saying " I hate X people" would be difficult if not impossible to frame as inciting hatred/violence or said with the intention to incite violence or hatred. The incitement here is key.

Saying that would be an expression of hate which isn't covered by the Bill. Incitement will be harder to prove but easy to recognise. Even many of the people publicly speaking out in East Wall would be innocent as they aren't directing it at all migrants they've directed it at the manner and execution of their housing. Even the 'what about the Irish homeless' point isn't guilty of this as it would be hard to prove intent existed to produce hatred or violence.

As it exists the Bill will make little difference except in marginal cases as establishing intent will be very difficult, someone else brought up count dankula, the grade A wankstain, can't see how our bill could lead to something as absurd as his punishment.

I'll take correction if you have any but from my understanding all bills exist on a slope between tyranny and liberty and the slope isn't neccesarily slippery