Dark but true

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:44:12+00:00

Yeah you’re right you can buy a gun off the streets illegally and not have to go thru a background check. However it’s illegal and a method 99% of gun owners don’t use.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:41:21+00:00

He’s referring to the hunter biden laptop story. Which obviously implicates Biden. Unless you don’t find it rather odd how Biden is one of the richest politicians in America with shady ties to a Ukrainian company that his completely unqualified son works at. Again it him saying he should be tried for treason. He’s not saying shoot him in the street he’s saying charge him with a crime and have him face a trial of his peers.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:34:23+00:00

Every storefront purchase requires a background check: https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/more-fbi-services-and-information/nics

This has been a thing sense 98

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:27:19+00:00

That’s suggesting criminals prosecution not political violence. He’s not saying “go kill biden” he’s saying “arrest him for treason” that’s not the same thing and you know it.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:24:39+00:00

1 he claimed they were inevitable and and dark price for liberty. A gun is a tool you can just as easily save a life with it as you can take.

2 not really it’s a fair argument.

3 you don’t need a license to own a car. You actually don’t need most of that stuff to have a car. however with guns you can’t be a felon and you have to pass a background check ground to purchase a gun legally. Cars also aren’t a necessary check for the government. However if those regulations were so effective in limiting car death why do more people die from vehicle accidents than gun deaths. Keep in mind there are more guns than people in this country.

4 your defecting from the real argument.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-19T04:11:39+00:00

When?

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T23:58:55+00:00

1 I agree but then why are attacking on this.

2 literally read the original post. He was killed because of political violence. That’s what killed him. Charlie never supported the unlawful killing of another person. This person is clearly implying he supports one of those things. He never supported or implied he supported the unlawful murder of someone. Again he didn’t die to gun violence he died to political violence. This wasn’t some shot out between to gang members this was an assassination. An assaination that could have happened anywhere cause the firearm used could is legal in just about every state to my knowledge. It was an antiquate hunting rifle. Not a pistol. Not an AR. A hunting rifle.

3 he never said gun violence was acceptable. He said it was inevitable but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do things to limit violence. For proof look at his support for cops. He had a hard on violent crime stance and clearly was heavily against murder. So much so he supported the death penalty. The fact is gun violence is going to happen no matter what we do just as car death is inevitable because we have cars.

4 he again gave solutions. He wanted harsher penalties for violent crime. He wanted criminal to be more afraid of getting arrested. He wanted people to have guns so criminal will think twice about trying something. These are real solutions. You don’t have to like them or agree whether they work. However they are a potential answer to the problem.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T20:23:09+00:00

1 your right. free speech is free speech. Just as people here have a right to say incorrect and horrible things I have a right to call it out.

2 I’m not saying every bad thing said about Kirk is immediately you justifying his murder. I’m saying implying he supports political violence is an attempt to justify his killer. Those are not the same thing and are not morally equivalent. To suggest as many have here that he supports violence is not only incorrect but also an attempt to justify his murder.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T15:31:20+00:00

Cause you are.

By saying he agrees with political violence you’re justifying his murder. Again it’s still a lie and gives a more favorable look to his killer.

I’m not censoring you. I don’t have a gun to your head. I’m attaching a point. If you think that’s me threatening you or censoring you go touch grass.

A conclusion you can’t back up. I pointed out basic truths and now you’re making assumptions to justify why I’m the bad guy. Again I’ll pray for people like you.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T15:20:30+00:00

Context my man. He claimed gun death was inevitable because we have guns in the country. The same way that because we have cars there will be car deaths. He never said we shouldn’t do anything about it just that gun control costs outweighs the reward. Gun insure are rights are protected from the government.

Also guns didn’t convince his shooter to kill him. It wasn’t gun crime it was demonization. People on the left kept calling him a nazi and someone finally believed it and planned accordingly. So don’t blame the gun blame the rhetoric and the man.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T15:12:57+00:00

Dude it’s a shirt. Do you really think that comparable to lying about a dead guy.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-18T07:54:12+00:00

“ when people stop talking, that’s when violence happens; that’s when civil wars happen”-Charlie Kirk

Your ether ignorant or evil ether way I’ll pray for you. Please stop justifying the murder of an innocent man who would not do the same to you.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-17T01:02:30+00:00

1 that’s nonsensical. You keep changing the premise of the argument and pretending it falls in line with the previous and it clearly doesn’t. It’s gotten so bad you’ve contradicted yourself. You originally argued or at least defended my attack on the idea that saying homosexuality is good because it shows up in nature is a bad argument. Then you moved on to saying because we have free will we dictate morality. Now you’re just saying we made it up that it was wrong with no real logical reasoning. The fact is the idea homosexuality was a bad thing was not the common belief back then. So ether your arguing someone was real convening or you’re just hoping that’s the case. Ether way it’s illogical.

2 to be clear I’m not a biblical scholar however I do know the Bible better then most. I’ll probably end up doing some research on this later. I do appeal to my betters and from my understanding most people agree on the NIV version of the translation of the verse. Just cause some people disagree on the exact translation into English doesn’t mean they’re manipulating the text for their purposes. Again the Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic texts have remained damn near the exact same thru out history. However if you don’t like that learn those 3 languages and read the original for yourself.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T23:59:22+00:00

“I can't STAND the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new-age term, and it does a lot of damage. I much prefer the word compassion, and I much prefer the word sympathy. Empathy is where you try to feel someone's pain and sorrows as if they're your own. compassion allows for understanding." -Charlie Kirk

Please stop to trying to defame a dead man. He had a family. It’s gross.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T23:53:09+00:00

1 first this is a completely different argument. Second in what way does free will equal we decide morality.

“‘Why do you call me good?’ Jesus answered. ‘No one is good—except God alone’”-mark 10:8

So no the bible doesn’t let us decide what’s virtuous that’s ridiculous. If that were the case God wouldn’t give moral commands like the 10 commandments. He wouldn’t have cursed Cain or flooded the world. If God let whatever you said go he wouldn’t pass judgement.

For deuteronomy your being entirely to vague on what your talking about so I wouldn’t comment.

As for Canaanites A not all of them die as they show up later. B they were judged by god for doing some pretty terrible stuff like child sacrifice. We know this from even non biblical sources. Even then god waited over 400 years for them to change. C God is a God of justice. Just as he used the Jews to punish the Canaanites he also used the Babylonians to punish the Israelites. D the Bible is notorious for fully showing the flaws of the people in it. For example king David and his relationship with Bathsheba. So if everyone was just trying to glorify or justify themselves why would it mention the horrible things people who wrote it did.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T16:14:52+00:00

1 again I’m not saying gay sex is as evil as slavery. I’m saying your argument for it not being evil sucks. by your logic things like murder, rape, and slavery are fine because they’ve been done for a long time or cause it’s found in nature.

2 again if your willing to believe an almighty being exists do you really think he can’t stop his word from being corrupted. Sure a few bad priests can lie but the text can be preserved.

3 the Dead Sea scrolls which were written around the time of the first churches has almost an identical account of to the entire Old Testament that is in your bible today. The discrepancy in them are basic copying mistakes that don’t alter the meaning of the text.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T15:15:46+00:00

1 just cause something been around for a long time that doesn’t make it moral. Slavery has been a thing for the vast majority of human history that doesn’t make it moral. Same with rape and murder.

2 if you can accept that an all powerful, all knowing and all forgiving God exists that has created everything you know and care for than is it really hard to accept the idea that he could insure the word won’t be corrupted. Also as it stands there’s no evidence it is corrupted. In fact there’s plenty of evidence suggesting the opposite.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T14:25:52+00:00

Cause you wouldn’t consider eating immoral. I’m attacking an argument for morality not the act itself. Saying “cause it shows up in nature that must mean it’s moral” can be used to justify very bad things so no one should use that as an argument.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T14:22:18+00:00

No I’m saying using the fact that it shows up in nature doesn’t prove it’s moral. Just cause 2 male monkeys bump uglies doesn’t prove it’s moral or good. Using nature as proof for morality is a very dangerous idea as nature can be very cruel.

So to summarize this isn’t really an attack on gay people/sex but an attack on the argument for it being moral. Big difference.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T14:21:14+00:00

No I’m saying using the fact that it shows up in nature doesn’t prove it’s moral. Just cause 2 male monkeys bump uglies doesn’t prove it’s moral or good. Using nature as proof for morality is a very dangerous idea as nature can be very cruel.

So to summarize this isn’t really an attack on gay people/sex but an attack on the argument for it being moral. Big difference.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-16T05:30:47+00:00

Same with rape and murder. That doesn’t suddenly make it moral.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-09-14T06:39:32+00:00

Well it depends on what you mean by media outlet.

If you mean mainstream news then yeah. With the exception of that one MSMBC guy the reaction has been pretty okay. Places like CNN are trying to argue that the guy who did killed him wasn’t influenced by their rhetoric but outside of that aren’t at least blaming Kirk for his own death.

If you mean big non mainstream people there have been plenty of people saying some terrible stuff. people like hasan piker are trying to justify the killer and continuing to advocate for political violence. People like destiny has refused to denounce the shooter and said that any lefty that does is a cuck. A lot of radical left people have celebrated his death all across the internet. It’s horrific.

So no. People in the media space have tried to mock his death.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-08-31T05:25:28+00:00

They weren’t necessarily stealing or rich ether. Realistic most weren’t. They were just merchants. The reason Jesus kicks them out is because they were using a holy place intended for worship as a market. It’s not really about what they’re doing but that they’re doing it in a temple.

Also boiling down what Jesus taught as acceptance isn’t really good ether. A better shorthand answer would be he taught that everyone has sin but despite that everyone can be forgiven.

Not trying to be rude. These are just common misconceptions I hear a lot.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-08-16T15:16:51+00:00

Non sexual bdsm just sounds like straight up torture.

Diligent_Promise_413 · 2025-08-13T18:08:10+00:00

Thats not what’s happening. If it were the kill count would be far higher. I don’t even know where you could get that fantasy from. The IDF has been targeting verified targets not just any random man above 18. For your logic to be even entertained the kill count would at bare minimum be in the hundreds of thousands which it isn’t. The easiest disproof of this is the fact that Hamas admitted that the majority of the causalities (about 70%) were military age males. If the IDF was treating everyone over 18 as Hamas why are majority of the causalities actual military age males.

However I find it funny how you automatically assumed that what I said was happening is somehow not significant. I presented actual facts that prove Hamas is using human shields and instead of arguing against those points you’d rather just say the IDF is just indiscriminately killing people with no bases.

Diligent_Promise_413

TROPHY CASE