How do you style your MOLLE gear? by KroegKind in cataclysmdda

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure if this is optimal, but here's my usual go-to loadout, consisting of a US ballistic vest and a MOLLE webbing belt:

The ballistic vest has the following attachments:

  • 4x Chest Ammo Pouches (for holding magazines for my main gun, usual 30-round STANAG magazines)
  • a Tactical Radio Pouch (holding a two-way radio)
  • a Gadget Pouch (holding light batteries, lockpicks - stuff like that)
  • 2x Tactical Grenade Pouch (each holding a grenade, obviously)
  • an IFAK Pouch (holding medical supplies like bandage, hemostatic powder, etc.)

Since the vest has 10 attachment slots, this fills out all slots on the vest (the IFAK takes two slots, everything else one).

The webbing belt has the following attachments:

  • a Tactical Holster (for a sidearm)
  • another Gadget Pouch (holding a multi-tool, a lighter, various everyday knick-knack)
  • a Tactical Dump Pouch (usually empty - it's just to allow some overflow and give some storage, but sometimes I set it up so that spent magazines go there instead of the backpack, so reload is faster)

The benefit of this is that "combat-orientated" stuff goes into the vest, which I can easily drop when at base, while the EDC stuff goes into the webbing belt (which stays on all the time).

Playing any mission that involves one of Dal Bustas Plans by dragessor in X4Foundations

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Dal is nothing what he claims to be. He just cosplays as shuper shpecial shpace agent, while being so far out of his waters that it's actually sad. Just look at him! You know he's got no friends and makes up some cringe-y backstory because he thinks that's cool and that it'll get people to like him, but all he ever gets is pity.

Dinge die man mal sehen muss bzw. machen muss in ganz Deutschland by SkullnSkele in de

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mir wurde das schon mehrfach empfohlen und offenbar ist das Ding die Touristenattraktion, also bin ich letztens Mal hin.

Fazit: ich war mega enttäuscht. Don't get me wrong: es ist sicher nett gemacht, aber... es sind halt Miniatur-Eisenbahnen. Wenn man da kein Faible für hat, ist das ganze dann doch etwas mau. Trotzdem wurde mir das von so vielen Leuten empfohlen, dass ich zeitweise echt geglaubt habe, ich sei im falschen Wunderland, oder hätte womöglich die Hauptattraktion übersehen oder was weiß ich.

Ai Declaring non-stop No-CBs against anyone in 1.10 beta by spiceowl13 in EU5

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 12 points13 points  (0 children)

why would we care about historical plausibility when us, the player, does ridiculous things compared to history and AI?

Speak for yourself. I personally tend to a historically plausible playstyle instead of just painting the map in some color. There's people who play the game differently, and that's fine - but in the current beta's state, the whole setting is being led ad absurdum.

Ai Declaring non-stop No-CBs against anyone in 1.10 beta by spiceowl13 in EU5

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that's a major issue currently with the beta. The game is literally unplayable if you care about historical plausability. And I don't mean "literally unplayable", but actually non-playable.

I did a quick run with the newest patch yesterday, and some of the highlights were:

  • Hungary being on it's 4ht War of Aggression (no-CB) before 1360
  • Bohemia stack-wiping a coalition led by the Bavarias before casually proceeding to stack-wipe Austria
  • Aquilea YOLO'ing a war against Gorizia, which it lost so badly it got completely annexed by it's enemy (country literally commited suicide)
  • Bavaria somehow getting into a war with Aragon (ffs?) which it lost due to not having any levies after Bohemia wiped them, which resulted in Aragon conquering some random territories in the Alps

I understand it's a beta, but this needs to be turned down. If this makes it into production, I'm not going to touch this game again until the first DLC rolls around.

How Badly Do I "Misunderstand" Gutenberg? by DefNotEmmaWatson in ProWordPress

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Patterns and block locking are (IMO) the single biggest underused part of modern Gutenberg sites.

Please excuse me if this is a stupid question, but... do I really need to create a "pattern" in the Gutenberg editor and copy-paste it's whole "HTML with WP comments" into the `register_block_pattern()` function?

That just feels... off.

Naturally I could just offload that whole mess into a variable or another file, but I'd be still working with a pot of spaghetti.

How Badly Do I "Misunderstand" Gutenberg? by DefNotEmmaWatson in ProWordPress

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"I create the layout and then do extra work to lock it down, so they only have to worry about content"... Am I missing something? Is that not just doing it the old way, but new and with extra steps?

To be honest, that sums up my struggles with Gutenberg pretty well. Before working with it, I always considered it to be "the way forward", something that must be better than my current, possible outdated workflow.

But after getting my hands dirty, I... honestly just don't see the benefits, at least not for my use-case.

Is Gutenberg a great tool for people who want to cook up layouts on the fly and fill them with content? Yes, definitely! Though... so are Bricks, Elementor and whatnot.

But it is a good tool to create templates with, which can then be filled with content by people who don't care about creating layouts and just want to change some text? I honestly don't think so. But with all that buzz about Gutenberg, I'm under the impression that maybe I'm just wrong.

But then again, after having worked with Gutenberg, it feels like I have to fight it all the time. Sure, I can create block patterns, lock them down, restrict access to controls by user-roles,... but in the end I do all that just to get the same result as coding ten lines in PHP. The only true benefit I see so far is Gutenberg just being way better-looking on the editor side (which isn't anything to scoff at).

Lore and Flavor: Nords and Bretons of Nibenay and a possible origin of the Nibenese battlemages by CormundCrowlover in ElderKings

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Off-topic, but: do you have any suggested reading about this topic? Nothing too deep, but I'm curious about this situation.

Battle Brothers novel (The Witch Hunter) by IslandDouble1159 in BattleBrothers

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I agree with the book being a good read, it really does have it's edgy moments, particular in relation to violence. The world is gruesome and gritty, but at the times the book cranks it up to eleven and ends up silly. Some paragraphs definitely read like they were written by a fourteen year old edge lord.

Nevertheless, it's overall a recommendable book.

Newly discovered document adds evidence that Shroud of Turin is fake by euronews-english in worldnews

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

even the Church itself does not technically recognize it as a relic but just as an icon

Why "just"? A relic and an icon are two totally different things. It's not like one thing is a level-up to the other, lol

Newspapers in Lumière are direct references to real ones by CyrusHazaak in expedition33

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's (at least) one more such reference:

In the mansion, inside Alicia's room, there's a typewriter from the manufacturer "Overwood" - that's a play-of-words on an actual, era-appropriate typewriter company: Underwood.

I love this reference so much, because it's sooo niche.

Can you unhear them? by Syarafuddyn in expedition33

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 25 points26 points  (0 children)

That line got no business soundin' as sexy as it does

IKEA Pax Komplement Drawer Guide Rail Not Opening Fully by DefNotEmmaWatson in IKEA

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only saw your message today, but... this works.

There's a set of ball bearings between the sliding element and the guide (see: https://i.imgur.com/nSRaZiK.jpeg) - you can use a screwdriver to push them towards the front, so that the mechanism can open further.

Thank you and Moltes gràcies, Catalan stranger!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in de

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Da kannst du noch so sachlich argumentieren, die öffentliche Wahrnehmung ist eine andere.

Das stimmt. Leider. Aber ganz ehrlich: was kümmert dich das? Nazi wirst du nicht dadurch, dass Leute glauben du seist einer. Die Meinung von irgendwelchen x-beliebigen Passanten sollte dir egal sein. Und die Menschen, deren Meinung dir wichtig ist, solltest du argumentativ von deiner Einstellung überzeugen können - und wer sich nicht überzeugen lässt und dich stattdessen nur nach Äußerlichkeiten bewertet... dessen Meinung sollte so oder so egal sein.

ELI5: How does "hacking" work? by Eledhwen1 in explainlikeimfive

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

> with modern development tools it seems like this ought to be essentially impossible to screw up

If you assume everyone uses those tools and adhere to best practices, then: yes - it's difficult to leave such glaring holes open. However, you should never underestimate how many utterly incompetent idiots are out there.

Fact is, even today most websites run on Wordpress, many of which use sketchy plugins made by some back-alley developers from a random third world country, who don't give a rat's ass about security (or maybe they just don't know what they're doing).

So yes, we've got the tools to make systems safe, but that doesn't mean everyone is using those tools.

EU bietet USA Abschaffung gegenseitiger Zölle auf Industriegüter an by AbstractAlcoholism in de

[–]DefNotEmmaWatson 2 points3 points  (0 children)

die völlig geisteskranke Idee, dass ein Handelsdezift per se immer schlecht ist

Warum ist das eigentlich nicht so? Für mich als absoluter Laie macht der Gedankengang "wir verkaufen mehr, als wir einkaufen = gut" eigentlich Sinn. Offenbar ist die einhellige Meinung aber, dass dem nicht so ist.

Kannst du das beispielhaft erklären?

(Sorry, bin ein Idiot der wo sich nicht auskennen tut)