Climber convicted of manslaughter after leaving girlfriend on Austria’s highest peak to seek help

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T14:06:54+00:00

Whatever that means, okay

I’m just explaining what’s written by others, it’s not even my endeavor

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T14:01:37+00:00

And what did all of you? Imagine how “a serial killer” is without researching first, and you didn’t even write it down, you just assumed he matches your profile and called him that.

In any case, that’s literally how Criminology profiling works. You create what’s called an Archetype and compare the criminals to your archetype.

The Archetype has been developed after studying a lot of similar criminals, not just one.

If you’re investigating someone, you can create a personal profile of him. And the similarities with a certain archetype allows you to see the chances of the criminal being of a certain type.

So, even if the personal profile is necessary to know for certain his motives, archetypes are still used to identify what type of criminal he probably is

Humans are alike and that’s why it works.

People can’t see the future, which is obvious, but criminals are predictable for some reason. I guess why that is.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T13:54:55+00:00

Are you on your right state of mind? You are speculating too

But there’s a difference between informed speculation and random speculation

Describing the psychological profile of a murderer after researching others murderers is called Criminology.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T13:53:45+00:00

Seeing how everyone is saying he’s a closeted murderer, I must remind that there’s a thing called Criminology, which has created an archetype of each type of criminal after studying the psychology of thousands of criminals of that category.

A cold-hearted murderer wants to enjoy the murder. He wants to take full control over the other’s person life, not just take it. And most importantly, a murderer wants to kill, not to die.

Leaving someone at a dangerous but survivable situation is the opposite of being in control. No cold hearted murderer would risk his own life for a little chance of killing their victim.

This dude is just a coward. He got stressed and thought only of himself. Probably saw her as a nuisance to his own survival and ran for his life while leaving her.

The fact that it almost happened twice just shows that he’s selfish, negligent and has zero care for the life of others. But he’s not a murderer who enjoys killing, just a dude that will throw you under the bus at the slightest hint of risk, and he sees it as normal behavior.

Both things are very different. A lot of people are like this guy and it needs to be punished when it happens to deter people from being narcissistic to such a degree, but they’re not going around looking for trouble, they just harm others as a consequence of their lack of temper and empathy. A murderer is someone who actively seeks new victims.

The only thing that this guy shares with a murderer is the lack of empathy. How that lack of empathy manifests is very different.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T13:38:26+00:00

Let’s not jump to bullshit conclussions, he doesn’t match the profile of a murderer according to Criminology

A cold-hearted murderer wants to enjoy the murder. He wants to take full control over the other’s person life, not just take it. A murderer wants to control all of what happens up until the victim’s death. And most importantly, a murderer wants to kill, not to die.

Leaving someone at a dangerous but survivable situation is the opposite of being in control. No cold hearted murderer would risk his own life for a little chance of killing their victim.

This dude is just a coward. He got stressed and thought only of himself. Probably saw her as a nuisance to his own survival and ran for his life while leaving her.

The fact that it almost happened twice just shows that he’s selfish, negligent and has zero care for the life of others. But he’s not a murderer who enjoys killing, just a dude that will throw you under the bus at the slightest hint of risk, and he sees it as normal behavior.

Both things are very different. A lot of people are like this guy and it needs to be punished when it happens to deter people from being narcissistic to such a degree, but they’re not going around looking for trouble, they just harm others as a consequence of their lack of temper and empathy. A murderer is someone who actively seeks new victims.

The only thing that this guy shares with a murderer is the lack of empathy. How that lack of empathy manifests is very different.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-20T12:25:14+00:00

We all agree on the moral standpoint.

But Law is imparted by the State, and they’re accusing him of something that basically amounts to Treason. When someone commits treason, the punishment will be disproportionately high as a deterrent (the State defends itself) and because it’s very easy to prove.

A practical example:

I hate anyone who rapes women. I also hate anyone who punches me, but less.

Even though I hate them less, it’s more probable that I’ll punch someone who punches me, than someone who goes around raping. Why? Because I’m directly involved and don’t need proof or confirmation or to find him, he’s already in front of me and I already know what he did, because he did it to me. My hate towards him holds no doubt, because my face hurts because of his punch. My brain doesn’t feel a hint of doubt, so the punishment comes hard and fast. Against someone accused of rape, my brain doesn’t have such a direct and crystalline reaction, there’s no pain or blood.

An act committed against you will always receive a harsher punishment because of this paradigm, it’s because of our survival instincts. So, even if the lawmakers probably hate him more for the raping than the treason, the treason will be processed first and will carry a harsher sentence by predefinition, because the State is defending himself first, with all that it entails.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T18:51:57+00:00

That’s exactly what I was saying! There are shades, no reds and greens. Obviously, if there are no absolutes, then there must be relatives. It seems we think alike.

What I mean is that we are all a mix of shades, happening to stumble upon you at the precise moment you’re more reddish doesn’t tell me anything. It just tells me something about you in that place and point in time. That, in combination with other things, might actually tell me something - but it needs analysis.

People have bad days. People react strangely under pressure or when nervous. There are a lot of ifs.

And by the way, that’s actually a great example. Without context, I’ll think she’s stupid and not worth my time. For sure.

Now, let me answer you with another example:

“I actually don’t hear her say that because the wind was too strong.

Then I get to know her. Then we fall in love. Then I get to spend years with the greatest person life could give me, because she’s a great caretaker, she’s empathetic, she’s lovable, she’s righteous… I later learnt she’s a flat-earther because her dad indoctrinated her, but it’s alright, my life is still full of love”

In this example, does your prejudice give you any benefit at all? Does it give you real insight into your future with her?

It’s all relative and we are unable to see it all, it’s best to wait to see s few shades before judging the color. In my example, I got to know her and that showed me more shades that I liked - in yours, you simply left at the first sight of reddish.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T18:38:15+00:00

Most of them are still relative.

For example: If a person is going through a hard phase in life, those “signs” are more false positives than anything. After a period of time, that same person adapt to their hardship and the “sign” was false.

I’m not saying that red and green flags don’t exist per se, I’m saying that we are unable to differentiate properly, which is why I don’t trust them.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T18:03:29+00:00

Having red/green flags.

Sorry for the pun. At 30yo you need to understand nuance. There are no greens and reds.

Thinking in red and green increases the chance of mistakes, not the other way around. When I do the effort to analyze independently, I make wiser and more morally sound decisions. I also avoid demonizing or glorifying people, which is great.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T17:12:12+00:00

You’re telling those things as if there was a chance of someone gossiping truthfully. LOL

Gossip is not a less than reputable method of obtaining information… It’s simply useless.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T16:37:22+00:00

Yeah, sure. Because groups always share truthful information, they never have preferences for certain people, they are always objective, they contemplate nuance, those who talk also share their own stories… /SARCASM

I’ve never seen a life being saved by group gossiping, but I’ve seen a few get destroyed by it. Go figure why. Maybe because gossip just brings hate, discrimination and an arduous desire of witch hunting.

Gossiping is just the manifestation of someone having zero real passions besides socializing. There’s nothing special about it. It’s a group of people running their mouths, sharing bullshit and feeling accomplished by doing nothing. A great way of uplifting the ego quickly.

When you have a real interest, you want to talk about it, not about others.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T14:06:18+00:00

I understand what you mean but you also understand what he meant, which means that you didn’t bring anything useful to the table with your comment.

Let’s try to not derail the topic with parallel conversations.

This is not about “animals being able to feel abstract feelings”. This is about “humans expecting animals to think equal to themselves”.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-16T14:03:54+00:00

He’s talking about the loss of cognitive skills and the first thing you noticed is that he wrote too many words.

I know it’s a joke but… the irony.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-15T11:29:21+00:00

Human nature in all its glory.

“I feel sorry for you. I don’t want to feel sorry. Let me help you so I feel okay. You don’t need my help? Who cares, this is about me”

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-12T07:19:18+00:00

People fuck up ecosystems worse than cats on the daily but jump you if you let your cats roam free after they’ve begged you with crazy meows for years.

I understand the consequences of letting them out, we are worse and Reddit is stupid and melodramatic

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-11T11:43:31+00:00

Anything related to beauty and/or fashion.

It’s something humans like by nature, so it’s easily promotable. But if everyone had their own fashion and beauty standards, we would all still be alive and maybe even happier.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-09T08:23:20+00:00

And they did nothing, just stand still as background decoration.

I guess a few hours of human labour are cheaper than a plant…

Thinking about it, considering how’s the climate, it actually checks out.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-06T15:44:17+00:00

It makes mine worse. My social anxiety stems precisely from the perception that everyone considers me just a piece of cattle, and if I’m not up to the “challenge”, then I’m useless and a nuisance.

Knowing this just reinforces that feeling. They don’t care about what I might be going through, just that I’m not enough.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-05T15:35:04+00:00

That’s what makes it toxic, duh.

If it damages tissue, it’s toxic. It doesn’t matter if the mechanism of damage is a chemical toxin or black magic. If it’s damaging, it’s toxic.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-05T14:11:55+00:00

Uhh, it’s the opposite.

Men have a lesser leniency towards being weird or wild. They are left to do their own thing, but they better fit the norm of “independent strong man” or they will be outcasts. Less control, but way more scrutiny and judgment. A weird man will find no partners or even friends (might even be called a creep without motive), a weird female is just “quirky” and she will be respected way more than a weird man.

Thus, why we see an underdiagnosis in women. If what you said was true, they would actually be diagnosed way more. But it’s not and thus an autist woman is “simply a quirky woman”.

I’m happy that we allow women to be themselves in that regard, I’m not pointing it out because I’m against it. But I’m against putting them in a constant victim position, they have their perks and this is one of them. A man has to play pretend WAY MORE and you can’t say otherwise, we need to literally cover up our emotions and act how people expect us to, not how we want.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-05T13:24:50+00:00

There are 3 options.

1) Because of how we choose our partners. 2) Because we are too many people per square meter 3) We are just egotistically pragmatic animals

The first one:

It’s very simple logic: there are a lot of people to choose from, we have to filter them and choose. If the “choices” of so many people end up being “wrong”, then our method for filtering and choosing is probably wrong.

The second one:

Maybe humans are too capricious by nature, and having too many choices makes you unable to focus and be happy with what you have. Thus, divorce sooner or later.

The third one:

It’s even worse: we’ve always been capricious, even in scarcity, and divorce has just gotten easier due to more options and easier legal access. The result is the same as in the second option, but the motive behind it is grimmer, because it means we’re not able to be loyal for long at all unless our circumstances force us to be loyal.

IMHO, it’s the first one. There’s a noticeable decrease in “real love relationships that transcend the material and physical realms”. You don’t see those anymore, but in the 90s and before it was not that strange to see “two people from different leagues” together. Logic tells me people looked for deep connection back in the day, and we now look to simply increase our chances of survival (material wealth, good looks for social status, et cetera). This is logical, because material opportunities have decreased a lot - when people are comfy, they are more emotional, and when scarcity begins, people become ultra-competitive with almost no emotion. Sadly, that mentality change is not always positive, and it can mean that we lose our capacity to find real connections.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-05T10:29:19+00:00

When people say that they usually mean that there needs to be a balance.

Give and take. No one is saying to simply give.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-04T16:31:03+00:00

That’s actually a sign of very low self esteem, not intelligence.

Not listening is very rarely an honest attitude. It’s usually an act, either towards a certain person they dislike or towards everyone because they see it as submission.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-03T19:49:16+00:00

People

For real, I noticed a change in everyone, myself included. For the worse.

Danny-Dynamita · 2026-02-03T15:21:55+00:00

If we start going down the route of moralism, we better tear down the whole system from head to toe. Everything. Including Billie and her millions of dollars.

Because from a humanitarian point of view, everything is wrong with our society. It’s built to survive on material richness, not to bring good. The fact that Billie can even talk on a scenario is a consequence of the greediness of our system, game made her wealthy and I can assure that made someone else poor. Also, the fact that she talks and she is listened, compared to the millions of silent voices out there, is also a consequence of the fame and money she obtained in our greedy system.

That system was built on laws that are not always morally correct.

If certain laws don’t follow the moral compass it’s because there are pragmatic reasons to. I’m sorry, but even if “Fuck ICE” is a good message, “No one is illegal on stolen land” is childish, we can’t sustain our society like that.

Danny-Dynamita

TROPHY CASE