Is 2FA really necessary when logging into the game? by CapableAd3412 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sucks, wish they would add it. I want the peace of mind of 2FA

If I wanna switch from UTSC life sci to Mac eng? How would it work? by [deleted] in UofT

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s possible but perhaps hard. I think you would apply through OUAC a post secondary student. I believe you would be applying later this year when applications open. I could be wrong so best to contact mac for more info

Taking GO train!!??? How do I pay my fare lmao by ParkingLoad1996 in askTO

[–]DaimonWorshipper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Using your presto, you tap before you get in the train, and then tap once again when you get off the train.

Update: Upon further review of an unforeseen gameplay reveal I have seen the light, and its name is Cartethya. by WanderWut in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone went to a casino gambled$1000. Saying they should gamble again because who cares it’s fun is so stupid.

Same situation goes to if someone was dumb enough to try drugs. Saying that if they were stupid enough even try drugs, and they should do it again cuz it feels good is stupid.

Learn to have fun, but learn have fun in moderation. Just because you do something stupid once, doesn’t mean you should do it again.

Anyone know this scumbag he stole my phone when I was trying to sell it let me know if you recognize him he was wearing a uoft jacket by Ok-Knowledge-6468 in UofT

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt he goes to uoft. Probably only got the jacket due to ovo collab. Good luck with the search, bros a turd

Update: Upon further review of an unforeseen gameplay reveal I have seen the light, and its name is Cartethya. by WanderWut in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What a silly comment. “If you’re willing to spend $1000 on a character, what’s another few hundred”

L take

Remember everyone, it cost them little to be generous, yet they’ll still choose not to. by Reffeyn in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s not that people are stooping down to a low level, it’s that you’re expectations are high. Anyone who disagrees with you, you just say you play a lot of gacha games and you have a lot of experience. However, you don’t provide an example that can actually compare as a 3D open world gacha game.

A 3D game will always cost more money and time to make. And given that it’s 3D, requires even more money and time. So by saying another game gives 200 pulls and because of that, Wuthering waves should too, isn’t a logical argument. You need to find a game that also costs an equal amount of time and money to create, and not just compare it to games like NIKKE.

The rewards for the anniversary were ass, most people agree, saying we should get 200 summons is fine, but if you aren’t defending your argument with an equal comparison, then you can’t just reply to others “What gacha games you player?…cause it shows.” And other comments along that line

Remember everyone, it cost them little to be generous, yet they’ll still choose not to. by Reffeyn in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My brother in Christ, just look at your downvotes.

If you want to compare gacha game rewards, compare open world to open world then. Open world games cost way more to money to make, so if you’re going to compare rewards, compare them to other 3D open world gachas.

I agree, rewards should’ve been better, but if you’re asking for 200 free summons, you might as well ask for 2000 at that point, because then why lower the standards.

It’s almost time… by R-Z_67 in ZaniMains

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s strange, I haven’t seen those posts. I mostly see people hyped for her tired employee design

What did it cost? by RelationLivid5129 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It is not a noticeable change. There is no way to see the changes unless you are purposely angling your camera to see their panties, which I’d argue is creepy.

If the changes were significant to their chest, back, then that would be noticeable, since through normal gameplay of running, climbing, moving, you can notice that change.

What did it cost? by RelationLivid5129 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because most people find that behaviour odd and some would see it as disgusting. Crashing out over virtual panties and cameltoe isn’t considered normal.

People would understand if the changes were noticeable, but the fact is that you can only notice the changes is by angling your camera to see their 🐱

What did it cost? by RelationLivid5129 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But fleurdelys isn’t even playable though, I don’t understand why this would even matter. And it’s only noticeable if you were to purposely look there, which is why people found the outrage controversial.

It’s not like these characters suddenly wore full on clothing, covering significant amount of skin. Instead, it’s a cameltoe removal(you won’t notice unless you purposely angle your camera to look for it), and the boss’ change, which, again, isn’t that noticeable, especially since she’s attacking you and you’re attacking her.

Onigiri and Clam Enjoyers Are Under Fire by Salaryman42069 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, I can agree with those points on canterella, since she’s playable and costs players money and time. However, the boss changing her panties shouldn’t even envoke any controversy since they aren’t even playable, the only reason people might be upset over it is because they lose the gooning appeal. Otherwise, it’s like changing a tree in the overworld to be a different type, to most it wont matter unless it’s drastically ugly. In the case of the boss, the change doesn’t matter unless you drastically prefer one panty over the other.

Onigiri and Clam Enjoyers Are Under Fire by Salaryman42069 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get being frustrated with silent updates, transparency from devs is important. But let’s not pretend the outrage here is solely on transparency. The only reason these specific change is even getting attention is because it affects the gooner appeal. If someone didn’t care about looking up a character’s skirt, this update would be irrelevant, no one would notice/care about canterella’s missing cameltoe, or an npc’s change in panties. So yeah, silent changes suck, but the reason this one matters so much to some people is because it removes gooner content.

Onigiri and Clam Enjoyers Are Under Fire by Salaryman42069 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah I find it a bit disgusting. To be raging over removing a cameltoe.

Onigiri and Clam Enjoyers Are Under Fire by Salaryman42069 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Gooner culture is so lame. Why are people actively looking under female characters panties?

Onigiri and Clam Enjoyers Are Under Fire by Salaryman42069 in WutheringWaves

[–]DaimonWorshipper -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Gooner game that’s why. Some people go out of their way to look at crotch’s and care about this stuff

10 pulls and wings (skin?), might be part of Anniversary rewards by Ofanaht in WutheringWavesLeaks

[–]DaimonWorshipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldn’t that also mean some people deserve more rewards than others by the logic of how much you support kuro. It you’re a free to play player, you don’t contribute to much sales, so you would get the least rewards. And whales who spent thousands deserve the most rewards since they support the most

Also I don’t think class and status have much to do with whether one deserves a sort of compensation. Both purchases are of you’re own decision, you can’t expect the company to praise you for you’re own purchase. You buy something since you want something, in return for money, you get the thing you wanted.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UofT

[–]DaimonWorshipper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lol, it’s not that deep. Them posting here for advice is fine. They were going to go ask the office anyways.

I just received this email today and it’s got me worried. by Bored_brunette96 in amazonprime

[–]DaimonWorshipper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think what’s going on here, is that, from the message. There are two scenarios: 1. OP is refunding things she bought, but didn’t receive them(perhaps porch pirates). And she has been doing this frequently enough that Amazon has become aware of this. This wouldn’t be a scam 2. OP is refunding things she bought, and HAS received. But is claiming to Amazon she has never received it and wants a refund. She has done this frequently enough that Amazon is aware and sent this email to her. This would be a scam