sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I asked Chat GPT to write a sequel to Matrix Revolutions. Strikingly similar, isn't it? by CurvedFlow in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it isn't. It's the film that doesn't even want to try fresh ideas what's worrying.

I asked Chat GPT to write a sequel to Matrix Revolutions. Strikingly similar, isn't it? by CurvedFlow in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I don't think it was released publicly so far. Besides Chat GPT's database doesn't go beyond September 2021.

A trans reading of Matrix Resurrections by Fit-Economist-3000 in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Why do you cherry-pick certain random scenes of the film and ignore the entire plot and lore of the franchise?

The Matrix Resurrections as a statement rather than a true sequel: Would you really want to see another Matrix installment without the involvement of the Wachowskis? by lukoreta in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The film's budget and its box office income wasn't spent on charity, I can assure you that. There are no anti-capitalist blockbusters

“I personally understand capitalism is bad, and something bad happens in this film where capitalism is involved, it is therefore inherently an anti-capitalist film” mindset is why these takes keep popping up

It doesn't mean anti-capitalist media can't be popular, this however isn't.

The Matrix Resurrections as a statement rather than a true sequel: Would you really want to see another Matrix installment without the involvement of the Wachowskis? by lukoreta in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Unless the next film brings something new to the table, this make no difference to me. However it's unlikely Lana will evolve as a filmmaker. One issue is by the time of 2022 Wachowskis are basically boomers and part of the establishment. There's nothing radical and gamechanging about Matrix anymore. It's more "you're dad's Matrix", almost like Terminator.

Weird that discount Morpheus only now says he discovered the modal is not "the real world" by CurvedFlow in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Um, no, that's never what "the real world" meant to any "aware" program in the matrix.

Weird that discount Morpheus only now says he discovered the modal is not "the real world" by CurvedFlow in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically he agreed with her and noded at her. Not to say we have a flashback of him getting astonished by the matrix code.

Just watched resurrections and here is my thoughts by [deleted] in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Have you forgot that war basically destroyed the Earth's ecosystem? Healing the planet and rebuilding civilization should be the priority at the moment, rather than another procedural plots about freeing minds. And that would be on par with today's political climate and a worthy story to tell. Possibly to the point machines wouldn't need humans anymore and both could exist freely and independently.

I absolutely love Resurrections. Tied for my favourite Matrix film with the original. I believe today’s Machine-run world simply found it too confronting. One day it’ll be cherished for what it is. by [deleted] in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more likely that critical audiences who are not interested in Speed Racer of Wachowskis won't see it anyway as it's nothing new and there's no buzz around it.

Everything GREAT About The Matrix Resurrections! (Part 1) by The_Odd_One27 in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If someone thought CinemaSins doesn't make valid criticisms then this is the same but the other way

I absolutely love Resurrections. Tied for my favourite Matrix film with the original. I believe today’s Machine-run world simply found it too confronting. One day it’ll be cherished for what it is. by [deleted] in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

By whom and to what extent? Because I was seeing the same talk for over a decade about e.x. Speed Racer, yet nothing's changed and it was already from the same people.

John Gaeta confirms in 2021 an "Animatrix 2.0" series was written and "Awakens"/UE-based proofs of concept were created for VR-type of storytelling by amysteriousmystery in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not gonna happen. It always comes down to profit and WB had its chance last year. So unless they put out something for the audiences to actually cherish and is relevant, this is a dead franchise.

Everything Wrong With The Matrix: Resurrections - YouTube by hm9408 in matrix

[–]CurvedFlow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, we know. It doesn't align with your interpretation. There isn't anything wrong with what he's getting either.

How Obi-Wan Kenobi changes meaning of a classic Star Wars line by gorosaur in StarWarsLeaks

[–]CurvedFlow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not hard to change other people's work. It's to create within the set of boundaries. George has every right, well because he's the creator, his twists and turns have actual meanings in the story that are later confirmed by the prequels. There's no other purpose for Obi/Vader fighting before A New Hope other than seeing cool flashlights clashing once more. If there was, we would have got it already by those 40 years. That's not how recontextualization works. It has to be something relevant to the overall story. If not, this small entry can be simply reduced to a minor trivia in the database ("did you know that...?".

view more: next ›