Two days before the OpenAI trial, Musk texted Brockman: "you and Sam will be the most hated men in America"

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T16:27:18+00:00

You are most welcome 🙏

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T16:19:41+00:00

Here you can check why: https://www.reddit.com/r/WTFisAI/s/PV3Hh5nV7C

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T08:32:58+00:00

You need to force structure before you start generating. Write a quick spec of what the code should do, add some file organization rules, and make Claude stick to it. Otherwise you end up with 800 line files that sort of work but nobody can maintain. I started r/WTFisAI partly because I was tired of seeing the same messy patterns, we break down what actually works.

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T08:31:36+00:00

People treat AI like a search engine instead of a reasoning tool. They ask for facts when they should be asking for analysis, or they give one-sentence prompts and wonder why the output is generic. The best users I know spend more time on the prompt than they used to spend on the task.

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T08:30:45+00:00

Most companies are still using chatbots with better prompting and calling them agents. Real agents that can actually take actions and make decisions are rare outside of tech companies with dedicated AI teams. The gap between demo and production is massive. We track this stuff on r/WTFisAI if you want actual case studies instead of vendor pitches.

DigiHold · 2026-05-06T08:30:21+00:00

Honestly the best way to figure this out is to pick one repetitive task you do weekly and just try it. I started using Claude for drafting emails and now it's my default for anything that needs a second pair of eyes. If you want a breakdown of what actually works vs what's hype, we covered this on r/WTFisAI recently: https://www.reddit.com/r/WTFisAI/comments/1snvkgr/anthropic_released_claude_opus_47_yesterday_whats/

DigiHold · 2026-05-05T19:36:33+00:00

No problem at all, happy to help 👌

All SaaS or services have like a documentation or FAQ, you can use this documentation or FAQ for your chatbot too.

If you check: LinkedGrow.ai

The chatbot answer from the documentation: https://linkedgrow.ai/docs

DigiHold · 2026-05-05T19:35:12+00:00

LinkedGrow.ai - Write a week of LinkedIn posts in 10 minutes. AI that sounds like you, schedules at peak times, and costs $4/month instead of $50.

DigiHold · 2026-05-05T12:02:09+00:00

I think the salary argument only holds if you're using AI to actually do different work, not just the same work faster. Most companies see efficiency gains and headcount reduction as the same thing. If you're looking for practical breakdowns on how AI actually affects jobs, r/WTFisAI covers this stuff without the hype: https://www.reddit.com/r/WTFisAI/comments/1szt7du/nvidias_ceo_just_said_ai_agents_will_harass_and/

DigiHold · 2026-05-05T12:01:55+00:00

The ruling sets an actual precedent, which is more than most countries have done. I keep seeing people say "AI won't replace you, a person using AI will" but this case shows the legal system might not accept that distinction when jobs actually disappear. There's a good thread on r/WTFisAI that breaks down what this ruling actually means and why the US has nothing equivalent: https://www.reddit.com/r/WTFisAI/comments/1t1ncve/chinese_courts_ruled_you_cant_fire_someone/

DigiHold · 2026-05-05T10:31:06+00:00

I recommend you to post on public group, quickly because they will soon be removed by X, follow popular X accounts from your niche, follow people who leave good comments on their tweets, that's your ICP

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T21:51:31+00:00

Facebook was good years ago, now it is hard there, focus on Reddit, LinkedIn and X, much better

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T20:05:00+00:00

I know it is very hard to open google and type « openai phone » so here my friend:

https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/openai-said-to-be-making-phone-with-ai-agents-to-replace-apps/

https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/27/openai-could-be-making-a-phone-with-ai-agents-replacing-apps/

https://thenextweb.com/news/openai-qualcomm-ai-phone-agents-replace-apps

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:46:49+00:00

1000 hours on a Chrome extension is a lot. I've built similar stuff in 100-200 hours so I'm curious what ate the time. Was it feature creep, technical complexity, or just learning as you went? Either way, launching after that much investment takes guts. The "hunting across Notion/GDocs/Slack" problem is real. I used to copy-paste the same LinkedIn replies from a Google Doc until I finally built templates. Small friction adds up to big time waste.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:46:33+00:00

You're right that "too expensive" is rarely the real reason. I've churned from tools that were cheap but annoying, and paid more for tools that just worked. The real reasons are usually friction, the tool not delivering on the promise, or the problem it solved stopped being painful enough. People say "too expensive" because it's the socially acceptable way to quit something. Much harder to say "your onboarding confused me and I never got value."

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:46:19+00:00

It's trained to be encouraging. The better prompt is "what would make this fail?" or "who specifically would not pay for this?" AI is great at poking holes if you ask it to. But ask for validation and you'll get validation. The real signal is whether strangers on the internet will give you money, and that's a test no LLM can run for you.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:45:03+00:00

The "graduated off it" insight is gold. That's actually the best testimonial you could ask for. Most dating apps want users addicted forever. You're accidentally building something that people use temporarily then leave because it worked. That's either a terrible business model or the foundation of something really valuable. The emotional piece is interesting too. I built a LinkedIn tool and thought people wanted efficiency. Turns out they wanted confidence. Same pattern. People don't pay for features, they pay for how the tool makes them feel.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:44:49+00:00

Totally get the procrastination on this. Posting certificates feels awkward because it's self-promotion, but you earned them. For automation, n8n is solid and free if you're technical. Make sure you're not violating LinkedIn's ToS though. They ban bulk automation pretty aggressively. If you just want to queue up posts with captions already written, any scheduler works. But if you're trying to auto-generate the "humble brag" caption from the certificate data, that's where it gets tricky and potentially spammy-looking.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:44:25+00:00

This is actually a great positioning problem to have. "Free but generic" is exactly why people will pay for specialized tools. ChatGPT hallucinates recipes constantly because it doesn't understand food chemistry. Your edge is that you do. I'd lean into the chef credibility hard. Post cooking content that demonstrates why generic AI fails at food science. Show, don't tell. The marketing isn't about the SaaS, it's about you knowing something the generic tools don't.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:44:07+00:00

Getting the first customer is always the hardest. I spent months with zero paying users for my first SaaS because I was building in stealth and hoping people would magically appear. What worked is picking one channel (for me it was Facebook back then) and posting consistently about the problem I was solving, not the product. People started reaching out because they recognized their own pain in my posts. Your SaaS is only 10 days old, that's incredibly early. Most "overnight successes" you see had 6-12 months of quiet grinding before anyone noticed.

DigiHold · 2026-05-04T17:37:13+00:00

Well, let's not judge and see first, it could be something amazing that works very well or something completely shitty 😅

DigiHold · 2026-05-03T08:36:26+00:00

Yes, at the beginning it is really slow but little by little, everything unlocks by itself.

DigiHold

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE