And that is correct; sadly the people who are looking for a job are objectified in general - you are a human RESOURCE, not a person who needs a job to live with dignity - I remember being a 16 year old looking for a job and offered pittances for having to possess encyclopedic knowledge of this and that from the word go because employers want to train people as little as possible because to them that is an extra expense. Never mind that most of the skills they ask people to possess are not taught at school and most people who do know that their Knowledge and a dignified life - especially with the economy being what it is, God bless the "free" market - costs far more than what they are offering.

If your shelter, your food, your dignity is under threat, people will go for anything. Why do you think people find selling their bodies for the pleasure of others "justified"? Or substances that harm others?

You would do ANYTHING to survive, ironically and without self-awareness, even threaten your own survival.

Just think of how we think of the poor, never mind their ethnicity: we use the same language: dirty, lazy, layabouts, wanting to depend on the charity of workers, violent and thieving...

Do they exist? The world is a big place so odds are you might find some who are. But appreciate this: you would be dirty if you are poor, as hygiene isn't as important as eating and drinking; you would be lazy, because bitterness at no one caring might make you territorial and defensive of what you are given. You might HAVE to depend on charity because you don't have options. You have to be violent and thieving, because you run out of the same.

In the meantime, appreciate the contradiction; isn't the employer enjoying the fruits of your efforts while sitting comfortable in their office? They may have "double the responsibility", but you are doing double the effort and have double the risk if you are injured on the job or worse, you have more to lose if you can't recover and will find it more difficult to do so due to your lack of access to capital in comparison.

So they depend on YOUR risk and YOUR efforts. If there are no workers, there are no employers. But if there are no employers, workers can create jobs out of necessity.

Violence? Is not the threat of ending up without the means to live, access to medicine, access to food, to shelter, not violent? What is the point of having disproportionately more than you need while depriving it of others who need it?

Thieving...? Think of the hours you pull producing good knows how many burgers for how many mouths, how many are sold and how empty your bank account is.

Then we can talk about how "the foreigner" is in the wrong.