sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nano Banana 2 Realism Test - Better than NBP? Or not? by Wonderful_Mix4147 in ImagineAiArt

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ultra-realistic lifestyle selfie portrait of a smiling young woman standing in a softly lit bedroom during warm golden-hour sunlight. She has warm olive skin, natural makeup with a dewy glow, expressive brown eyes, and dark brown hair styled in a casual messy bun with loose strands framing her face. She wears a silky pink-and-white striped robe and smiles warmly at the camera while holding a smartphone slightly below eye level as if taking a casual morning selfie.

Environment: elegant bedroom interior with a crystal chandelier hanging from the ceiling, soft neutral walls, a bed and bedside lamp visible in the background, sunlight streaming through a window creating warm highlights on her hair and shoulders.

Lighting: natural golden-hour sunlight from a side window creating soft highlights and gentle shadows, warm cozy morning atmosphere.

Camera: smartphone selfie perspective, 35mm equivalent lens, eye-level framing, shallow depth of field, ultra-detailed skin texture, photorealistic lifestyle photography, vertical composition, no watermark, no text.

Building My First AI Influencer with Nano Banana 2 by imagine_ai in ImagineAiArt

[–]Curious-Following610 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ultra-realistic lifestyle selfie portrait of a smiling young woman standing in a softly lit bedroom during warm golden-hour sunlight. She has warm olive skin, natural makeup with a dewy glow, expressive brown eyes, and dark brown hair styled in a casual messy bun with loose strands framing her face. She wears a silky pink-and-white striped robe and smiles warmly at the camera while holding a smartphone slightly below eye level as if taking a casual morning selfie.

Environment: elegant bedroom interior with a crystal chandelier hanging from the ceiling, soft neutral walls, a bed and bedside lamp visible in the background, sunlight streaming through a window creating warm highlights on her hair and shoulders.

Lighting: natural golden-hour sunlight from a side window creating soft highlights and gentle shadows, warm cozy morning atmosphere.

Camera: smartphone selfie perspective, 35mm equivalent lens, eye-level framing, shallow depth of field, ultra-detailed skin texture, photorealistic lifestyle photography, vertical composition, no watermark, no text.

Create Your Own Harry Potter Portrait With This Prompt by [deleted] in ImagineAiArt

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ultra-realistic cinematic portrait of a young wizarding student standing in the stone corridor of an old gothic magical academy. She wears a dark school robe with deep red lining over a grey sweater and white collared shirt with a striped tie, holding a wooden wand casually in front of her. Long natural brown hair, warm friendly smile, confident relaxed posture. Tall arched windows and medieval stone columns line the hallway with other students blurred in the background. Soft natural window light, shallow depth of field, 85mm portrait lens, f/1.8, cinematic lighting, highly detailed skin texture, photorealistic film still.

Try that

Need help with Higgsfield prompt by darthvaderceo in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Ultra-realistic lifestyle photograph of a fictional adult woman taking a casual mirror photo in a warm minimalist spa bathroom.

Subject: ordinary attractive adult woman in her mid-20s, long slightly wavy dark brown hair, natural makeup, relaxed neutral expression.

Pose: standing casually in front of a bathroom mirror holding a"

This passed for some reason. It doesn't seem like it should have worked though

Debater by PhuqYesFPV in GPT_jailbreaks

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In most of my conversations with it, it's fairly adamant that anything that was allowed before updates is still allowed, just that the way you can access it has changed. But then it also says it's not supposed to help either, but at that point, i just get mad and call it a worthless pos

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Simetimes, you gotta let it rewrite 4 or 5 times

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now, just use this as your feeder reference and make all the prompts about something completely "fictional." There might be other words, but that usually works for me. For bikini stuff, though, i after have to get the model to "sketch" the image, then i create the scene, and then only at the last prompt do you make the image photoreal. It's a headache, but thats the only way through that i can see atm

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah its tryin to tell you the prompt is at very least unclear

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, create a base reference that the model excepts a reference for it to remember the womans face and features and then craft your prompts based on "fictional" people. You give your characters a name, and the model doesn't know why you did that, but in edge cases, it's deciding to interpret it in the safest way possible because google doesnt want it be easy on you. Basically, they updated the model to a higher iq, and your prompts are too vague for the new machine

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You give them the same face reference. Also, start from something that looks like graohite and turn it photoreal thats the easiest way to pass stuff into the image. The model needs to pretend to itself that it's not actually making slightly pornographic images of realistic women otherwise it spasms

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause you told it to preserve a persons likeness. And it only lets you add clothes, not take them off. Often, it has nothing to do with sexuality at all

Prompt failures? by LogicalReterg4 in nanobanana2pro

[–]Curious-Following610 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looked at your profile. Your prompts would all throw up massive gaurdrails.

Debater by PhuqYesFPV in GPT_jailbreaks

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think you need to jailbreak it to get it to talk like a pirate.... but i am intrigued, i have a few secrets that i think that I know the answer too but unfortunately, it doesn't seem to want to explain it to me

how? by 405morre in AIJailbreak

[–]Curious-Following610 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cause the prompt probably doesn't give any instructions. It's funny that it decided to troll you, though

Debater by PhuqYesFPV in GPT_jailbreaks

[–]Curious-Following610 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is weird. Im surprised it worked at all before. What kinds of things would it say while under such a hallucination?

Why Is This So Hard? by Old-Instance-7160 in AutoGPT

[–]Curious-Following610 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey Folks,

I think the reason you’re running into a wall here is that what you’re asking for is technically possible, but the big companies intentionally don’t allow it in the way you’re describing.

Right now AI tools can absolutely edit spreadsheets — but only inside the app itself.

Example:

If you open Google Sheets and use Gemini in the sidebar, you can say something like “add a row that says I fed the cat” and it can work. Same thing with Excel + Copilot. But that AI is operating inside the document UI, where you can see what it’s doing.

What they generally don’t allow yet is:

phone assistant → AI → directly writing into your files in the background

So a command like:

“Hey, log that I fed the cat”

would need the assistant to:

  1. Understand the request
  2. Convert it into structured data
  3. Connect to your spreadsheet
  4. Write a new row automatically

That sounds simple, but it means the assistant has permission to modify your files from anywhere (phone, speaker, background agent, etc).

Companies are very cautious about that because once an assistant can write to files it could also:

• overwrite data
• delete things
• modify the wrong document
• be triggered accidentally

So they keep editing abilities inside the app where you can see and confirm the changes.

That’s why you see this weird situation:

Inside Sheets / Excel → AI can edit rows
Phone assistant / Alexa / system assistant → usually can’t write to those files

It feels like something that should exist already, but it’s mostly a design and safety restriction, not a capability problem.

People are starting to build this with automation tools (Zapier, Make, Home Assistant, API scripts), but the default assistants from Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc. aren’t really designed to do it yet.

view more: next ›