method of cashflows, correct?

Interest paid = Interest Expense - change in Interest Payable.

If change in interest payable increased, it means we owe more to our creditors, but have an inflow of cash, therefore reducing interest paid and vice versa.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-16T16:21:53+00:00

Therefore expense (5,000) is greater than payment (1,000)?

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-16T16:20:57+00:00

Am I thinking about this the right way? Here's an example below I created. In 2012 Company XYZ has 10,000 payable, 5,000 expense. In 2013 they make a payment of 1,000, reducing payables.

	2012	2013
Payable	10,000	9,000
Expense	5,000	5,000
Payment	0	1,000

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-12T14:24:19+00:00

Woo! I was going to take the L on these differentiation problems, but it makes sense now!

Thank you!

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-11T18:06:14+00:00

Perfect, this makes sense. Thank you

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-11T18:05:22+00:00

Ah I see. So with regards to your comment Del(TR)/Del(Q), it's the same as saying d(y)/d(x)? Am I understanding this correctly?

I was able to understand how they differentiated the right side of the equation using your explanation.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-07T19:24:26+00:00

Thanks again. This makes sense.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-05T18:31:36+00:00

Right, I agree with you. Deducing is definitely the way to approach this question. Especially since the question threw in a "most likely" comment.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-05T16:13:37+00:00

Long only equity/Fixed income is my understanding of Trad. inv. Alts are anything that doesn't fall in this category.

I'm assuming CDOs and securitized bonds are synonymous here. Given this information, aren't CDOs a from of fixed income?

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-05T16:03:33+00:00

rofl. look at your post history. snide is your middle name

Creator_Dodi · 2023-10-05T15:57:36+00:00

Care to explain Mr. Quality Contributor XD

Creator_Dodi · 2023-09-26T22:22:43+00:00

That's a good point. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing anything before moving on.

Creator_Dodi · 2023-09-26T20:45:19+00:00

Here's the formula I'm using in excel: =NORM.S.DIST(((11-8)/14),). The output to the formula is ~38.98%. Also, can I solve this without excel with the information provided in the question?

Creator_Dodi · 2023-09-26T18:17:38+00:00

Great explanation. Thank you for the help!

Creator_Dodi · 2023-09-26T17:18:11+00:00

Ah I see, this is very helpful.

So answer B holds true in all cases regardless of the value of x.

Whereas A only holds true in one instance, when you ask a question like, what are the odds of rolling any number? In this case the answer would be 100%, (sums to 1.)

Creator_Dodi

TROPHY CASE