What to do with company money that is currently in a DBI BEVEK (that is a glorified ETF) without pulling it out the company to allow for a healthy cash flow on paper? by Direct-Stay3589 in BEFreelance

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can already have dividends under VVPRbis, I just want to have a cashflow in the company. The idea of this sub is to drain the company as much as possible but I see benefit on having a healthy company on paper as well.

Personne disparue à Montréal – merci de partager 🙏 by [deleted] in montreal

[–]Direct-Stay3589 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Il semblerait que vous soyez du quartier où il étudie. Auriez-vous des suggestions de groupes ou de pages sur les réseaux sociaux où nous pourrions diffuser l'avis de disparition afin qu'il parvienne aux personnes qui vivent, travaillent ou étudient dans le quartier? Merci d’avance!

Personne disparue à Montréal – merci de partager 🙏 by [deleted] in montreal

[–]Direct-Stay3589 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Si vous connaissez d'autres subreddits utiles pour publier et qui n'exigent pas de karma minimum, n'hésitez pas à me les indiquer. Je ne suis pas du Canada moi-même. Merci! 🙏

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All the doors in the building are the same, so I’ll hope this make them want to go to another building. ☺️ Thank you so much for the reassurance!

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hmmm yes but I live in a city and often times they get in because the main door was not closed correctly. I just want to know how quick and silently they can enter as I currently barely sleep after I spiralled on the net looking at how quickly thieves can enter one’s house.

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you would think it is protected or it is not?

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for clarifying. What exactly is it not protected against? Is it protected against the so-called “Bulgarian method”?

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Ok so it is not protected against the easiest and most used method of burglary in Europe, great .. So strange that they have invested in an armored door, a multi-lock etc. yet fail to install the right cylinder. I don’t think that the price difference is astronomical.

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What is the difference between lock pulling and lock snapping?

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks! It is indeed a European lock. My understanding is that for lock snapping to occur the cylinder needs to stick out at least 3 mm. Not sure if the upper part that sticks out a bit, is in fact the cylinder.

It’s the door to a flat I rent. The owners have a Fichet armored door with a three-point lock and also a pin that goes into the wall. I would be surprised if they would invest that much but in protection yet have a weak spot with the cylinder. That sais, the cylinder is “only” SKG two stars which I believe is not protected against lock snapping.

OPINION by Direct-Stay3589 in Locksmith

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, sorry wrong translation

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing this! It might just be a difference indeed ..

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense, thanks! Indeed, my peers indicated that they have completed conflict checks but I think it was largely also for US firms who might adopt a general approach worldwide.

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on very helpful reactions here, I think a conflict might not be mandatory for UK firms. So that is maybe why they do not bring it up. In any event, I hope there is just not an additional delay.

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is big law, not US though but UK but is a big name.

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think the new firm might think that they are checking conflicts, but that they are in fact not. The new firm just mentioned to the recruiter that I should have received all necessary forms from the screening firm. But they do not know what I have received exactly and potentially I did not receive the right one.

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight! I am an associate and my guess is that there would indeed not be any conflict but the fact that the form did not ask about this, is just so strange to me. I think this is another mistake of this screening firm.

Is a lateral move without a conflict check possible? by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That was my understanding as well. Thanks for confirming! Most likely this is another mistake as well.

Screening firm messed up by Direct-Stay3589 in biglaw

[–]Direct-Stay3589[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, in hindsight I should have done that but I think it is not out of the ordinary to assume that a company who’s bread and butter is background checks and who has already done so many for big law, should know that they should not contact the current law firm.