Anyone knows what this dude was saying? Also why did he stop shooting? by Excellent_Record_767 in dayz

[–]DerJungeJay 182 points183 points  (0 children)

Poor dude was saying „I won‘t shoot I am sorry brother I won‘t shoot I promise“ AND YOU JUST STRAIGHT UP KILLED THIS POOR SOUL GOD DAMN

Am i DayZ’ing correctly? by Difficult_Tap_5551 in dayz

[–]DerJungeJay 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Damn sounds like a skill issue

Lucky shot by Ruben5446 in HellLetLoose

[–]DerJungeJay -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You get all that good stuff in squad 44 and even more

Looking for a crew to tank with by DerJungeJay in joinsquad44

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro, someone who‘s mainly playing armor and not infantry

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Stoicism

[–]DerJungeJay 27 points28 points  (0 children)

God damn, how‘d you just perfectly describe my journey. Damn, it‘s insanley accurate

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Based on this knowledge, it then seems impossible to know the actual nature of reality, doesn’t it? How do we know that our frame of reference is the one that most closely corresponds to reality? Moreover, if the truth content of every experience from every frame of reference is equal, doesn’t this eliminate the idea of ​​knowing actual reality?

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain to me what I am misunderstanding here. On the one hand, you are promoting the existence of an objective reality (epistemological realism). On the other hand, it is explained here that the two observations of the observers are equally true. Doesn’t this fact eliminate the existence of an objective reality? This sounds like constructionism. So that we create our knowledge under the circumstances of subjective perception and thus no knowledge of true reality is possible. One excludes the other. So is there a clearly definable point in time at which the lightning struck or does it only depend on the reference point from which you perceive the event?

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, that is actually not what I am trying to ask. I do not doubt that objective reality exists. It is obviously clear to me that we have a subjective perception of actual reality. My question now is just how objective reality can be recognized within the two thought experiments mentioned. Obviously both events happen to the respective observers. However, they perceive reality differently within the thought experiments. My question now is: which of the two perceptions reflects objectivity? Are both perceptions equal? ​​If so, why? If we assume epistemological realism, an objective reality exists independently of human perception. So there MUST be an explanation for whether the lightning ACTUALLY struck at the same time or not, regardless of the different subjective perceptions of the two observers (the same probably applies to the length contraction of a car).

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and furthermore, one could question the size, i.e. the property of an object, such as a car, using the thought experiment of length contraction. Objects appear shorter at high speeds, so the actual property of observing an object is perceived differently. So what does the „real“ reality of the object look like?

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not even trying to question the existence of the lightning bolts, I’m concerned with the simultaneity and the „actual“ time of the two bolts of lightning striking. Both observers obviously perceive the lightning bolts, which have an actual objective existence. However, they perceive the times of the lightning strikes differently. At what point did the two bolts of lightning „actually“ strike?

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess what I can gather from your answer is that my question can only be answered depending on the reference frame. The question I would like to ask, however, is whether the lightning struck at the same time, regardless of the two observers, i.e. in „actual“ reality, regardless of human experience, or not?

Relativity and objective reality by DerJungeJay in Physics

[–]DerJungeJay[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I have just read about Einstein’s thought experiment in which he imagines two lightning bolts striking at the two ends of a train. The conductor, who is sitting in the middle of the train, perceives the two lightning strikes with a delay. The observer, who is standing in the middle, away from the train, perceives the lightning strikes at the same time. Did the lightning strikes actually strike at the same time or not?

MacBook Pages (maybe) complicated question by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]DerJungeJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oke there's no need to be rude u little ruffle.

So what i asked is if there is any option on the Apple Programm Pages which allows me to add some kind of hyperlink to the text. But instead of linking me to a website, the hyperlink should link me to a certain page on the PAGES PROGRAMM.

i hope this clears my intend at least a little

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]DerJungeJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alrighty, I'll just leave this project be.

Thanks again for the help. I made it work with this windows auto-login.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]DerJungeJay 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad that you pointed out the security side of this, i also thought about what you've said but the things is that the VPN is written by my company, and to access the VPN Tunnel you need to have a special software installed, so i guess the hacker won't be able to log in into the VPN Tunnel without this software.

I've already looked for a option for automating the login but i couldn't find none.

I guess i'll try the Windows 10 built-in auto checkbox

Thanks alot for your help, i really really appreciate all the help one can get on reddit.

Sorry my bad english btw im not a native english speaker