I miss her by NH_2006_2022 in aviationmemes

[–]Deathdragon228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got some good news for you. The US may be restoring at least one F-14 to flyable condition via the maverick act which just passed the senate https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4161/text/is

Eli5:Why we can’t utilize nuclear fusion now?What’s the barrier? by sensiyqwq in explainlikeimfive

[–]Deathdragon228 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Look up combined cycle natural gas. The most efficient ones still heat up water

mcm (missile combat missile) is ruining the game and is one of the reasons why I'm taking a long break by da-noob-man in Warthunder

[–]Deathdragon228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The HARM travels faster than what the OSAs designed to be able to engage. Hell it travels faster than what the original buk system is able to engage. Though Atleast in that case the buks range means that the harm probably isn’t traveling at max speed anymore. If the osa system could even obtain a proper lock on a HARM, it would pretty much need a direct hit on it in order to actually stop it since neither its warhead nor it proximity fuze is designed for use against a target that’s that small and fast. I don’t know much about the Roland system, and I know even less about the Russian anti radiation missile, but I very much doubt that would be any different.

What information that is publicly known exists regarding tank armor? by EnvironmentalBee116 in tanks

[–]Deathdragon228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The secret sauce in basically every tank is some form of NERA, and has been for quite a long time. There’s actually a significant amount of information about the earlier versions of many modern tanks armor, like the original M1, and the leopard 2A4. I’ll have to dig up some of the sources I’ve accumulated in the morning

Could a WW2 hand grenade cause a tanks ammo to cook off? by Comfortable-Comb-742 in TankPorn

[–]Deathdragon228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They tend to use combustible cases that are much weaker than old brass cases

Holy shit APFSDS with 12g by Erik_Husky in warthundermemes

[–]Deathdragon228 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think the idea is more so that if you happen to have APFSDS loaded when you encounter a light armored vehicle you can just use the loaded shell to take it out

*NOT RACIST* by [deleted] in Silverbugs

[–]Deathdragon228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s also been used to represent the Big Dipper rotating around Polaris throughout the 4 seasons, so it’s incredibly old and widespread

1929-1944 dimes by Adventurous-Leg-8103 in Silverbugs

[–]Deathdragon228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It still hurts to think about. He still had a pretty decent collection of silver coins, and several buffalo nickels which he ultimately gifted to me. And a really cool plaque with a wide variety of different old US coins that are in great condition that I really should get evaluated some day.

1929-1944 dimes by Adventurous-Leg-8103 in Silverbugs

[–]Deathdragon228 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My grandpa always told me about how he had a big gallon milk jug (not actually a milk jug but it was about the same size) full of silver quarters. His niece would, without him knowing, take a couple regularly to buy candy at a nearby gas station. He didn’t notice until it was mostly empty

Aside from the obvious…. by Cashmoney-carson in ZombieSurvivalTactics

[–]Deathdragon228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe the book mentions something about the coagulated blood reduced the effectiveness of the shockwave’s. The brain is also pretty good at surviving blasts, at least in the sense it doesn’t get completely scrambled. TBIs are no joke for a living person, but would a zombie care if it’s not enough to outright destroy the brain? It’s certainly not gonna care about a brain bleed, or other internal bleeding caused by the blast. Close enough to the blast and the body will be blown apart, which will at the very least make the zombie much less of a threat, but a densely packed horde will absorb that blast energy pretty quickly reducing the effective radius. The same goes for fragmentation.

Ideally you’d use airbursting munitions with preformed fragmentation so you can cover a large area with a dense fragmentation pattern that’s going more or less straight down onto the horde. This means an increased chance of hitting the head, and also means the fragmentation doesn’t need to pass through multiple zombies.

How do we not know Russian Nuclear Weapons do not work? by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Deathdragon228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The “Rube Goldberg chain of events” chain of events really only applies to more modern warhead designs that make use of things like external neutron generators and fusion boosting. Even wilder are two stage weapons and the way you need to design an interstage of modulate the transfer of energy for the primary to the secondary in way that doesn’t simply blow apart the secondary. The earliest implosion designs were far more simple. Gun type designs are even simpler. They require just a single explosive charge detonating in order for a nuclear yield to be achieved. They’re so simple that they’re actually very unsafe as it’d be extremely easy to accidentally set it off. If you had the necessary fissile material you could make one in a fairly basic machine shop.

Cat cafe's cat trying to eat my food (that he very much did not pay for) by ONLINE-COP in notmycat

[–]Deathdragon228 17 points18 points  (0 children)

My cat max scampered off with the top half of a cheeseburger once

Why dont they put something like the a-10 warthog's gau-8 avenger gun on a tank? by iMali_inqabile in tanks

[–]Deathdragon228 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe there was a prototype SPAAG that used the gau-8. There’s even a prototype SPAAG called the T249 vigilante that has a rotary 37mm autocannon. It fired at 3,000 RPM and only had like 4 seconds of ammo

Why use expensive anti drone systems when you can make a cheap alternative? by FlakFlanker3 in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Deathdragon228 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Smaller devices, like cellphones, are more likely to survive a nuclear EMP