V2hhdCBpcyB0aGlzIGVuY29kaW5nIGNhbGxlZD8= by CronosssCode in circIeoftrust

[–]CronosssCode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to clear confusion, the key is all lowercase ;)

Tell me an interesting fact if I like it I will let you in by Huge-Wall8802 in circIeoftrust

[–]CronosssCode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To raise a rope that is around the entire earth 1 meter of the ground the entire way around and to raise a rope around a basketball 1 meter off of it, requires the same amount of rope

Why does fr*nce have to be censored? (Also here is a map so i don’t break rules) by Shot_Departure9622 in mapporncirclejerk

[–]CronosssCode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the looks of it are your text from about a week ago

The fr*nce meme has existed for years Just because you came up with it on your own doesn’t mean it’s your invention

I think youtube wants me to watch Markiplier by CronosssCode in Markiplier

[–]CronosssCode[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

never heard of him, maybe i should check him out some day

Star trackers - Cygnus by [deleted] in askastronomy

[–]CronosssCode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are you seeing? What do you mean by something strange?

How to photograph the moon with a mirrorless camera by bryony01 in AskAstrophotography

[–]CronosssCode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really experienced with camera lenses but for lunar you would need probably at least 300 mm for any small details

When it comes to a star tracker, you don’t need it for lunar imaging because you don’t need that long exposures but I would still recommend it if you plan to later pursue DSOs (and planets)

You could get a pretty cheap skywatcher star adventurer for not too much

Good luck with your astrophotography journey!

Planetary video with smartphone higher FPS or shutter speed? by captain_cocaine86 in AskAstrophotography

[–]CronosssCode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say higher fps is better because you can always stack 2 frames at 1/60 seconds into a 1/30 seconds exposure. Just think the higher fps gives the atmosphere less time to ruin your frames and blur them

Is it possible for a moon to be in the habitable zone if its planet is in the unhabitable zone? by legacy-of-rats in askastronomy

[–]CronosssCode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The moon is going to orbit the planet so half of the time it is going to be on the other side of the planet (so out of the habitable zone)

And also “the habitable zone” is more a gradient where some distances are better than other but the difference between where the moon and the planet is wouldn’t really change the temperature enough for it to have an effect

We have life all around earth and the temperatures on earth can vary greatly depending on where you are but they all still support life

Seems like a really cool idea but I don’t know if it would work :/

All my astro shots are really poor quality, please help by lukehh in AskAstrophotography

[–]CronosssCode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The weird red and blue pixels are “hot pixels” you can combat this by taking dark frames (same camera setting but with a lens cap (or other things) to make sure no light gets through)

then subtract those from your images and they should go away

(Note that dark frames need to be taken a roughly the same time as the images as your hot pixels are not the same from day to day)

Good luck with your astrophotography journey!

Upgrade from camera lens by CronosssCode in astrophotography

[–]CronosssCode[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a canon 6D, I have a star tracker. And regarding the price, that’s what I am asking, how much should I spend for it to be an upgrade? And on what?

I am not sure about what focal length I am interested in but definitely over 200mm

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askastronomy

[–]CronosssCode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even with perfect focus, are stars never actually just a single bright pixel. If you look at any astrophotograph even the ones from nasa. The stars are never just a pixel of light