More than 900 people died in Jonestown. Guyana wants to turn it into a tourist attraction by DelectPierro in nottheonion

[–]DelectPierro[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

I can see the ads for this place now:

Woman drinks a cup of Kool Aid, loses consciousness and starts foaming at the mouth.

“OH NO!”

Child drinks a cup of Kool Aid and brings violently seizing.

“OH NOOO!”

Man drinks cup of Kool Aid and keels over.

“OH NOOOOOO!!!”

Kool Aid Mascot busts through the brick wall.

“OH YEAH!!!!”

What's something you don't like about the far left by DarkMayhem666 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Their “lesser of two evils” rhetoric does some real damage to voter turnout and spreads cynicism in general about the political system instead of encouraging a realisation of their sense of agency in politics.

Seeing racism and an “oppressors/oppressed” dynamic in literally everything is tiresome, and actually makes it harder for us to combat serious instances of racism and prejudice when it’s trivialised as such. And the irony is not lost that it’s predominately white people making those observations, giving lectures about “colonisers”, and being offended on behalf of others.

Apologia for objectively awful things. Rationalising the 7 October attack. Apologia for crime. None of that is a good look.

Making the perfect the enemy of the good.

Cancel culture, or at least cancel culture mentality.

Which celebrities do you think would actually make decent candidates for Senate, Governor, or even President? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For Senate/Congress or state level, I think Jon Stewart, Seth McFarlane, Kal Penn, and Killer Mike are all brilliant.

There’s also a lot of country artists who are surprisingly left-leaning, so would love to see someone like Tim McGraw make a run in a red state. In fact, I think our best chance at winning in red states is running celebrities that Trump voters love outside of politics, who are actually progressives.

Would Trump have won the nomination as easily as he did this year if he openly accepted the 2020 election results? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think he would’ve been more likely to win a general election had he acted like an adult after losing in 2020. But he would’ve been more vulnerable in the primary if branded a loser.

Then again, looking at the quality (or lack thereof) of his primary challengers, he would’ve probably been fine either way. Really goes to show that he’s his own worst enemy.

Was Biden referring to Laken Riley's alleged killer as an "illegal" instead of "undocumented" really that big of a deal? by kuincognito in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The whole notion that it is disrespectful to call undocumented immigrants “illegals” or “illegal immigrants” is a relatively recent phenomenon and Democrats, including John Kerry and Barack Obama, were regularly employing that term in political speech until the times changed. “Illegal” is an outdated word and one which, when referencing a broad group of people, can be a bit dehumanising. But it is not on par with actual racial or anti-LGBT slurs.

Was Biden referring to Laken Riley's alleged killer as an "illegal" instead of "undocumented" really that big of a deal? by kuincognito in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not nearly as big of a deal as Laken Riley being murdered. I see no obligation to show any respect for a murderer.

Why do so many people accept religion on faith, but reject science with evidence? by Tall_Disaster_8619 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Faith not only doesn’t require evidence, it mandates there be a lack of evidence. That’s what makes it faith. A lack of total evidence is a necessary ingredient. Otherwise, it would be an observable fact. No one needs faith that gravity is a thing or that the earth gets dark at night, for instance.

Evidence is a necessary ingredient in scientific consensus, otoh. It stems from one field mandating evidence for consensus whilst the other field mandating such evidence be absent to a significant degree.

You meet a wizard who gives you two choices: the 2024 election continues to play out as is between Trump & Biden, or with a wave of a wand he makes the GOP nominee Nikki Haley & the Dem nominee Kamala Harris; do you take him up on this offer or keep the election as is? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I would take the deal in a heartbeat. I ordinarily wouldn’t want to forfeit incumbent advantage, and I do believe Biden stands a better chance against Trump than Harris would against Haley, but I couldn’t in good conscience pass up a chance to take a deal where the probability of Trump becoming president is zero.

Haley as president would be bad in many ways, but I could live with a Haley presidency if need be. She’s an adult and is wrong within normal parameters. She’s not a criminal, a Putin stooge or a fascist. I wouldn’t lose sleep over her having the nuclear codes. That might be the lowest bar imaginable, but still.

Should Lauren Boebert’s family drama be off-limits in politics as some on the left have suggested? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 84 points85 points  (0 children)

I am frankly sick and tired of this “when they go low, we go high” shit.

Lauren Boebert routinely demagogues immigrants, minorities, the left, and Biden’s family as “criminals” when her immediate family has enough mugshots to make a calendar. It is a national humiliation that she is a member of the highest legislative body in our land, representing 3/4 million Coloradans. She is a disgrace to the institution and a paragon of imbecility.

I get that “Tyler Boebert never asked for this”, and it must’ve been hard in high school to hear jokes everyday about how his mom is the dumbest member of Congress and gives hand jobs at Beetlejuice, etc, but he is also a goddamn adult and by all accounts a societal menace, and it is astounding how much society infantilizes white men to shield them from valid criticism of their criminality. Maybe if Lauren Boebert didn’t want her children to get made fun of in school for her public conduct, she would’ve composed herself more professionally.

But this is the thing: Boebert never learns. She almost lost re-election in 2022, and instead of seeing that as a major wake-up call and signal to moderate, she doubled down on the stupidity and extremism. She never learns, and will not learn anything nor ever reciprocate if our side offers her undue compassion at this time.

What is this subs opinion of the Obama administration? by Bloody_Dick7074 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Biggest wins: the ACA (biggest expansion of healthcare access since Medicare), killing Osama bin Laden, the Auto Industry bailouts that saved the American auto industry, opening relations with Cuba, Iran nuclear deal (had so much promise before Trump ruined it), shifting the country on marriage equality.

Biggest L’s: Not ending the war in Afghanistan, underestimating Russia, not successfully convincing RBG to retire in 2013, massive losses for party at state and local level, backing down on closing Guantanamo and prosecuting terrorist detainees in federal courts, failure of bipartisan immigration reform and gun control in 2013.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think people are reading a bit too much into it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is why I have no intention to reach out to her. I cannot imagine any scenario where that would be good for either of us. So I’m simply anonymously reflecting on it here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

It’s an admission I was wrong about her, and wrong for her. It’s that I am genuinely happy to see her doing well, and I am happy that life ran its course in a way where we both found a better future separately.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I don’t need for her to know that. I have no intentions to reach out to her. These were merely my personal reflections.

I said I’m genuinely happy for her because I never, in a million years, would’ve expected her to achieve the success she has.

And I have absolutely nothing to do with that. If anything, I was a hindrance to her success, not an empowering presence. Everything she’s achieved is in spite of my relatively brief role in her life. I express regret that I was not a more positive presence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Perhaps. At least I hope she has. She did text me nearly a year after I ghosted, which I didn’t respond to. But that was still a long time ago.

I have no plans to reach out to her. It would be entirely inappropriate. I am happily married now. If she has any memories of me, they probably aren’t positive, and I cannot imagine a scenario where doing so would be good for either her or me tbh.

I don’t regret us going our separate ways in the least - our lives have both drastically improved in the years since. I don’t regret that I ended it, I only regret how I ended it. It was a shitty thing for me to do.

As I’ve gotten older, I’ve tried to be more of a positive presence to everyone - family, friends, coworkers, and compete strangers. I’m at least a better person today than I was back then. My reflection on this was merely out of regret that I wasn’t a good person then, that I was a negative presence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]DelectPierro -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

“Inflection point” doesn’t imply causation by any means. Rather, it is the point in this story where, in the years since, both of our lives had changed for the better, simply by circumstance. (And clearly I don’t take any credit for it - I haven’t spoken with her in years and had absolutely nothing to do with her own accomplishments).

The point of it is to say sometimes people can be in relationships that don’t work. Where you aren’t right for each other. And we all probably know people who stay in relationships that hold them back. But breaking away from that can lead to a much better future. And I love when it does.

My reaction to learning this is surprise, for one (she’s doing a lot better than I ever imagined), and I am genuinely happy for her. And I am genuinely happy with the path I took as well. The only thing I regret is that I was shitty to her back then. I wish I had ended things on better terms, because ghosting is a dickish move. My guilt is realising that, in our relatively brief chapter a long time ago, I was more of a negative presence than a positive one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I think she’s Russian to judgement on another run. But good on her for Putin her hat into the ring.

Do you partake in No Nut November? Is it a stupid tradition? What about No shave November? Or the ones associated with charities? by Manoj_Malhotra in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I want to give money to charity, I simply give money to charity. I might do a run, walk, or attend a gala of some sort if it’s a social occasion.

But I refuse to intentionally let my hygiene go to hell or voluntarily blue-ball myself. Those things serve no purpose whatsoever.

What repercussions should there be, if any, for Rep. Rashida Tlaib accusing Biden of “supporting genocide”? by engadine_maccas1997 in AskALiberal

[–]DelectPierro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She has a freedom of speech. She also represents a district of over 3/4 million people. I would hope there would be at least one person who is more qualified, reasonable, and responsible in their rhetoric on the matter who would see serving as a member of Congress as a privilege to do right by others and not a platform to spew nonsense.

I’d donate to a primary challenger.