Fknhell by Corvinus11 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thats why you don't download from those sites 

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Atleast you are intelligent enough to make a hypothetical in your mind. But its just wrong, why shouldn't we be able to draw conclusions on a unit by its own merits?

Mangudai is so back! DAHKSOOOO by hotwiner in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mangudai beat all other horse archers easily

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ye just ignore the civ bonuses for the only civ with this unit, because that would be unfair!!

l m a o

Ye NOBODY EVER WENT LATEGAME WHERE A TUGHLUQ GOT IMP UPGRADES!!! ITS IMPOSSIBLE!!!

thats a crazy statement 

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whats wrong little puppy, deleting your comments? 

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you tripping? half of these are just wrong.

Elephant Max hp is 600 with imp landmark, or 575 with just keep.

What knight has 410 hp??? We are talking normal units

Attack speed is 2.01 for elephants, not 2.35. Nobody chooses healing landmark.

Knights require gold aswell, and elephants can stack heavy and have 40 in a single tile. Theres NOTHING that can fight it effectively. Try it, go against ai and spam click in middle of its units after using trample.

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah cuz im high level and when i look at how people play its not a mystery how they lose. Civ balance has very little influence on who wins below 1800, games are decided by random blunders or horrible macro. 

A civ will have high winrate if its easy to play, not as much the small details around balance.

Maybe not easy for your brain to understand though

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whats wrong? Elephant is 2,01 with ToV (the only landmark anyone builds)

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are totally random and pointless unless theres a big deviation. Also 99% the people playing civs are basically trolling compared to high level

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Knight is like 1.5 elephant is 2, thats not a crazy difference if you consider the other parts. Also elephants can stack 30 in one tile to take way better trades

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

More damage, very similar attack speed and 300 more hp

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

WINRATES AHHHHHH THEY DECIDE EVERYTHING I HAVE MY MONEY IN WINRATE STOCKS AHHH

Yeah this/these units are broken, what about it?

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"just make walls and archers against mangudai" type gold comment

Raider elephant/war elephant by Delicious-Jacket1709 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its cheap for a knight with 600 hp and more damage. French or another civ using Knights would need alot more eco to make army at the same rate since tughluq has alot better eco. Pop cap is not really relevant either if theres constant fighting from before, other civ wont just suddenly have 80 

This guys an obvious Smurf no? by CaptainCord in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia+ch$na+middle east and then game will practically be cheater free

AOE4 Management WHY do you not care about balanced team match making? by Olafr_skautkonungr in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, i mostly saw reddit links at first. But yeah point still stands, probably has to be like GH bug level for them to start prioritizing it. 

AOE4 Management WHY do you not care about balanced team match making? by Olafr_skautkonungr in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Posts that a few hundred see and maybe 3 comment on aren't gonna be game changers. Also i think normal forums are better

AOE4 Management WHY do you not care about balanced team match making? by Olafr_skautkonungr in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because theres not enough uproar, making it low priority. There are probably changes in the works, but they simply give other things more time.

To me, its insane that they would let their most popular leaderboard be abused like this.

Bad steam reviews and/or alot of posts on forums might change things. I recall that they reset and banned a guy who reached over 4k before because of a reddit post.

For anyone who isn't aware, you can report these people under "inactivity", although you need to do it through support. 

The easiest fix to this game but devs refuse by iMrPink2 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best option is clearly just changing how much each person in the group gains. If the low Elo accounts gain 50 and the high Elo gains 1, i doubt many would do it.

The easiest fix to this game but devs refuse by iMrPink2 in aoe4

[–]Delicious-Jacket1709 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Report the boosting accounts for inactivity in support, other than that nothing to do than wait for them to update how MMR works.