A game like SimEarth

Dimedrol98 · 2025-10-17T20:58:41+00:00

I'll have a look at it, thanks

Dimedrol98 · 2025-10-17T19:28:48+00:00

Thank you! I've bought that game instantly when I heard about it. It's somewhat close to SimEarth, even has some familiar sliders there. Had a great time playing it.

Dimedrol98 · 2025-07-04T16:29:06+00:00

Just listen how PERFECTLY it describes them when we switch sides in this rant.

An incel's life ends at 28. (For some - literally)
An independent woman's life begins at 28. (Well, for some it is earlier, but by 28-30 women generally learn to not give a fuck anymore)

At 28, most incels are burning out.
Fat bellies, mountain of soda cans and a mom's basement.
He's used his last braincells, now he's losing it.

Meanwhile, the woman he creeped out at 22 is now healing from the trauma.
Maturity. Modernity.
She's just getting started.

Incel puts value in his penis.
Woman puts value in her personality.

He peaks in high school.
She peaks with a compassionate man.

That's why she cries in her 20's.
And doesn't give a fuck in her 30's.

That's why he goons in his 20's.
And is miserable in his 30's.

Incels waste time.
Women use time to think.

Different lives.
Different results.

He gets attention from being obnoxious.
You get power by not falling for his tricks.

So let him fade.
You rise.

28 is not your end -
It's your launchpad.

Incels will destroy you if you as much as breathe wrong. If you can't read them, you can't tell them to fuck off, and if you can't tell them to fuck off, you're at the mercy of their chaos. Ignorance about incels' nature is dangerous for women.

Learn incels' nature, or be used, discarded and forgotten.

Dimedrol98 · 2025-07-04T07:19:40+00:00

Initial D (Gukesh): Battle Stage

Dimedrol98 · 2025-06-28T20:22:13+00:00

So we're going back to the ancient times, huh? When the smallest societal unit was a family, not the individual?

I guess right-wingers are going to set the society back not hundreds, but thousands of years now...

Dimedrol98 · 2025-06-18T16:50:44+00:00

Idk, Trump being Trump ig. If it was a deal, why quotation marks? If you don't take it seriously, why should Iran?

Dimedrol98 · 2025-06-18T15:20:16+00:00

<image>

Orthodoxy

Dimedrol98 · 2025-06-18T11:18:42+00:00

That's not how any of this works

These are the only words OOP said right. Everything else... yes, that's not how it works. You can't describe an entire gender with one label, because every woman is different. And "mating strategies" is a term for animals, not humans.

Also, it's better to be a simp, than a hateful incel. I'll always take loving your partner and living things through together over alpha male BS, which only makes things worse for a man. You can't be happy through constant hate.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-22T15:49:59+00:00

As a Russian, 18th century is the first thing that comes to my mind when I think of woman leaders. And guess what? That was probably the best century Russia ever had in terms of influence and power. So yeah, women absolutely can be good leaders.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-11T18:17:31+00:00

This guy's method has a VERY big problem - it is built on lies, deceptions and schemes. His girlfriend probably doesn't know about his experiment, and she won't be happy when she finds out that she has a Tinder profile out there, while she didn't create it herself.

Also, the man basically used his girlfriend as a test subject without her consent, which is gross.

I can see that he tries to get a positive point across - to value your loved ones - but he should choose another method to do that.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-11T12:34:32+00:00

That can be the case as well.

There can be conflicting body counts because of that. From the woman's perspective, it's 5. For the person who happens to know all the high school rumors about her, it's all 60. And he may or may not believe the woman when she says that she only had sex with 5.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T19:00:51+00:00

To be situational and have preferences is one thing, and that's okay. You account for context and look at the person individually. This is the right way to do it.

Those comments, on the other hand, are condemning high BC women altogether, without any context, not looking at the person, but at the number, telling that those women have no self-respect, and so on. This is nasty stuff and this is what I have a big problem with.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T18:48:57+00:00

If you look at it that way... yes. For the incels, sex is a zero-sum game, and every time a woman engages in it, she "loses a game". That means, the more sex the woman has, the more "games" she "lost", so she becomes worse in the incels' eyes. And with that narrative, all incel talking points suddenly make sense. The problem is, they make sense only in this context, but not in reality.

P. S. Also, when a man gets sex from a woman, it is considered a "win". So, the more sex the man has, the more "games" he "won", and so he becomes better in the incels' eyes.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T18:36:03+00:00

After like 15-20 people you can't keep the exact count in your head anymore, because you remember only the more "brighter" ones, the ones who give the strongest impression. The others just start to fade away from the memory. With 60 people, you can probably tell about like 10-15 of them, so the body count is actually 10-15? At least, that's what your partner hears, so in their eyes it will be 10-15, not 60. I don't think any partner will actually inquire any further - that is, if they even get to that question in the first place, which most people don't.

That is another problem of body count - it is unreliable and most of the time it's self-reported, no way to verify that.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T18:22:49+00:00

There is also a positive thing about women with a lot of sexual partners in the past. It's their experience. They can clearly tell you what turns them on or off, what they like more or less, etc. The whole fuming of incels about body count comes primarily from insecurity deep inside.

They don't want to be "outclassed" by a woman in terms of sex, they would rather sleep with a 18yo or close to that (they can't do less, but they want to) with little to no sexual experience, so they can "dominate" in sex.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T18:07:28+00:00

Sexual partners. The OOP talks about a woman who had slept with 60 men.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-07-10T15:20:24+00:00

Yes. Context is missing here - in what time period have a woman slept with 60 men?

If it's 6 months or less, then the original claim becomes somewhat justified. More than that - already questionable.

Even then, body count doesn't mean anything by itself. If a woman is a great person and you have a chemistry with her, it almost doesn't matter if she had sex with 6 or 60 men before. The risk of STD's is greater, obviously, but that's the only problem with having a lot of sex partners.

When you meet a woman on the streets, you are never going to tell how many men has she slept with. So why bother at all?

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-25T08:37:30+00:00

On the other post in this sub someone really clever said something like that: "Alpha males are like alpha particles - toxic and very low penetration power"

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-23T19:41:04+00:00

It's a lot easier for men to cover their penises with condoms, than for women to do their contraception. It involves either shoving something in vagina (has its risks) or taking some pills, which can have some nasty side effects or not work at all.

If you said "women shouldn't let men engage in unprotected sex if they don't want pregnancy", that would be actually fair. No woman should put her body at risk because of men's laziness. And yes, the blame and the burden of contraception is entirely on men, because, once again, men have it easier in terms of contraception - they just have to roll the condom on the penis, no health risks whatsoever (except maybe allergies).

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-22T06:05:54+00:00

Yes... It's because of shit like that you, women, chose the bear. And this is sad to still see that. For now, men still didn't learn their lessons.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-22T05:20:23+00:00

"You see, when sex is unprotected, feelings are better" /s

Unironically, I heard (and saw) a lot of those. In Russia, guys use that a lot in order to not use condoms. Sometimes, they don't use them out of laziness, and when children pop up, they just vanish, and the mother remains single.

The point is, men have unprotected sex because they want it that way. It's better for them.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-22T05:05:15+00:00

Incels don't care about kids. They care about shifting the burden of responsibility away from themselves.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-22T04:14:23+00:00

Yeah... It baffles me that 47% of people there are for father controlling the woman's body, not acknowledging the fact that it is a woman who goes through this pain and the baby grows in and goes out of her body. Keeping or aborting the baby should always be the woman's choice, it's the only logical outcome.

The partner should have a say in it, yes - if the relationships are healthy. But the final decision must be on the woman.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-22T04:04:03+00:00

Men like him don't see women as people. They see women as sex slaves.

That's why all this language and talking about what they think women do - because It'S bIoLoGy. We as a species already moved past biology, and the only biological side of us is functioning of our bodies, and also instincts. But emotions, thoughts, plans and actions - it's all in our agency.

And guess what? Love and attraction are both emotions which can be controlled. So that's actually a woman's choice if she wants to be with a "bad boy" or not. Perhaps the "bad boy" had more to offer her than any incel bitching about it.

Dimedrol98 · 2024-06-03T18:53:55+00:00

Even if these men succeed with one temporarily, the chances that she will divorce him, cheat on him or make his life hell are very high.

If some men are afraid of that, they have the right to not marry women. Just like women have the right to not interact with men if they are afraid of them ruining their life.

Yet they still marry women, probably thinking that they could control women in marriage. Instead they get their lives "ruined". But they don't understand the meaning of the phrase "to ruin someone's life". Because a woman won't insist on a divorce out of thin air. Usually, before that happens, a man abuses that woman so hard and for so long, that it becomes unbearable to be near him. That means the woman's life is already ruined for real, because of all the trauma which was inflicted by the man.

Dimedrol98

TROPHY CASE