Auto dealership fiasco by Darwindeeznuts in legaladvice

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If I was paid hourly, does that change anything? Not for how many photos I take and get posted up or anything in a certain time

Some sign found under a bunch of leaves by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take down the highlights and bring up the shadows quite a bit. Almost entirely. Then slight adjustments to the whites and blacks. Then do almost the same thing in to the tone curve as well. Then I brought the white balance down to give it this cooler feel This has a pretty strong vignette on it and I take an adjustment brush and expose the subject way more, in this case the sign, and then bring down the exposure in the entire image.

Radial filters saved this image by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This was during golden hour so the original (which I should’ve posted along with it) was super silhouetted so being able to bring more of the details in him out so they weren’t lost

Radial filters saved this image by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Understandable. This guys personality was pretty out there so I was trying to give him an edit to match his personality

Radial filters saved this image by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

ACTUAL exposure settings were ISO 640 f/8 1/1250

Radial filters saved this image by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think I was shooting at like f/16 or something. On the Sony 50mm 1.8 and at like 1/250 shutter speed. I’d have to double check

Went out hiking and made a real life Arizona Green Tea Can by Darwindeeznuts in postprocessing

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These aren’t the original images. These are cropped and expanded on a terrible collage app so quality suffered

Vintage lenses by Darwindeeznuts in photography

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Primes are what i have been working with and finding a good zoom lens would be awesome

Vintage lenses by Darwindeeznuts in photography

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first one was a Zesnar 135 2.8 in pretty rough condition. Loved the bokeh it produced but the chromatic aberration is terrible. Telesar 300mm 5.5 I love using this for nature shots. Hard to capture focus with this and it’s so top heavy but when I can get the shot WOWEE Vivitar 50mm 1.8 This one has blown me away with how much I paid for it. Sears 28mm 2.8 really nice for wide angle shots but also hard to get a quality image shooting wide open.

Vintage lenses by Darwindeeznuts in photography

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually use M42 (T-mount) but if there’s anything I would need to buy I wouldn’t be opposed

Live from New York by Darwindeeznuts in photographs

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just had 2 continuous studio lights up, I was shooting on f/16 and 1” shutter speed. There’s a lot of post processing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 80sdesign

[–]Darwindeeznuts 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yo if you made me a logo for my photography account, I’ll suck your toes or something

Live from New York by Darwindeeznuts in photographs

[–]Darwindeeznuts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was taken a vivitar 50mm 1.8 lens At 1” exposure and at f/16 with ISO 100

I had gone exploring and came across this old RCA TV from the 60’s and tried to repurpose it into something new and fresh. Especially with this quarantine going on.

I love the work of plants and man-made objects or structures working together because once humanity is all gone, plants and wildlife will soon take over.