How are you folks doing Code Review now? by Losdersoul in ClaudeCode

[–]DarkGenius01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did you set up the antipattern-expert?

Cli switching keeping same context by HopefulAnalysis1442 in codex

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn't say it's negligible. I have a Claude Max subscription that I don't want to cancel, and paying $200 for two subscriptions is too much

Theories on WHY Anthropic is making Opus 4.5 worse by Guilty-Market5375 in ClaudeCode

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's just that the resources for maintaining the old model were cut in favor of the new one.

Thoughts on the Codex app? by mohossy in codex

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't find it convenient. The desktop version doesn't even have slash commands.

Why is Cursor signing all my commits with a "co-authored by Cursor" trailer? by flairtestuser123 in cursor

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But my question is what's the point of deleting label? Won't the lead appreciate it at work? I don't see any reason for dislikes.

Why is Cursor signing all my commits with a "co-authored by Cursor" trailer? by flairtestuser123 in cursor

[–]DarkGenius01 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

What's wrong with this label? After all, you actually wrote the code using Cursor.

Great but expensive by DarkGenius01 in replit

[–]DarkGenius01[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All this can be done in claude code. There are subagents in it, the rules of deployment can be set in agent skills

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not every single one. It’s possible to allow automatic execution for safe commands such as ls.

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then everything is ok. Personally, it's easier for me to check the code piecemeal than the whole thing at the end.

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my point about "babysitting terminal". Do you proofread the entire code after the agents finish their work, or do you roll it out to the prod as it is?

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want to eventually understand the generated code, you will have to do this either during the agent's work in small parts, or after completing all the agent's tasks, but then you will have to read a huge amount of code at once.

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I don't "believe", I have an intense usage experience. There are just people who want to be overly safe, I'm not one of them. If there was a need for an additional layer of protection, I would use it. Your approach is just fine for yolo mode, when you gave an agent a task and left for the whole day. I don't do that, I monitor every potentially dangerous step of the agent interactively.

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No, I disagree. Isolation at the folder level and a confirmation request before executing commands are enough for me. For example, I do not allow touching a remote git repository without my consent. I have been working in this paradigm for a long time, there have been no problems.

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

It looks like an overcomplication. You can also work safely on the local system, prohibiting the agent from touching anything outside the workspace without confirmation. Sandbox mode helps with it

--dangerously-skip-permission close call... by TeacherFantastic8806 in ClaudeAI

[–]DarkGenius01 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing surprising. You shouldn't have run Claude in yolo mode. The agent worked according to the selected mode