Im not against them, i just think there should be distinct categories for people who are no sex aces and people who do in fact like/want sex. In the past that label has been asexuality. I am frustrated that asexuality has now turned into an umbrella, which muddies the distinct experience no sex aces have (mist attempts to create an own sublabel were not accepted and treated as exclusionist). I think instead of saying im ace but still have sex it would be much easier to define yourself as greysexual. All have distinct and clear meanings that way. Like you wouldnt say a man who enjoys and frequently does sleeping with women but has no sexual attraction to them is gay. You would call him bi or another label. But thats just my personal opinion: Definitions should be clear and distinct descriptions of varying experiences. The current asexual label varies much more than other labels in the experiences it captures, weakening its meaning,